neville;s blood trail

[sami]

If I saw him as a threat why would I continue debating him on the other forum? enough said..

Since he has made no appearance In the last two month, I have tried to contact him but to no avail.

its a shame david cause ive read both your posts and it was a verygood debate good explanations from both sides,so its just upto the person reading them to pick a side

[Caroline]

its a shame david cause ive read both your posts and it was a verygood debate good explanations from both sides,so its just upto the person reading them to pick a side

Some people ask why the guilty side post when Jeremy is behind bars. When they stop. it because he's as good as free. What complete rot! People have lives, things happen that are more important than this place. There is nothing new to discuss, we go around and around and and it gets old. Scipio didn't run away from anyone, least of all - from David. This is yet another instance of him bigging himself up.

[Jane]

Caroline Lemonhead/Scipio sent me a PM some while back, he as good as said the same as you and the site exists for certain people to spread their propaganda it seems, nothing new will come up because there is nothing?

Justice, when I first joined -believing Jeremy was innocent- we were given to believe that his release was imminent. We were told there was categorical proof, in pictures, of his innocence. Over time, because these pictures failed to materialise, it became clear that it wasn't so. The same cant is still being touted, albeit, worded differently.

[guest7363]

Justice, when I first joined -believing Jeremy was innocent- we were given to believe that his release was imminent. We were told there was categorical proof, in pictures, of his innocence. Over time, because these pictures failed to materialise, it became clear that it wasn't so. The same cant is still being touted, albeit, worded differently.

Thats true Jane, numerous posters have changed from innocent to guilty, I cannot think of one vise versa? 

[sami]

Justice, when I first joined -believing Jeremy was innocent- we were given to believe that his release was imminent. We were told there was categorical proof, in pictures, of his innocence. Over time, because these pictures failed to materialise, it became clear that it wasn't so. The same cant is still being touted, albeit, worded differently.

yes jane thats a favorite ploy of theirs .but i think we all know now that jb will die in prison

[sami]

Thats true Jane, numerous posters have changed from innocent to guilty, I cannot think of one vise versa?

correct justice.also no one famous has also swapped sides to innocent. i think there have been a couple of them who have changed from innocent to guilty

[guest7363]

Oh stop.  Bamber is behind bars and has been for over three decades, he has no genuine chance of the CCRC choosing to refer his case to the COA again and the CCRC were found to have come to their decision lawfully. McKay seemed like Bambers best chance in years and he has now abandoned ship leaving unnamed law professionals apparently working for him but not willing to publicly back him.

All Bamber has left are :

1). A campaign team that contiinue to disgrace him and bring him the worst press and public opinion that he has had since his trial, he's now seen like a mini Charles Manson able to order his supporters to do his bidding for him from behind bars.

2.) A few supporters on forums that seem to still be bringing up rubbish like a phone call from Neville, police killing Sheila etc...... NOT because the CCRC will ever take this seriously but because they want to 'win' on a forum that they've put so much of their time into, it's almost not about Bamber anymore but more "Look what I've found" "Praise me for this".

Of course, there are some genuine supporters but they have gotten less and less over the years as alot of people have even been discarded or change their stance on the case.

Number 2, now that reminds me of someone?

[guest7363]

correct justice.also no one famous has also swapped sides to innocent. i think there have been a couple of them who have changed from innocent to guilty

Even Brett Collins changed his mind, reading the Deviant?

[Caroline]

Oh stop.  Bamber is behind bars and has been for over three decades, he has no genuine chance of the CCRC choosing to refer his case to the COA again and the CCRC were found to have come to their decision lawfully. McKay seemed like Bambers best chance in years and he has now abandoned ship leaving unnamed law professionals apparently working for him but not willing to publicly back him.

All Bamber has left are :

1). A campaign team that contiinue to disgrace him and bring him the worst press and public opinion that he has had since his trial, he's now seen like a mini Charles Manson able to order his supporters to do his bidding for him from behind bars.

2.) A few supporters on forums that seem to still be bringing up rubbish like a phone call from Neville, police killing Sheila etc...... NOT because the CCRC will ever take this seriously but because they want to 'win' on a forum that they've put so much of their time into, it's almost not about Bamber anymore but more "Look what I've found" "Praise me for this".

Of course, there are some genuine supporters but they have gotten less and less over the years as alot of people have even been discarded or change their stance on the case.

Spot on Mat!

[David1819]

Even Brett Collins changed his mind, reading the Deviant?

Oh Dear. You actually believe that phone call between Brett and PH took place? How convenient PH gets random letters and phone calls from witnesses. Its also very strange he quotes "new evidence" from the dead. He has claimed not long ago that he always believed Jeremy was guilty, this exposes him as a liar one way or the other. He changes his mind then suddenly remembers a damning conversation he had with the now deceased Ed Lawson back in 2002 

It sais allot about the evidence against Jeremy when an author pushing for guilt has to make evidence up. The fact such a book has been published actually does Jeremy a favour.

[guest7363]

Oh Dear. You actually believe that phone call between Brett and PH took place? How convenient PH gets random letters and phone calls from witnesses. Its also very strange he quotes "new evidence" from the dead. He has claimed not long ago that he always believed Jeremy was guilty, this exposes him as a liar one way or the other. He changes his mind then suddenly remembers a damning conversation he had with the now deceased Ed Lawson back in 2002 

It sais allot about the evidence against Jeremy when an author pushing for guilt has to make evidence up. The fact such a book has been published actually does Jeremy a favour.

Strange how Brett has never come out in support of his mate?

[sami]

lets get back to the topic ,not a drop of blood on the upstairs landing or the stairs

[sami]

Now run along and do your usual tale-telling,rotti. Can't stand them either.

lookout you yourself have said you dont think sheila fired the first shot because of where it struck the bone.

[lookout]

Hope not Lookout here's mine,

http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/21/worlds-ugliest-dog-contest-2014-top-10-photos-4770587/#&gid=1&pid=8

Aw,I don't think that's ugly.Just unfortunate.

[lookout]

lookout you yourself have said you dont think sheila fired the first shot because of where it struck the bone.

I still don't.