Witheld Docs

[Steve_uk]

David, what are you hoping to discover or deduce from your efforts?

[BarefootDanC]

I've gone through at least 10k pages of material.

About 1%.

Did you find anything juicy?

[ILB]

I think the main issue is the sharing of documents with Bamber.

He should have a right to see them. It should be a right afforded to everyone who is a UK citizen.

[Jane]

I think the main issue is the sharing of documents with Bamber.

He should have a right to see them. It should be a right afforded to everyone who is a UK citizen.

I was given to understand he'd never actually been denied access. All he had to do was name those he wanted.

[ILB]

I was given to understand he'd never actually been denied access. All he had to do was name those he wanted.

Doesn't seem feasible that to me. Not saying it's not the case. Just doesn't make sense.

[Adam]

There are no hidden documents.

After 39 years, 3 CCRC applications, 2 COA applications, a trial & Stokechurch.

There are thousands of documents online, some of them Mike posted years ago.

Bamber says he has millions in his cell & has his own campaign team. David claims he has gone through at least 10,000.

The CCRC & COA have the power to get whatever documents they want.

But appreciate 'withheld documents' will always be the mantra from supporters as the released documents have not got him anywhere.

[ILB]

There are no hidden documents.

After 39 years, 3 CCRC applications, 2 COA applications, a trial & Stokechurch.

There are thousands of documents online, some of them Mike posted years ago.

Bamber says he has millions in his cell & has his own campaign team. David claims he has gone through at least 10,000.

The CCRC & COA have the power to get whatever documents they want.

But appreciate 'withheld documents' will always be the mantra from supporters as the released documents have not got him anywhere.

Well it's not mantra from supporters. It's mantra from Jeremy Bamber himself. It's his case and he's the one serving a life sentence for it.

He doesn't have millions of documents in his cell. He will have so many. He then will have to put in a app for the others. Which are stored in the jail.

[Adam]

Well it's not mantra from supporters. It's mantra from Jeremy Bamber himself. It's his case and he's the one serving a life sentence for it.

He doesn't have millions of documents in his cell. He will have so many. He then will have to put in a app for the others. Which are stored in the jail.

https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/public-interest-immunity

The mantra will always be the police are withholding documents.

Not sure why. If there was an industrial frame, any documents showing innocence would have been destroyed.

If there was no industrial frame, then no documents will show innocence.

[ILB]

https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/public-interest-immunity

The mantra will always be the police are withholding documents.

Not sure why. If there was an industrial frame, any documents showing innocence would have been destroyed.

If there was no industrial frame, then no documents will show innocence.

Then the mantra is true as the chef constable of Essex police  confirmed in a letter to Peter Thatchell in 2021https://www.petertatchellfoundation.org/essex-police-admit-suppressing-jeremy-bamber-evidence/

Not saying the documents prove his innocence. It's just he has a right to see them. Which we all should be afforded.

[BarefootDanC]

Then the mantra is true as the chef constable of Essex police  confirmed in a letter to Peter Thatchell in 2021https://www.petertatchellfoundation.org/essex-police-admit-suppressing-jeremy-bamber-evidence/

Not saying the documents prove his innocence. It's just he has a right to see them. Which we all should be afforded.

Essex police made no admission.

[Roch]

Essex police made no admission.

It was in their wording. That is to say, they accidentally implied that there was further evidence to disclose.

[Roch]

There is a very detailed document from 2021, about non-disclosed evidence, stemming from BR's research.  I will post up within next 24 hrs.

[ILB]

Essex police made no admission.

It is from a chief constable.....

" Not willing to disclose it at this time "

It's in black and white

[Rob_]

I was given to understand he'd never actually been denied access. All he had to do was name those he wanted.

How can you name documents that you don't know exist but should have been disclosed?

[Rob_]

https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/public-interest-immunity

The mantra will always be the police are withholding documents.

Not sure why. If there was an industrial frame, any documents showing innocence would have been destroyed.

If there was no industrial frame, then no documents will show innocence.

It has that's why Sheila's dress was destroyed, and a certain dodgy cop took documents home and destroyed them.