Letter Trail - Wallet

[lookout]

It's not forensic evidence.

However Bamber looking for Nevill's wallet just after the massacre is a surprise for a grieving and in shock son/brother/uncle.

The wallet was well gone as soon as the rellies had the keys. Jeremy never had a chance to find out the content.
How much was in the wallet ? How long is a piece of string ? 

[Adam]

The wallet was well gone as soon as the rellies had the keys. Jeremy never had a chance to find out the content.
How much was in the wallet ? How long is a piece of string ? 

The relatives handed the wallet into the police. They would know what was in it which is why what was in it is in AE's WS.

[Caroline]

It's not forensic evidence.

However Bamber looking for Nevill's wallet just after the massacre is a surprise for a grieving and in shock son/brother/uncle.

It's the fact that he avoided answering the question about it that's the issue. If there was nothing to it, why ignore that one question and then claim you couldn't remember what the question was but you knew the answer. He knew, but for some reason, he didn't want to answer.

[Adam]

It's the fact that he avoided answering the question about it that's the issue. If there was nothing to it, why ignore that one question and then claim you couldn't remember what the question was but you knew the answer. He knew, but for some reason, he didn't want to answer.

Think you're being a bit hard on him. It looks like he sent you long hand written letters. In response to you're letters. Which he would be doing for lots of other people as well. So may miss something.

All he had to say was I didn't know what in the wallet. Then say  AE's WS just says what was in it as she handed it in, rather than it saying I gave her an itemised list.

[Caroline]

Think you're being a bit hard on him. It looks like he sent you long hand written letters. In response to you're letters. Which he would be doing for lots of other people as well. So may miss something.

All he had to say was I didn't know what in the wallet & AE's WS just says what was in it as she handed it in, rather than it saying I gave her an itemised list.

Yes Adam 

[lookout]

He could have said sod off you won't believe what I say so why should I waste my time.

What I see is honesty and determination. Well done to him for staying focussed.

[Caroline]

He could have said sod off you won't believe what I say so why should I waste my time.

What I see is honesty and determination. Well done to him for staying focussed.

Of course you do Lookout, I have no doubt that Jeremy is every bit as honest as you!

[JackiePreece]

Certainly you do or you wouldn't have commented.

'She' could have posted this information at anytime but 'she' knows it has NO importance

As for the lie detector test anyone can get this information

Because I have always had a genuine interest in this case I have spoken in person and at depth with the person who carried out the tests
He is in no doubt that the tests show Jeremy was not responsible for the murders
He continues to keep in touch with Jeremy

Once again allegations are being made which are pure speculation

How very interesting 'she' decided to post this information at this time

[JackiePreece]

First gormless reply of the night but up to your usual standard. I was asked to post the letter Jackie so take your bullshit out to the stables and give your login details to the banned member so she can post an intelligent response!

I find it so easy to answer every one of your posts because you only post pure speculation . In all the time you have been on this forum you have failed to make a single post that proves Jeremy is guilty

It's hilarious really

[Jane]

'She' could have posted this information at anytime but 'she' knows it has NO importance

As for the lie detector test anyone can get this information

Because I have always had a genuine interest in this case I have spoken in person and at depth with the person who carried out the tests
He is in no doubt that the tests show Jeremy was not responsible for the murders
He continues to keep in touch with Jeremy

Once again allegations are being made which are pure speculation

How very interesting 'she' decided to post this information at this time

COURSE you have Jackie. Just like you've made friends with writer/authors/television/film crews/psychiatrists/doctors psychologists who all come running as soon as you click your fingers, OH yes and Paul Harrison.

[Jane]

I find it so easy to answer every one of your posts because you only post pure speculation . In all the time you have been on this forum you have failed to make a single post that proves Jeremy is guilty

It's hilarious really

And none of your speculative drivel proves him innocent.

[lookout]

Of course you do Lookout, I have no doubt that Jeremy is every bit as honest as you!

Of course he is and he won't go far wrong being so either.

[Caroline]

Of course he is and he won't go far wrong being so either.

He certainly won't! 

[JackiePreece]

And none of your speculative drivel proves him innocent.

Fact Jane J you have not come up with a single piece of evidence that Jeremy is guilty

[Jane]

Fact Jane J you have not come up with a single piece of evidence that Jeremy is guilty

Have you missed something? I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING. The court has already done it.