Effects of Haloperidol

[Caroline]

How do you expect anyone to ever trust what you say Jane ? Apart from the fact that you now BELIEVE Jeremy to be guilty,what was your REAL reason for changing sides ?
Is it to wind people up ? So when this case comes to its conclusion you can use that as your excuse to cover your abysmal knowledge .

The only one here with abysmal knowledge is you Lookout. You don't care if it's true or not, you post it anyway, as long as it points to an innocent Jeremy. Your posts on Sheila being a party animal are both offensive as untrue. Don't let that stop you though.

[lookout]

The only one here with abysmal knowledge is you Lookout. You don't care if it's true or not, you post it anyway, as long as it points to an innocent Jeremy. Your posts on Sheila being a party animal are both offensive as untrue. Don't let that stop you though.

I DIDN'T say that Sheila was a " party animal ",though even if I HAD said it WHY would it be offensive ??
Sheila liked the bright lights of London and what it had to offer.Are you now disagreeing with this,or was it the more sedate setting of WHF and its surrounds ?

[Jane]

I DIDN'T say that Sheila was a " party animal ",though even if I HAD said it WHY would it be offensive ??
Sheila liked the bright lights of London and what it had to offer.Are you now disagreeing with this,or was it the more sedate setting of WHF and its surrounds ?

Because the way you put it -have ALWAYS put it- put s Sheila across as being a promiscuous drug addict when it was as much about being away from her parents as living in London.

[lookout]

Because the way you put it -have ALWAYS put it- put s Sheila across as being a promiscuous drug addict when it was as much about being away from her parents as living in London.

" Promiscuous drug-addict " now. I'm so glad I didn't say that !!

[Jane]

" Promiscuous drug-addict " now. I'm so glad I didn't say that !!

But EXACTLY that, is what you imply. I seem to recall that a one time member here accused you of referring to Sheila as being promiscuous. I'd remind you that there's no evidence of it, but when did that bother you when it comes to defending Jeremy at whatever the cost to others' characters?

[lookout]

But EXACTLY that, is what you imply. I seem to recall that a one time member here accused you of referring to Sheila as being promiscuous. I'd remind you that there's no evidence of it, but when did that bother you when it comes to defending Jeremy at whatever the cost to others' characters?

I defend myself on here--------then I defend Jeremy. You put David on ignore for digging up old posts,now I'll do the same to you. It works both ways !!

[Jane]

I defend myself on here--------then I defend Jeremy. You put David on ignore for digging up old posts,now I'll do the same to you. It works both ways !!

You may not say the words, but your actions show EXACTLY how what you are differs from how you see yourself. You've gone to a hell of a lot of trouble to avoid apologizing, AGAIN!!  Acting with sheer COWARDICE!!! Do me a favour, PLEASE. Put me on ignore.

[Caroline]

I DIDN'T say that Sheila was a " party animal ",though even if I HAD said it WHY would it be offensive ??
Sheila liked the bright lights of London and what it had to offer.Are you now disagreeing with this,or was it the more sedate setting of WHF and its surrounds ?

No, as usual, you didn't use those exact words but you more than implied it. People don't just live in London for 'bright lights'. She lived there with Colin, she was used to it - that doesn't mean she was out every night which of course - she wasn't.

[lookout]

No, as usual, you didn't use those exact words but you more than implied it. People don't just live in London for 'bright lights'. She lived there with Colin, she was used to it - that doesn't mean she was out every night which of course - she wasn't.

Sheila divorced 3 years after marriage,so had the choice whether to stay in London or go and live near her parents-------------she preferred London,even on her own !

[Jane]

Sheila divorced 3 years after marriage,so had the choice whether to stay in London or go and live near her parents-------------she preferred London,even on her own !

 Hmm? Freedom or imprisonment? What would any of us choose?

[Caroline]

Sheila divorced 3 years after marriage,so had the choice whether to stay in London or go and live near her parents-------------she preferred London,even on her own !

BY then it was her home and the twins were settled there,

[Steve_uk]

She was on her own in all but name, but dependent on June for food and money. In those last few weeks sensing her daughter's desperation she had made arrangements for Sheila to be granted an annual allowance of £3000 to be paid in quarterly instalments in an attempt to alleviate her desolation at losing the children during the week and the fading hopes of reconciliation with Colin.

[lookout]

Sheila couldn't cope on her own,let alone look after twins. Her neighbours were her only salvation when Sheila had screaming fits through the night. What sort of a life was that for her with no-one to turn to?

[Steve_uk]

Sheila couldn't cope on her own,let alone look after twins. Her neighbours were her only salvation when Sheila had screaming fits through the night. What sort of a life was that for her with no-one to turn to?

I think that's why June was trying to arrange for Sheila to get a job at Osea Road for £40 per week. I do get the impression that the Boutflours were fiercely protective of the caravan park and maybe June didn't have the courage to ask her sister to get her niece a job there.

[lookout]

I think that's why June was trying to arrange for Sheila to get a job at Osea Road for £40 per week. I do get the impression that the Boutflours were fiercely protective of the caravan park and maybe June didn't have the courage to ask her sister to get her niece a job there.

Yet it was June who founded the caravan park in her early years,but that went unrecognised. It proves how the Bambers were shunned so it's no wonder there was no love lost between families.