Author Topic: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?  (Read 12372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #45 on: March 23, 2017, 09:38:AM »
Yes, it can be proved!

I have spoken personally with hundreds of convicted people during my incarceration, many of whom admitted their guilt (to me) and were sentenced accordingly! Others, like Bamber have denied responsibility for crimes they were convicted of!!!

Let's just deal with the cases where prisoners have always denied culpability of the crimes they were convicted of!

80% of these cases, I discovered that evidence used to prosecute these people, had been fabricated!!!


OK. Prove it. Jeremy saying he didn't do it, DOESN'T.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #46 on: March 23, 2017, 09:41:AM »
Let's deal with this 80% of cases where the vast majority involved prisoners who to some extent or another admitted involvement (to me) in the crimes they were ultimately convicted of...

I found examples of police corruption in many of these cases!!

I have years, and years, of personal experience, in dealing with the aftermath of such cases!

'Cons', or inmates, or prisoners, confiding in me, how although they were guilty (as charged and convicted/sentenced) the so called honest Criminal justice system had stitched them up!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #47 on: March 23, 2017, 09:48:AM »
I have years, and years, of personal experience, in dealing with the aftermath of such cases!

'Cons', or inmates, or prisoners, confiding in me, how although they were guilty (as charged and convicted/sentenced) the so called honest Criminal justice system had stitched them up!!


None of which goes any way to prove that Jeremy didn't use something to further subdue her/render her compliant. Actually, I have no problem with the guilty being stitched up. I call it poetic justice. The police may have picked up on the adage "set a thief to catch a thief".

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #48 on: March 23, 2017, 09:53:AM »
Or-------" no honesty among thieves " if blaming Jeremy and the relatives as far as motives are concerned ?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #49 on: March 23, 2017, 10:12:AM »

OK. Prove it. Jeremy saying he didn't do it, DOESN'T.

He passed a lie detector test!

I remember the build up to this being arranged!

I have sent Jeremy the photograph of Sheila on the bed! It caused all sorts of problems for him, and myself in my affairs with Jeremy! Just take it as being true that Sheila was on the bed, before cops moved her body to the floor, and whilst ever she was upon the bed (gospel) she only had one bullet wound to her throat!

The Home Office currently rely upon polygraph test results to monitor sex offenders released on Parole license - so please don't even try to fob me off by declaring that such tests are unreliable!

Before Jeremy took the polygraph test - let me tell you about things that were spelled out to him by GDS, and myself!

We told him, in no uncertain terms that if he failed the polygraph test, it would be the 'end of the Road', as far as any appeal was concerned!!!

Now, Jeremy, to his credit kept saying that he did not have any involvement in the deaths of his family!

I personally believed him, and I still do believe he wasn't inside the farmhouse when anyone got shot! I once got a glimmer of hope in my mindset, when I once suggested that he might have been Sheila's accomplice! He had responded to this suggestion of mine, by declaring, 'You Clever Bastard' !!

If Bamber had failed the polygraph test he knew that the likes of GDS and myself could not support him any further!!!

He passed the polygraph test, you should remind yourself of the questions which were put to him during that test, and the answers he gave sharply! He had no deal what the questions were going to be! He answered all questions sharply!

The expert who conducted the polygraph test believes that Jeremy told the truth and that he was not present at the farmhouse when anybody was shot and killed, and that Jeremy had received a call from Neville Bamber! I did not need a polygraph test to convince myself that what Jeremy had told me, was the truth! He is not clever enough to be able to manipulate the truth! He thinks he's clever, but the truth is none of us are that clever that we can manipulate the gods honest truth! You see when somebody tells a lie, somewhere along the line, things start to stack up against it being the truth! I am 61 years old, and I have a life time of experience which I would like to think entitles me to be in a good position to determine when somebody is telling lies, or not!

In all the years I have had dealings with Jeremy Bamber, there has only been one occasion when I sensed something was wrong with what he had been telling me, and that was when I once suggested to him, that 'he' might have been an accomplice of Sheila's!

'You Clever Bastard' he responded! You read into this, what you may! I have my own views on the matter! I never pursued the matter any further, my question and his answer told me everything I needed to know...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #50 on: March 23, 2017, 10:14:AM »

None of which goes any way to prove that Jeremy didn't use something to further subdue her/render her compliant. Actually, I have no problem with the guilty being stitched up. I call it poetic justice. The police may have picked up on the adage "set a thief to catch a thief".

You should hold your head in shame - there is no room in the Criminal Justice System for Corruption and dishonesty!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #51 on: March 23, 2017, 10:16:AM »
Or-------" no honesty among thieves " if blaming Jeremy and the relatives as far as motives are concerned ?

See, I rather see the relatives as fighting to retain something they'd ALL worked their guts out for to prevent it all falling into the hands of a usurper whose only interest in it was what he could make on it.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #52 on: March 23, 2017, 10:17:AM »
You should hold your head in shame - there is no room in the Criminal Justice System for Corruption and dishonesty!

So you'd sooner see the guilty walk free?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #53 on: March 23, 2017, 10:18:AM »
So, it is clearly spelled out, from one of the guilty camp, that they agree with a bit of corruption here, and a bit of dishonesty there!

How can people who hold such views and beliefs, expect to discover the truth in any matter, and case, any event?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #54 on: March 23, 2017, 10:20:AM »
So you'd sooner see the guilty walk free?

Your approach is a dishonest one!

I thought you were posting here to get to the truth!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #55 on: March 23, 2017, 10:24:AM »
There's an old saying, which I took a shine to - ' there are three versions of the truth, your version, my version, and somewhere in between what you, and I believe to be the truth!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #56 on: March 23, 2017, 10:26:AM »
There's an old saying, which I took a shine to - ' there are three versions of the truth, your version, my version, and somewhere in between what you, and I believe to be the truth!!

The actual truth is somewhere between what you and I might be saying!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #57 on: March 23, 2017, 10:29:AM »
It has always fascinated me, the methods adopted by police officers, in the way they set out to deliberately falsify evidence to support the prosecution of a person!

Why go to such lengths, when a person is admitting the offence anyway?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #58 on: March 23, 2017, 10:32:AM »
Your approach is a dishonest one!

I thought you were posting here to get to the truth!!


SOMETIMES crime has to be fought with crime. You may think my APPROACH dishonest, but I haven't made a career out of being dishonest or trying to defraud. For those who have, I'm prepared for the police to use whatever means they have at their disposal to stop this happening, because it's MY hard earned money some of these criminals are stealing. OH, and I've heard you getting pretty irate about it, too.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why didn't Nevill leave WHF's front door ajar for Bamber & co ?
« Reply #59 on: March 23, 2017, 10:32:AM »
It has always fascinated me, the methods adopted by police officers, in the way they set out to deliberately falsify evidence to support the prosecution of a person!

Why go to such lengths, when a person is admitting the offence anyway?
it has now become clear that those amongst the Bamber is guilty camp, advocate corruption and dishonesty! It is a sad, sad day for our forum!

How can anybody advocate dishonesty?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...