Author Topic: Public perception of Jeremy  (Read 1433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

clifford

  • Guest
Public perception of Jeremy
« on: May 09, 2011, 09:31:PM »
When I finished work today I decided to go for a pint The topic was about Jeremy, and his appeal.
There were folks there that knew the undertaker, his friends his enemies.
The common concensious was that he needed a new trial to confirm his guilt.
I was not surprised that few of them knew that all the evidence was circumstancial. None were privvy of Mikes excellent posts.None were aware of the in the interest of the Boutflours. None were aware that Ralph owned half of their farms. None were aware of the amount of silencers found at WHF. None were aware of the Pargeter Bruno rifle.None were aware of the changing of granny Speakmans will.None were aware that Mugford went on holiday with Jeremy after the murders. None were aware that she only dobbed Jeremy in after he dumped her.None were aware that the police were alledgy in conversation  with someone in the farm while JB was outside.None were aware about the number of guns at WHF.
I could go on, but I think I have made my point. There was more than twelve people in the pub [jury].
Thanks to you lot I left quite chuffed. They were still arguing when I left. I am still on the fence though.

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Public perception of Jeremy
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2011, 09:35:PM »
Cliff, before you filled everyone in, were they all anti-JB, or did anyone have any doubts?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17576
Re: Public perception of Jeremy
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2011, 09:36:PM »
When I finished work today I decided to go for a pint The topic was about Jeremy, and his appeal.
There were folks there that knew the undertaker, his friends his enemies.
The common concensious was that he needed a new trial to confirm his guilt.
I was not surprised that few of them knew that all the evidence was circumstancial. None were privvy of Mikes excellent posts.None were aware of the in the interest of the Boutflours. None were aware that Ralph owned half of their farms. None were aware of the amount of silencers found at WHF. None were aware of the Pargeter Bruno rifle.None were aware of the changing of granny Speakmans will.None were aware that Mugford went on holiday with Jeremy after the murders. None were aware that she only dobbed Jeremy in after he dumped her.None were aware that the police were alledgy in conversation  with someone in the farm while JB was outside.None were aware about the number of guns at WHF.
I could go on, but I think I have made my point. There was more than twelve people in the pub [jury].
Thanks to you lot I left quite chuffed. They were still arguing when I left. I am still on the fence though.

 ::) :D  Enjoyed reading that Cliff.  Job well done eh...

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Public perception of Jeremy
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2011, 09:44:PM »
Interesting.

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Public perception of Jeremy
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2011, 09:47:PM »
Cliff, before you filled everyone in, were they all anti-JB, or did anyone have any doubts?
Shona, most were anti JB. Because of the media most thought that they knew most of the facts. To be honest so did I. Although I did have my doubts, this forum has only compounded my doubts.
There are some really good posters here [and some w******]. Most of the posters are unbiased, which makes it compelling. [Wish Mike would,nt sit on the fence though] Joke don,t smite.

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Public perception of Jeremy
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2011, 09:54:PM »
I never smite, Cliff, I simply don't know enough to judge, and I post some absolute crap sometimes. I admire what you did in the pub, though.  I bet they're still talking about it now.