0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
can anyone get this.you don't have to be completely convinced of somones innocence to say there conviction is unsafe.
of course its not but as the law says inocent untill proven guity not guilty untill proven inoncent an unsafe conviction still deserves to be treated as a misscaredge of justice.
im not happy with the bary geordge sitaun because the fact the police are now looking at other suspects means the more or less exept he dident do it.
Well I don't know about Jill Dando, but I was pleased he didn't get any compensation because of this other crime: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/barry-george-raped-me-by-my-mums-door-then-said-sorry-6890558.html
I didn't know that about barry george steve, I'm glad too he didn't get any compensation.why David ba in though? I am of the opinion that if the person is clean in all other respects and it is a moj then they do deserve compensation. I simply cannot imagine what it must be like to be locked up for something you haven't done the told sorry, here's 46 quid off you go get on with your life. That must be awful
i think if ethere of you met barry geordge you would have no doubt about his innocence.
What for this?In March 1983 he was jailed for 33 months for attempted rape under another of his aliases – Steve Majors, which he borrowed from TV series The Six Million Dollar Man.It lists previous convictions including indecent assault. In 1981 he received a suspended three-month jail term for the sex attack.He was also fined in 1980 for impersonating an officer.
exactly if he cant even xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx how the hell comit murder.I had a short conversion with him once in which he struggled to string a coherent sentence together.I find it hard to belive hed be up to planning and carry murder