Author Topic: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:  (Read 24701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #210 on: January 10, 2017, 07:08:PM »
I'm not certain how cardiac meds can be equated with mental illness meds. Both require to be correctly balanced though.





Both connected when it comes to medication. There are certain blood pressure tablets which help with anxiety and other problems concerning the brain as well as the heart.
What about vascular dementia ? It's still a mental issue. Alzheimers ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #211 on: January 10, 2017, 07:10:PM »




Both connected when it comes to medication. There are certain blood pressure tablets which help with anxiety and other problems concerning the brain as well as the heart.
What about vascular dementia ? It's still a mental issue. Alzheimers ?

Sheila didn't have vascular dementia, Alzheimers, OR high blood pressure.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #212 on: January 10, 2017, 07:13:PM »
Sheila didn't have vascular dementia, Alzheimers, OR high blood pressure.

That's why I ignored her comment about the heart.
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #213 on: January 10, 2017, 07:13:PM »
Sheila didn't have vascular dementia, Alzheimers, OR high blood pressure.




I know she didn't. I was answering your query about medication for heart and brain combined.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #214 on: January 10, 2017, 07:14:PM »



But I DO know about the symptoms of medications both under-dosing and over-dosing and even the wrong type . It was my job.
I noticed you ignored the one involving the heart !

I've answered. YOU haven't answered Caroline's Maggie's or my explanations of why we changed sides.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #215 on: January 10, 2017, 07:18:PM »



I know she didn't. I was answering your query about medication for heart and brain combined.


I said there was no correlation other than the need for them to be balanced. Sheila's symptoms didn't suggest she required such a combination.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #216 on: January 10, 2017, 07:20:PM »
I've answered. YOU haven't answered Caroline's Maggie's or my explanations of why we changed sides.





 YOU'D enjoy that wouldn't you ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #217 on: January 10, 2017, 07:27:PM »




 YOU'D enjoy that wouldn't you ?

It was your statement/doubts about our integrity that we were responding to.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #218 on: January 10, 2017, 07:35:PM »
It was your statement/doubts about our integrity that we were responding to.





And you answered,so wasn't that enough ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #219 on: January 10, 2017, 07:47:PM »




And you answered,so wasn't that enough ?

But your LACK of response, considering what a big deal you made of it, is very telling. The upfront and honest person you claim to be could have offered an apology for doubting our integrity. I guess as you believe you're always right, you don't do apologies.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #220 on: January 10, 2017, 07:52:PM »
But your LACK of response, considering what a big deal you made of it, is very telling. The upfront and honest person you claim to be could have offered an apology for doubting our integrity. I guess as you believe you're always right, you don't do apologies.




I don't do" telling what to do" either . I remain honest and above all LOYAL too !!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #221 on: January 10, 2017, 07:57:PM »



I don't do" telling what to do" either . I remain honest and above all LOYAL too !!

No one was telling you what to do. Perhaps suggesting that a FREELY given apology would have been nice. Clearly you put loyalty to Jeremy above those who have given you their support. I'm not certain I'd call that honest.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #222 on: January 10, 2017, 08:01:PM »
No one was telling you what to do. Perhaps suggesting that a FREELY given apology would have been nice. Clearly you put loyalty to Jeremy above those who have given you their support. I'm not certain I'd call that honest.





Apology for what exactly ?? Who's given ME their support ? Don't talk wet,nobody's supported me,who,when ?
What am I supposed to have done ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #223 on: January 10, 2017, 08:15:PM »




Apology for what exactly ?? Who's given ME their support ? Don't talk wet,nobody's supported me,who,when ?
What am I supposed to have done ?

You have a very short memory until it comes to the storing of grudges. In the "Who Sowed The Seeds" thread you accused Caroline and me of colluding to withhold the information that we'd changed sides. You then went on to tell us how easy we had it compared to you and how you had to defend yourself against people like us. It was a slur on our integrity. Caroline, Maggie and I, all gave you full, honest and intimate explanations of how we felt. A response to that would have be courteous. It says MUCH about you that you chose to ignore what we said...................as if it had never been said.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Reasons why Bamber's second call to Julie was at 3am:
« Reply #224 on: January 10, 2017, 08:52:PM »
You have a very short memory until it comes to the storing of grudges. In the "Who Sowed The Seeds" thread you accused Caroline and me of colluding to withhold the information that we'd changed sides. You then went on to tell us how easy we had it compared to you and how you had to defend yourself against people like us. It was a slur on our integrity. Caroline, Maggie and I, all gave you full, honest and intimate explanations of how we felt. A response to that would have be courteous. It says MUCH about you that you chose to ignore what we said...................as if it had never been said.





I should have realised that this would be dragged ceaselessly along knowing that I'm already singled out on the forum. Even Adam had a say about my posts,so the best thing all round is for me to leave the forum altogether,like others have done. I don't fit in do I ??
I'll miss it but I don't need cat-fights or the background gossiping that goes on so I'll leave you to it.