How many minutes before the police would have rumbled Julie ?

[sherlock]

Follow David's post,Adam.I dare you !

Adam is completely incapable of answering David's detailed points on this one ...

Not only is Adam's case dismissed but it doesn't look like he will get an appeal either ...

If Adam has good answers to David's points then i cant wait to hear them ...

[sherlock]

I bet Bamber got a shock when he returned from sipping champagne in St Tropez.

After my mothers funeral my very strong desire was to go and sit on a mediterranean beach for a while as a way of dealing with it - what's unusual about that Adam ?

I also love champagne - what's unusual about that Adam ?

Why does your profile end with the words "'Only I know what really happened that night" ?  - now that is something that appears unusual to me ...

[Steve_uk]

After my mothers funeral my very strong desire was to go and sit on a mediterranean beach for a while as a way of dealing with it - what's unusual about that Adam ?

I also love champagne - what's unusual about that Adam ?

Why does your profile end with the words "'Only I know what really happened that night" ?  - now that is something that appears unusual to me ...

It's what Bamber himself told Liz Rimington shortly after the murders.

[sherlock]

It's what Bamber himself told Liz Rimington shortly after the murders.

have you got a source for that please ?

[guest2181]

have you got a source for that please ?

Wilkes book  page 89.

[David1819]

have you got a source for that please ?

In the early to mid 1990s Liz said that Jeremy said. 'Only I know what really happened that night'

Why it took Liz Rimington almost 10 years to reveal this to an author and not the authorities nor at trial back in 1986, is in my opinion, because such a conversation never happened.

[guest2181]

In the early to mid 1990s Liz said that Jeremy said. 'Only I know what really happened that night'

Why it took Liz Rimington almost 10 years to reveal this to an author and not the authorities nor at trial back in 1986, is in my opinion, because such a conversation never happened.

Wow, really? That's a shocker. 

In my opinion, I don't believe there is sufficient information to conclude whether such a conversation occurred or not, nor indeed to know the context of such a conversation, if it actually did occur.

[JackieD]

It's what Bamber himself told Liz Rimington shortly after the murders.

supposition meaning, definition, what is supposition: the fact of believing something is true without any proof or something that you believe

[JackieD]

Wow, really? That's a shocker. 

In my opinion, I don't believe there is sufficient information to conclude whether such a conversation occurred or not, nor indeed to know the context of such a conversation, if it actually did occur.

What a surprise! This is what this case is like with Ann Eaton and Robert Boutflour being the worst culprits

[guest2181]

What a surprise! This is what this case is like with Ann Eaton and Robert Boutflour being the worst culprits

Eh? 

In your eagerness to respond, it appears that you forgot to actually read what I posted. 

[Adam]

In the early to mid 1990s Liz said that Jeremy said. 'Only I know what really happened that night'

Why it took Liz Rimington almost 10 years to reveal this to an author and not the authorities nor at trial back in 1986, is in my opinion, because such a conversation never happened.

Wilkes interviewed her 10 years later. And she told him. That's why.

Wilkes also interviewed Bamber, who obviously didn't deny saying it.

[JackieD]

Eh? 

In your eagerness to respond, it appears that you forgot to actually read what I posted. 

Not at all.  I am talking about the case as a whole. Jeremy Bamber was convicted on circumstantial evidence.

You are agreeing to one small sentence from a book

There are many books written on this case full of supposition and Steve in particular constantly quotes from books with no evidence to back up what the author has written

What is the point?

[guest2181]

Not at all.  I am talking about the case as a whole. Jeremy Bamber was convicted on circumstantial evidence.

You are agreeing to one small sentence from a book

There are many books written on this case full of supposition and Steve in particular constantly quotes from books with no evidence to back up what the author has written

What is the point?

I have no idea what your point is. 

[guest2181]

As I say, I don't think you actually read what I posted. I haven't agreed with one small sentence from a book at all.

You just went straight in to attack mode thinking that I'd posted something else. 

[Steve_uk]

Not at all.  I am talking about the case as a whole. Jeremy Bamber was convicted on circumstantial evidence.

You are agreeing to one small sentence from a book

There are many books written on this case full of supposition and Steve in particular constantly quotes from books with no evidence to back up what the author has written

What is the point?

This is a fair point, but one is entitled to look for patterns of behaviour which I'm afraid do form a damning picture.