Author Topic: The police Message Log Conspiracy - how they framed Jeremy Bamber for murders..  (Read 9259 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
PC Bird got himself into a bit of a pickle whilst testifying regarding photograph No. 23 by wrongly saying that he took photograph No. 23 after he had already photographed the rifle upon Sheila's body (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33), which was not true, and he also stated that photograph 23 had been taken on the 23rd September, 1985 - but, again, this was plainly wrong, and could not possibly have been true because June Bambers hand can been seen in the doorway in photograph 23...

This is what happens when witnesses tell lies. Inconsistencies in testimony stand out. These are not to be confused with something a person might have forgotten. These were damn right lies. They were being told because the cops did not want to have to face the music over shooting dead an unarmed mentally ill female. Nothing could be any clearer, that is what really did happen. Sheila made a show of the rifle at a first floor w window (seen by Jeapes), after which armed cops made their approach to make a forced entry. The way I see it, at 7.15am with the showing of the rifle at a first floor window, Sheila must have been ready to give in. She must have made her way downstairs to the kitchen, probably intending to walk out of the farmhouse unarmed, but was surprised by the farmhouse door being smashed open, and police wielding firearms trying to enter the kitchen...

The show of that rifle at that first floor window was akin to a white flag being waved in the heat of a battle. In a war the waving of such a flag by an enemy or a foe, gained the respect of the victors, or their captures. You wouldn't shoot an unarmed soldier under a recognised truce, would you? Without attracting a charge of war crimes. But, that's what the police might as well be accused of doing, shooting dead an unarmed mentally ill female, dressed only in her light blue nightdress. They killed her, after they spooked her in the kitchen. Having said that, the shot in the kitchen did not kill her outright, cops wrongly believed they had killed her at 7.37am. She lived, she recovered sufficiently enough to get herself up the stairs before collapsing again on her parents bed. It was shortly after this that the police surgeon, pronounced her dead at 8.44am. Her body was 'on the far side of the bed', she only had what appeared to be a single gunshot wound to her throat...

But even then (8.44am) she was not totally dead, unconscious yes, but not quite dead...
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 06:47:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Now that I have time to rest and gather my thoughts regarding this police investigation, it becomes clear to me that the involvement of 'DC Henderson' (SOCO), and 'DC Oakey' (SOCO), in the taking of video at the crime scene, and photographs, all of which still have not yet been fully disclosed, it starts to make sense as to why some key photographs have gone missing. Essex police have not yet even admitted that Henderson and Oakey were present inside the farmhouse on that first morning of the operation, but they both were. PC Bird (SOCO) confirms the presence of Oakey (not to be mistaken for a 'DC Oakley') and the fact that he took photograph 25 which shows the barrel of the rifle resting against the left side of Sheila's neck. The photographs that Bird took of the gun with Sheila Caffells body, showed the barrel in a totally different position on the body, with the muzzle of the guns barrel elevated above the two wounds situated in the throat region beneath...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Now that I have time to rest and gather my thoughts regarding this police investigation, it becomes clear to me that the involvement of 'DC Henderson' (SOCO), and 'DC Oakey' (SOCO), in the taking of video at the crime scene, and photographs, all of which still have not yet been fully disclosed, it starts to make sense as to why some key photographs have gone missing. Essex police have not yet even admitted that Henderson and Oakey were present inside the farmhouse on that first morning of the operation, but they both were. PC Bird (SOCO) confirms the presence of Oakey (not to be mistaken for a 'DC Oakley') and the fact that he took photograph 25 which shows the barrel of the rifle resting against the left side of Sheila's neck. The photographs that Bird took of the gun with Sheila Caffells body, showed the barrel in a totally different position on the body, with the muzzle of the guns barrel elevated above the two wounds situated in the throat region beneath...

The barrel of the rifle elevated above the two wounds in the throat because it was resting against her breasts, whereas, in the photograph (25) taken by 'DC Oakey', it could not have been...
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 08:55:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
For three decades Essex police have allowed Bamber, his legal team, the court which tried the matter, and later at the 2002 appeal, that the only police officer who had taken pictures inside the farmhouse that morning was PC 'David' Bird (SOCO). When all along, PC Bird, DC Henderson, and 'DC 'Oakey, had taken all the photographs, and the crime scene video footage. It now becomes clear to me, why ACC Simpson kept many of the 358 photographs which formed part  of 'The senior Investigating Officers Album', consisting of 581 images from disclosure. Either the content of these 'missing' 358 pictures were deemed too sensitive to disclose because they tended to show mischief on the part of police officers during 'informatives', or as the case may be, that 'DC Oakey', had taken some photographs which compromised the official version regarding where, and how the body of Sheila Caffell, was found, discovered, challenged, and left for dead, then killed elsewhere in the farmhouse. Maybe, 'DC 'Oakey photographed the rifle that was leaning against a first floor window (box room), prior to it being brought to Sheila's body during 'informatives', before it was replaced at the main bedroom window where PC Bird (SOCO) later captured it's presence, there in photograph, 23...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
You do not try to conceal the involvement of two detectives performing duties at a crime scene of such a big case for three decades, without their involvement causing the prosecution of Jeremy Bamber massive problems. What could such problems have been, and are?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Why deliberately keep the involvement of 'DC Henderson' (SOCO), and 'DC Oakey'(SOCO) secret?

There has to be a reason for this attempted deception. That reason could only have favoured Jeremy Bambers defence case. I believe I am right in believing that with Henderson and Oakey in the mix, there was a good chance it would have been discovered, that cops staged Sheila Caffells death scene in the main bedroom, with the rifle from the first floor window...

I know 100% that I am correct in thinking and believing that / this...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Why deliberately keep the involvement of 'DC Henderson' (SOCO), and 'DC Oakey'(SOCO) secret?

There has to be a reason for this attempted deception. That reason could only have favoured Jeremy Bambers defence case. I believe I am right in believing that with Henderson and Oakey in the mix, there was a good chance it would have been discovered, that cops staged Sheila Caffells death scene in the main bedroom, with the rifle from the first floor window...

I know 100% that I am correct in thinking and believing that / this...

I feel an appeal against conviction might be imminent, based on these very latest findings...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Three key negatives were cut from a strip of negative, at around the time PC Bird (SOCO) started to photograph Sheila's body. This could be significant as it fell at the time when the Photographing of Sheila's body with the gun was being captured by 'DC 'Oakey, and PC Bird was taking over 'that role'. Moreover, I seem to recollect somewhere in all of this, that 'Ron' Cook (SOCO) had given PC 'David' Bird specific instruction to 'make sure he photographed the position of the rifle on the body, correctly'...

That comment had always bothered me until now, I say that because if the rifle had actually been found on Sheila's body in the bedroom, no matter what angle PC Bird had photographed the body with the rifle in its possession, the position of the gun would have been correct from that or this angle. Now that I know 'DC 'Oakey had taken photograph No. 25 which shows the barrel of the rifle resting against the left side of Sheila's neck, it makes sense or at least I can see why the position of the rifles barrel was captured in a different position with its muzzle hovering above the two bullet entry wounds in the throat. With Cook barking the instruction to PC Bird for him to do this, it seems a perfectly reasonable assumption that PC Bird himself position the anshuzt rifle differently upon Sheila's body in order to reflect his own judgement, thus enabling him to take photographs, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33. The position of the rifles barrel upon the body of Sheila in those photographs being different to the position of the same when 'DC Oakey' took photograph 25. I seem to remember, sometime ago, to be precise a debate on the forum regarding the position of the guns barrel in relation to Sheila's neck, and it being postulated that the barrel of the rifle had not been in a different position in say 25, as opposed to the others, in 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33. The apparent difference was put down to the angle at which PC Bird had taken that (25) photograph. But it now turns out that PC Bird (SOCO) did not take that photograph at all, 'DC Oakey' did...
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 02:17:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The position of the guns barrel having been captured in a different position against, or hovering above the throat, by two separate SOC's, following different pathways of investigation. Oakey had not given much thought as to how he should photograph the rifle with the body in 25, whereas, in PC Birds case, he had been given specific instruction by 'Ron' Cook, to make sure that he 'got the position of the gun on the body, correct'...

We have to assume that PC Bird moved the rifle around upon Sheila's body until the muzzle end of the rifles barrel was basically hovering over that region of the throat where two bullet wounds had been inflicted, and that he then proceeded to take photographs, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33...
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 02:29:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
All of this, however, rendered the use of any crime scene photograph null and void, since it was a significant part of the prosecutions case, that Sheila's body had remained untouched, unmoved, it having been found exactly as the body had been photographed in on the bedroom floor in possession of the rifle which had been used to shoot and kill her. More significantly the prosecution relied heavily on the presence of blood said by expert opinion which was unique to Sheila found encapsulated inside a parker hale silencer in another part of the house. A silencer which the prosecution alleged had been fitted to the barrel of the rifle used to shoot and kill her. It was rather convenient that in so far as the silencer was concerned, that with it fitted to the barrel of the rifle (they asserted) the overall length of the weapon would have been much too long to enable Sheila to shoot herself with the gun so configured. How wonderful that the prospect of convicting Bamber relied upon Bamber himself realising the weapon he had supposedly used to shoot dead his sister with, was too long for him to stage his sisters death with and that he was forced to remove the silencer,  and stage her death scene without it...

If that were true, don't you think Bamber himself would have thought that cops might be able to tell via ballistic and medical evidence that a silencer had been fitted to the gun when his sister was killed?

I believe that cops knew the rifle with a silencer fitted to its barrel was too long to lay the blame for her own death at Sheila's feet, and that cops removed the silencer from the barrel of the rifle for that reason, and they concealed it in the cupboard in the den. Cook himself apparently searched the gun cupboard in the den and even looked inside the ammunition box which David Boutflour later found the silencer three days later. Cops had to have known about the silencer by virtue of the fact that the only rifle found upstairs was the anshuzt rifle which Jeapes and Brown saw leaning against a first floor window at 7.15am, and which by 10 am was photographed resting against the main bedroom window, and then upon Sheila Caffells body. How was it possible for Bamber to have staged his sister's death on the bedroom floor with the rifle at a first floor window, at a time when Bamber had no possibility of gaining access to the farmhouse after 7.15am? With the rifle against a first floor window by 7.15am, the second fatal shot could not yet have been fired, and any silencer which might possibly have been fitted to the gun, must have been fitted to the barrel of the gun at 7.15am, in order for it to be contaminated with Sheila's blood, when she was eventually shot and killed...

Rifle at first floor window. Sheila's body in the kitchen (7.37am), only three bodies upstairs by 8.10am. police surgeon pronouncing Sheila dead in the main bedroom at 8.44am, her body being described as being on the far side of the bed,  PC Bird Photographing the rifle against the main bedroom window (23), 'DC 'Oakey Photographing the rifle from the bedroom window now in possession of Sheila's body, the barrel of the gun resting against the left hand side of her neck (25), PC Bird Photographing the rifle which 'DC Oakey' had captured, in a different position upon Sheila's body (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33)...

Cops staged Sheila's death scene during 'informatives', and because to put it bluntly they literally made a pigs ear of the whole affair, they tried to bluff their way out of the responsibility for her death. They shot her, they killed her, and they tampered with the evidence initially to try to turn the investigation into one of four murders, and a suicide, when arguably it was basically a case of five murders, or at least four murders, and a manslaughter...
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 04:45:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
This brings me onto the topic of the consistency of the blood which poured from her mouth, and the upper bullet entry wound in Sheila's throat...

By the time 'DC Oakey' took photograph 25, Sheila had already been dead for just over an hour, not surprising then that the blood had started to dry, coagulate and crack.

the rate at which blood dried exiting the mouth, was more advanced than the rate at which blood from the fatal wound, flowed  out. For example, the blood around the mouth was dark looking and cracked, whereas only the edges of the blood flow from the neck wound had started to go dark coloured...

What this suggests to me, is that blood which leaked from the mouth dried and cracked because the flow of blood was not continuous, whereas from the fatal wound on the throat, the opposite was true...
« Last Edit: December 06, 2016, 08:02:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Since we now know that 'DC Oakey' captured the above image (25), prior to PC 'David' Bird (SOCO) capturing images, 26, 27, 28, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33, it cannot be just a coincidence that the consistency of blood flow from the upper throat wound appeared fresher in image 25, than the latter ones...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Imagine the impact upon the jury - being told that Sheila Caffells body had been found by armed police in the 'exact' position that PC Bird had captured her body in possession of the very rifle which had been used to shoot and kill her. When all a?omg, it was a sham. Cops had staged her death scene. Cops had not first found her body in the bedroom at all. They reported finding her in the kitchen (7.37am), and her body was not upstairs at all by 8.10am,  the find of four bodies upstairs would have been reported by that stage if Sheila's body had been present upstairs from the outset. Five dead in total, shouted out by 8.10am, two bodies, one male, and one female', present in the kitchen at 7.37 and 7.38am. One of these deaths reported as a murder, the other dead reported as a suicide. Staff in the incident room remotely eavesdropped the entry of the firearm officers into the kitchen. There were noises and voices (7.36am). What was overheard at that time and afterward via the telephone handset resting off its cradle upon the kitchen worktop which acted like a microphone, served only to confirm a message relayed by CA07 to the incident room (IR) at 7.37am '... and the body of one dead female in kitchen'. Followed by another message from CA07 a minute later 7.38am '... One dead female'. We therefore had a recorded consensus on which there was definitely two bodies in the kitchen from as I understand it, 7.37am, and nothing from anyone either at the scene, or who was relaying anything from the scene to the incident room, or even those present in the incident room listening in live to the situation using the telephone as a microphone, dissenting from that proposition...

In addition, we find that by 7.45am, that a staff member by the christikan name, 'Linda' was contacting 'DS Davidson from the control room to his home address, requesting him to come on duty to the office, because police at whf were dealing with 'two bodies', a male, and a fema, one death described as a murder, the other death described as being a suicide. Now, I do not profess to know where 'Linda' got her information from regarding one of the deaths being a suicide, but the fact s, she knew about the discovery f two bodies, that one of these two bodies was male and the other body was female (This was obviously known about as a result of the live eavesdrop of the entry into the kitchen, and the external information passed by CA07 at 7.37 and 7.3 8am message log contents. I can only assume that she either received the information about one of the two bodies that had been found being a murder (a reference to the body of Ralph Bamber), being in relation to the male body. However, there are no corresponding messages which refer to the death of the female in the kitchen, so I assume this information must have been gleaned during the eavesdrop of the conversation and activity being listened into, or that the contents of such a message have been edited out of the message logs, and t hey have been re-written for the purpose of presenting an alternative truth. Anyways, by 7.45am, that morning, the incident room, not only knew about the two bodies in the kitchen, they also knew that one of these bodies was a male, and the other body in the kitchen was a female. The incident room knew that one of these two bodies had been a murder, and that the other body had been reported as a suicide. The incident room knew all of this prior to the 7.45am, call which 'Linda' made to 'DS Davidson' at that precise time...

Ralph Bambers death, could in no way be described as being 'a suicide'...

This moves us on to the issue of the female body who had committed suicide prior to 7.45am?

More importantly, the identity of the second body in the sequence of discovery by 7.45am, since whichever body was stumbled upon in sequence in the grand scheme of things, had to be female, a female who had committed suicide?

It is regarded to be highly significant that there is no mention of a suicide been recorded in any police message log, whilst at the same time alluding to the fact that at precisely 7.45am, staff in the incident room knew about. This suggests to me that cops have edited out the all important messages which contain the cooling confirming that this was the state of play prior to the occasion when 'Linda' made the call to 'DS Davidson'.  Logs have been edited and possibly re-written to try to gloss over this matter. That issue aside, for one moment, let's concentrate upon the identity of the first body the armed officers stumbled upon upstairs?

June Bamber, her body close to the entrance of the main bedroom door - in no way could her death be considered or regarded as being 'suicide', she had been shot a total of 7 times in different parts of her body...

This leads to only one other conclusion. Reference to the discover of a dead female who was in the kitchen part of the farmhouse, who had committed suicide, could only have been a reference to the body of Sheila Caffell, since her death was the only death amongst the five victims which could arguably be described as a suicide. What we have, therefore, is a clear mandate of there having been two bodies found downstairs in the kitchen. The type of death these two unfortunate victims succeeded, was by way of a murder, and a suicide. We all know that the only death amongst the deaths of the five victims, is the death of Sheila Caffell ( her death could arguably be defined as a possible suicide). Therefore, without doubt, without question, the first two bodies that were found were the bodies of Ralph and Sheila...

But, with the body of June Bamber (a murder) situated at the main bedroom door, armed police would almost certainly have stumbled upon her body, before they came upon the body of Sheila, which in this explanation would have resulted in Sheila's death not being amongst the first two bodies found or stumbled upon. Her body would have been third in the sequence of discovery. The really important detail, however, is that with the potential discovery of June Bambers body second in the sequence, her death could only be described as a murder, her death was not suicide, and nobody present at the scene, or elsewhere could begin to describe her death as a suicide...

By 8.10am, with two bodies (one male and one female) already found in kitchen by 7.37am, and with only five victims killed, mathematics of accuracy dictate that the other three bodies must have been found upstairs afterward. This is true, the police message log content confirms ' a further three bodies found upstairs. Five dead in total's...

According to 'Linda' in the incident room, one of these five deaths had been reported as a suicide, she relayed this information at 7.45am, to DS Davidson at his home address. So, with this in mind, by 8.10am, the other three bodies had to be regarded as 'murder'...

Sheila Caffell did not die in the kitchen at 7.37am, she was not one of the three bodies found upstairs by 8.10am. However, she did find herself upstairs in the main bedroom by 8.44am, when the police surgeon, Dr Craig, pronounced her as being dead, there in the bedroom...

As such, it becomes impossible for Jeremy Bamber to have shot his sister twice in the main bedroom with use of the family owned rifle, and thereafter, staged her death scene for the purpose of fooling police into thinking that his sister had shot and killed the other four, and that she had then turned the gun upon herself, and taken her own life - how could he possibly have done any of this, having regard to all t be circumstances outlined?

The jury never heard any of this, because the prosecution and it's uniformed criminals deliberately 'fabricated a case' against Jeremy Bamber, to prevent the truth being made known public that armed cops had shot and killed an unarmed mentally ill suspect who had showed the rifle at a first floor window in terms which can best be described as a 'white flag of surrender', only to be shot in the kitchen, wrongly presumed dead, fled upstairs to the bedroom where she collapsed on top of the bed, wrongly presumed dead, again, only to be accidentally killed off during the performance of 'informatives' when the rifle was brought from a first floor window, and was being placed upon her body...

A bizarre set of circumstances...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Imagine the impact upon the jury - being told that Sheila Caffells body had been found by armed police in the 'exact' position that PC Bird had captured her body in possession of the very rifle which had been used to shoot and kill her. When all a?omg, it was a sham. Cops had staged her death scene. Cops had not first found her body in the bedroom at all. They reported finding her in the kitchen (7.37am), and her body was not upstairs at all by 8.10am,  the find of four bodies upstairs would have been reported by that stage if Sheila's body had been present upstairs from the outset. Five dead in total, shouted out by 8.10am, two bodies, one male, and one female', present in the kitchen at 7.37 and 7.38am. One of these deaths reported as a murder, the other dead reported as a suicide. Staff in the incident room remotely eavesdropped the entry of the firearm officers into the kitchen. There were noises and voices (7.36am). What was overheard at that time and afterward via the telephone handset resting off its cradle upon the kitchen worktop which acted like a microphone, served only to confirm a message relayed by CA07 to the incident room (IR) at 7.37am '... and the body of one dead female in kitchen'. Followed by another message from CA07 a minute later 7.38am '... One dead female'. We therefore had a recorded consensus on which there was definitely two bodies in the kitchen from as I understand it, 7.37am, and nothing from anyone either at the scene, or who was relaying anything from the scene to the incident room, or even those present in the incident room listening in live to the situation using the telephone as a microphone, dissenting from that proposition...

The ill intended excuse introduced by PC Collins regarding a mistake he claims he made regarding the sex of the body he saw in the kitchen from outside the window prior to entry being forced, rectified once he entered the kitchen, does not explain away the presence of a female body in addition to the male body which was found once he and the others got into the kitchen. If anything, all it does is account for the presence of the male body that was found after the cops entered the kitchen, a male body which PC Collins believed was a female. It may well be that Collins did not see the other body from the window, in which case, he rectified his mistake over the only body he saw once he got into the kitchen. He didn't see the female body, which was reported after cops got into the kitchen. More importantly the mention of a female body, came after mention of the male body...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Nothing any of the relatives could say, proves nothing to establish that Jeremy Bamber had killed anyone. Similarly, nothing Julie Mugford could say does either...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...