Author Topic: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:  (Read 14009 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #195 on: January 07, 2017, 06:38:PM »
Oh dear I think you knew full well I meant the ct website Jane. Are you being fesetious?

To be honest NS, I was going to ask what the ft website was too and no, wasn't being facetious
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #196 on: January 07, 2017, 06:40:PM »
Yes but this one was working on the case ! Not a friend of a friend etc

sounds like idle gossip.
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #197 on: January 07, 2017, 06:43:PM »
I can see where they are appealing for people (police and civilians) to come forward and are suggesting two already have (but anyone could say that). Nothing about a police officer though.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #198 on: January 07, 2017, 07:12:PM »
I had NO idea that you were referring to the CT website because I don't visit it so I can hardly be accused of being facetious.

Fair enough. I'm working from my phone so predicted text keeps getting in the way. My hubby is on the laptop and the tablet is knackered ,

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #199 on: January 07, 2017, 07:31:PM »




No,I didn't give evidence in the ex-boyfriend's trial. All I told him to do was to give himself up.

You said earlier that the law said he wasn't guilty.

I'd studied for my SRN and also RMN in the 60's 70's and 80's,including proof-reading exams in between..

Depressives include those with Bi-Polar,who CAN be violent.
I guess RMN is Registered Mental Nurse, am I right Lookout?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #200 on: January 07, 2017, 08:41:PM »
I guess RMN is Registered Mental Nurse, am I right Lookout?





Yes Maggie. It was then but I don't know whether it's changed name or anything.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #201 on: January 07, 2017, 08:44:PM »




Yes Maggie. It was then but I don't know whether it's changed name or anything.
Think it's changed out of all recognition now Lookout.  No such thing as an SRN either, is there?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #202 on: January 07, 2017, 08:51:PM »
Think it's changed out of all recognition now Lookout.  No such thing as an SRN either, is there?





Gosh,isn't there ? Makes me feel as old as Florence Nightingale,or Methuselah.