Wordsmiths And How Truth Becomes Hidden Or Manipulated

[buddy]

It was common knowledge that if Bamber got convicted, the other relatives would inherit. Bamber & the legal team would have made sure everyone was aware of that.

It's also common sense that this would happen as it's what happens with wills

The jury didn't believe already rich & law abiding relatives would or could frame another relative of murdering his mother, father, sister & nephews.

How do you know the family was very rich Adam? Also the family didn't think of Jeremy as family.
'cuckoo' remember.

[Adam]

How do you know the family was very rich Adam? Also the family didn't think of Jeremy as family.
'cuckoo' remember.

https://youtu.be/BLedeOGdj2U

[Adam]

My link also confirms for Nugs that the jury were told the relatives would inherit if Bamber was convicted.

So a double Whammy thanks to Bamber's CT.

[guest7363]

My link also confirms for Nugs that the jury were told the relatives would inherit if Bamber was convicted.

So a double Whammy thanks to Bamber's CT.

Well pointed out Adam, the Jury was told and it is covered in earlier post Number 4

[Caroline]

yes you have on servral ocaisions.

most of your posts are personal atacks on people.

then you will be able to point to the post where I attacked you?

[notsure]

Well pointed out Adam, the Jury was told and it is covered in earlier post Number 4

Was that after the jury had asked the question, I don't remember?

Also didn't the judge say something along the lines of jbs evidence not to be relied on.

[buddy]

Well pointed out Adam, the Jury was told and it is covered in earlier post Number 4

With respect that proves absolutely nothing.
The family were beholden to Ralph. He bought the land from the family, because they were skint.

[guest7363]

Was that after the jury had asked the question, I don't remember?

Also didn't the judge say something along the lines of jbs evidence not to be relied on.

Just on my way out Notsure,(football ha ha) will have a look later.

[guest7363]

With respect that proves absolutely nothing.
The family were beholden to Ralph. He bought the land from the family, because they were skint.

Dont forget the wording, Bamber estate and monies, that's what the jury asked, estate I would think meant land?  Yes indirectly RWB would benefit and I would have thought the jury would have seen this if his wife was the main beneficiary?

[buddy]

Dont forget the wording, Bamber estate and monies, that's what the jury asked, estate I would think meant land?  Yes indirectly RWB would benefit and I would have thought the jury would have seen this if his wife was the main beneficiary?

If the jury were told the family were wealthy in their own right it was untrue.
BW wasn't over impressed by the families antics.

[buddy]

Also from the clip that Adam referred to mentioned the silencer/s which he failed to address.

[Adam]

If the jury were told the family were wealthy in their own right it was untrue.
BW wasn't over impressed by the families antics.

Have you got a source that Bamber's CT video is wrong and that the relatives were not rich in their own right ?

They owned property and farm land in the prosperous 1980's.

[Adam]

Also from the clip that Adam referred to mentioned the silencer/s which he failed to address.

I answered you're question which mis quoted me anyway. As I said the relatives were already rich, not 'very' rich.

The silencer has been discussed in other threads. You may have noticed.

[Adam]

Was that after the jury had asked the question, I don't remember?

Also didn't the judge say something along the lines of jbs evidence not to be relied on.

Have you got a source that the judge said this ? I've already posted a summary of the judges summing up which does not include this. 

[buddy]

I answered you're question which mis quoted me anyway. As I said the relatives were already rich, not 'very' rich.

The silencer has been discussed in other threads. You may have noticed.

Adam, on another thread you said the family were very wealthy.