Author Topic: A question for Jackie:  (Read 29073 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
A question for Jackie:
« on: May 13, 2017, 11:11:AM »
Why did Julie turn down June's offer of a flat in London, if she was just with Bamber for his future inheritance ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2017, 11:41:AM »
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.itv.com/news/london/2014-07-15/the-rise-and-rise-of-london-house-prices-1986-to-2014/&ved=0ahUKEwiHwKDf1ezTAhXKDcAKHcNhAlsQFggnMAA&usg=AFQjCNGH3-V_t39YoG8oedy3hptcWGmy7g

Average flat prices in London in the mid 80's were £55,000p. Which is £116,000 today.

Which would have been good work for a teenage student. She could leave Bamber after getting the flat. Or stay with him & wait for the next 20 years hoping to be a part of a future inheritance.

She did neither.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2017, 11:46:AM »
Why did Julie turn down June's offer of a flat in London, if she was just with Bamber for his future inheritance ?

Obviously June hated her
Simple

Why do you think Julie carried out the cheque frauds?
I believe she probably put the idea into Jeremy's head how easy it would be to rob the caravan park

Maybe you could remind me of the dates of the cheque fraud and the caravan robbery
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2017, 11:47:AM »
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.itv.com/news/london/2014-07-15/the-rise-and-rise-of-london-house-prices-1986-to-2014/&ved=0ahUKEwiHwKDf1ezTAhXKDcAKHcNhAlsQFggnMAA&usg=AFQjCNGH3-V_t39YoG8oedy3hptcWGmy7g

Average flat prices in London in the mid 80's were £55,000p. Which is £116,000 today.

Which would have been good work for a teenage student. She could leave Bamber after getting the flat. Or stay with him & wait for the next 20 years hoping to be a part of a future inheritance.

She did neither.

Julie was greedy
Fact
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2017, 11:50:AM »
Obviously June hated her
Simple

Why do you think Julie carried out the cheque frauds?
I believe she probably put the idea into Jeremy's head how easy it would be to rob the caravan park

Maybe you could remind me of the dates of the cheque fraud and the caravan robbery

You didn't answer the question -

Why did Julie turn down £55,000/£116,000 from June, if she was just with Bamber to be part of a possible future inheritance ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2017, 12:24:PM »
Because June was trying to separate JB from her,JM, as she hadn't liked her,so " buying her off " was favourite rather than losing her son to her. The offer wasn't exactly walking distance away,was it ?
June had been against co-habiting and all that it stood for,which is why both Sheila and Colin agreed that June was a " religious monster ",their words,not mine. His words had upset AE !!

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2017, 01:02:PM »
Why did Julie turn down June's offer of a flat in London, if she was just with Bamber for his future inheritance ?

Hi Adam can I have a source for this please.  If June offered to buy in flat in London she probably would have kept it in her own name not Julie's and if this is true she wanted Julie away from her area as it would be such an embarrassment to her Julie staying in the cottage with  Jeremy she would not approve of this at all.  IMO she would not have paid out such a large sum of money and not kept control of the property.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2017, 01:05:PM »
You didn't answer the question -

Why did Julie turn down £55,000/£116,000 from June, if she was just with Bamber to be part of a possible future inheritance ?

I did read my post

Mugford knew June hated her
Simple
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2017, 01:07:PM »
Hi Adam can I have a source for this please.  If June offered to buy in flat in London she probably would have kept it in her own name not Julie's and if this is true she wanted Julie away from her area as it would be such an embarrassment to her Julie staying in the cottage with  Jeremy she would not approve of this at all.  IMO she would not have paid out such a large sum of money and not kept control of the property.

Of course Susan, I would like to see the source too

Could you post that up in your next reply
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2017, 01:09:PM »
I did read my post

Mugford knew June hated her
Simple

You said June hated Julie.

That does not explain why Julie turned down June's huge financial offer.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2017, 01:11:PM »
Of course Susan, I would like to see the source too

Could you post that up in your next reply

I've already supplied two sources this week.

Julie's WS & Bamber's police interviews.

Please keep up.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
« Last Edit: May 13, 2017, 01:14:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2017, 01:16:PM »
You said June hated Julie.

That does not explain why Julie turned down June's huge financial offer.

Whomsoever allegedly said it, I think "hate" is FAR to strong a word to be applied to a devoutly Christian woman. Is there not something in the Bible about hating the wrong, NOT the wrongdoer. If we're discussing premarital sex, Jeremy was a more than willing participant. IF "hate" is applied to Julie, ergo, for the same reason, it must be applied to Jeremy.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2017, 01:33:PM »
Has Bamber ever said June hated Julie ? The first I've heard of this is today.

Jackie answering my question on why an apparent greedy Julie turned down £116,000 of today's money because.....June hated Julie ? !
« Last Edit: May 13, 2017, 01:37:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A question for Jackie:
« Reply #14 on: May 13, 2017, 01:43:PM »
Has Bamber ever said June hated Julie ? The first I've heard of this is today.

Jackie answering my question on why an apparent greedy Julie turned down £116,000 of today's money because.....June hated Julie ?

I don't think Julie would have felt one thing in particular when June made the offer. If she was the gold digger she's being painted as being, surely her first reaction would surely have been along the lines of "Goody, goody, I'm rich. I can live in it, sell it, or let it. I wonder which will give me the best return"!!!!! She was a 20 year old student, NOT a seasoned business woman. Of course, she may have felt insulted by the offer. Humiliated, even. MAYBE she'd been bought up never to accept gifts from strangers? Whatever, I think it has to be accepted that it was never likely that she'd get her hands on it. June could have put it in trust for the twins. I very much doubt she'd have countenanced Julie walking away with the money for it.