I didn't actually have that term in mind. But the remarks attributed to Julie, seem to be referring to the milder end of the scale?
Even if Julie had manufactured her comments and/or they were isolated comments about Bamber (Which were factual) and on the milder end of the scale; I find it difficult to believe a forensic psychologist/criminal profiler would ignore them, given the list of other traits known about Jeremy Bamber.
From the OS:
"If Jeremy was having a sexual relationship with another man or indeed a woman other than Julie, all this would illustrate was Jeremy’s infidelity and might or might not give some reflection as to his character. Equally it would still have no bearing on the crime in consideration. Many documents have colloquial language for the term homosexuality. Let me give you some examples of the reports where, the correct terminology was used but in a negative context. This excludes reports such as that prepared by DI Dickinson which is also littered with references to homosexual activity. For example in Ainsley’s two short reports of 1985. Here are some references:
“He fell in with criminal and Homosexual company”
“He met the witness Brett Collins who is homosexual”
Mugford claimed that Jeremy had openly admitted to her “at least one homosexual relationship”
Mugford claimed that Jeremy had been to “New Zealand and there had some type of homosexual relationship with a man named Jeff it is also at this time that he met Brett Collins.”
“It was on the 13th of August that Brett Collins, the Homosexual friend of Jeremy’s who had stayed with Jeremy prior to August 1985, returned from a holiday in Greece.”
“It is said that there he fell in with criminal and homosexual company.”
“He is considered by some who know him to be bisexual”
“Always looking for affection, especially from girls, a bisexual, a shallow person”
“He is also an admitted homosexual.” (re: Collins)
“In addition, Bamber himself is believed to have been involved in other homosexual associations.”
There is more evidence, documents go on to state that Julie had, “said Jeremy was gay,”[3] and further in 1991 DI Hammett describes his lunch with Robert Boutflour and notes that he had remarked on Jeremy’s “un-savoury homosexual character” and that he was seen out “with a feather in his ear.”[4] I have only touched on some examples of these attitudes amongst the case documents. There are many more examples but there is not the space to cover this comprehensively.........................................................
Again in isolation if Jeremy Bamber were bisexual I can understand why this fact could be dismissed, afterall being bisexual does not a murderer make.
But what if his homosexual activities were of a ego dystonic nature and/or if he is a psychopath and genderless?
"Psychopaths have no identity and only create one as needed.The following is worth reading as the comments have been written by psychopaths in relation to gender
http://psychopathsandlove.com/a-hidden-fact-of-psychopaths-they-have-no-gender/"The psychopath in my life told me about many of his sexual exploits that happened 'a long time ago' and he said he had sex with men as well as women. I asked him if he were bisexual, and he said he was not. He said it would be hard to explain. I had no idea at that time what his explanation could be.
