Have the relatives petitioned to have everything released under pii

[chelmsey]

I didn't say they hadn't either, but if you're going to call me out on something, particularly without provocation, then it would seem only fair that you are accurate with your facts.

Without provocation? I suggest you go back and read those posts.I wasnt arguing with Jackie on anything.I was being sympathetic regarding JBs relatives if they genuinely believe him guilty.I had said that the Eatons believed JB was where he rightfully should be and innocently thought that you could back me on that,seeings as you havent minded posting regarding the Eatons feelings previously.Big mistake on my part obviously.I should have remebered that it is okay for you to post about them,but not for anyone else on the forum.

No, you specifically referred to me making statements on numerous occasions in one of your posts. It was not a reply to me, I see that as unprovaked. I responded and you've got the arse ache about it, yes I know I shouldn't have sworn and I apologise for that, but my responses stand.

and so do mine. making an innocent mistake with wording is much more acceptable than playing around with wording......in my opinion.

[Hartley]

and so do mine. making an innocent mistake with wording is much more acceptable than playing around with wording......in my opinion.

I'm not playing around with anything, if you want to accuse me of something or suggest I said or did something then I will reply as I see fit.

Whilst this is all completely irrelevant and meaningless, it's these exact same type of mistakes regarding various bits of evidence to do with JB's case which get misquoted and misquoted until they bear no relation to the original.

Anyway, if you'll agree to disagree and we'll leave this here and move on?