Author Topic: In Conversation .......  (Read 10456 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #60 on: March 09, 2017, 04:39:PM »
This post is known as a bum steer - and it's about your limit!




Myall in his trial evidence referred to WHF as " the house ".( He and JB were a distance from the " house )"

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #61 on: March 09, 2017, 07:20:PM »



Myall in his trial evidence referred to WHF as " the house ".( He and JB were a distance from the " house )"

Did he? So he didn't refer it it as the FARM then?  ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #62 on: March 09, 2017, 07:30:PM »
Did he? So he didn't refer it it as the FARM then?  ;D ;D ;D



A frayed knot. ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #63 on: March 09, 2017, 07:34:PM »


A frayed knot. ;D

Good, then you will see there is a distinction between 'farm' and 'house'  ;)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #64 on: March 09, 2017, 07:41:PM »
Good, then you will see there is a distinction between 'farm' and 'house'  ;)




A house attached to a farm is a farmhouse. Which most would have referred to. It was no ordinary house.
You don't call it "a house attached to a farm" do you ? When writing notes.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #65 on: March 09, 2017, 08:04:PM »



A house attached to a farm is a farmhouse. Which most would have referred to. It was no ordinary house.
You don't call it "a house attached to a farm" do you ? When writing notes.

Lookout, this just won't wash - Bonnett (like it or not) made a distinction between 'Farm' and 'House'. He wasn' talking about the same thing or person when he made that distinction.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #66 on: March 09, 2017, 08:11:PM »
Lookout, this just won't wash - Bonnett (like it or not) made a distinction between 'Farm' and 'House'. He wasn' talking about the same thing or person when he made that distinction.




I just don't understand your logic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #67 on: March 09, 2017, 08:12:PM »



I just don't understand your logic.

Well it isn't difficult Lookout. Perhaps that's because you aren't logical?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #68 on: March 09, 2017, 08:36:PM »
Well it isn't difficult Lookout. Perhaps that's because you aren't logical?





I don't understand what you're getting at regarding the thread. It's not making any sense to me at all.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #69 on: March 09, 2017, 09:37:PM »




I don't understand what you're getting at regarding the thread. It's not making any sense to me at all.

OK let me spell it out for you.

Jeremy and the CT claim that Sheila was alive inside the farmhouse and the proof of that is written on Bonnett's log "Firearms team in conversation with person from inside the FARM Which goes on to say "Challenge to persons inside the HOUSE met with no response'.

So the conversation (as per Collin's statement) was with JEREMY just prior to him making the challenge through the loud hailer and NOT with anyone inside the house so it is NOT proof that anyone was alive inside the farmhouse. Capiche?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #70 on: March 09, 2017, 10:29:PM »
OK let me spell it out for you.

Jeremy and the CT claim that Sheila was alive inside the farmhouse and the proof of that is written on Bonnett's log "Firearms team in conversation with person from inside the FARM Which goes on to say "Challenge to persons inside the HOUSE met with no response'.

So the conversation (as per Collin's statement) was with JEREMY just prior to him making the challenge through the loud hailer and NOT with anyone inside the house so it is NOT proof that anyone was alive inside the farmhouse. Capiche?





To me,it spells out poor grammar and should read " from within the farm ". It still means the same that " there was no response from inside the house ". Still speaking about the farmhouse,but not as the whole word.

Where is " inside the farm,anyway ?" Barn,Field,Shed.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #71 on: March 10, 2017, 12:34:AM »




To me,it spells out poor grammar and should read " from within the farm ". It still means the same that " there was no response from inside the house ". Still speaking about the farmhouse,but not as the whole word.

Where is " inside the farm,anyway ?" Barn,Field,Shed.

No it doesn't because he distinguished FARM from HOUSE. There is no getting away from it - he was talking about JEREMY being in conversation with COLLINS!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #72 on: March 10, 2017, 07:47:AM »
Does Sheila still being alive at 7.37am, and perhaps thereafter, for up to an hour and a half later, get reflected by the findings of fact regarding 'death having occurred several hours beforehand' by the pathologist, as distinct from a similar finding of fact relating to the estimated time of death in Neville Bambers case?

I believe it does, because the timing of estimated death provided by the pathologist has to be offset against the time he saw both of the bodies in question!

Sheila's autopsy was performed hours after Neville's had already been concluded!

If Sheila was the person who removed the anshuzt rifle from the first floor box room window after 7.37am, then the pathogists findings of fact that in her case 'death had occurred several hours beforehand' has to take that / this into account!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #73 on: March 10, 2017, 08:45:AM »
No it doesn't because he distinguished FARM from HOUSE. There is no getting away from it - he was talking about JEREMY being in conversation with COLLINS!




In YOUR mind,perhaps.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #74 on: March 10, 2017, 12:07:PM »
05.38------From HQR,believed 3 adults and 3 children in HOUSE. HOUSE contained TFG. Challenged HOUSE on loudspeaker. No response ( PC Adams commander )

Dated---7/8/85.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2017, 12:11:PM by lookout »