DC Hammersley falsified his pocketbook entries, relating to silencer

[mike tesko]

DC Hammersley falsified his pocketbook entries, relating to silencer

If police seized a silencer (SBJ/1) during the early stages of their investigation, then of course one of the exhibits officers (DS Davidson and DC Hammersely) would have had to be in on it?

We now know, that DS "Stan" Jones, seized four exhibits from the scene on 7th August 1985 - SBJ/4, SBJ/3, SBJ/2 and SBJ/1, and that on 9th August 1985, both DS Jones, and DCI "Taff" Jones, visited Jeremy at his cottage, 9 Head Street, Goldhanger, and questioned Jeremy about whether or not the silencer was fitted to the gun on the evening before the shootings?

If police did originally find or take possession of a silencer from the scene on 7th August 1985, then of course, one of the two exhibit officers would have dealt with the silencer in question (without doubt)...

I am able to report disturbing developments relating to the pocketbook entries of one of those exhibit officers, which relate to mention of the silencer, dated, 9th August 1985 - I am currently in the process of updating Jeremy about my findings...

The following attachments bear witness to this disturbing new development:-

[mike tesko]

Key Evidence, uncovered - silencer scam

Note, page 35 contents, followed by page 36 contents?

[mike tesko]

It now becomes apparent why DS "Stan" Jones also had to falsify his own pocketbook entries:-

[Hartley]

Do you have a copy of the CID 6 forms referred to?

[sc82]

I can barely read a word of that!

[Alias]

I can barely read a word of that!

Neither can I.

[Hartley]

I can read it, but I don't follow where Mike says its been falsified or what it implies.

[FredPerry]

It now becomes apparent why DS "Stan" Jones also had to falsify his own pocketbook entries:-

Does it, where and why??

[mike tesko]

I can read it, but I don't follow where Mike says its been falsified or what it implies.

----------------------

I need to speak to Jeremy urgently first before I lay everything out, but there are big clues in the attached images:-

Pages 32, 33 and 34, do not have any paper clips attached, whereas all the others do...

Pages, 35, 77, 78 and 36 have paper clips attached, indicating "added notes" which have been inserted into that part of the narrative...

[Hartley]

I still don't follow, sorry. 

Pages, 35, 77, 78 and 36 have paper clips attached, indicating "added notes" which have been inserted into that part of the narrative...

Why does it indicate that? 

[clifford]

I can barely read a word of that!

Neither can I.

Thank god for that, I can cancel my appointment wth Spec savers.

[mike tesko]

it is now known that DC Hammersly used the pages from three separate pocketbooks to falsify evidence about the find and recovery of the silencer (SBJ/1) by DS Jones from the scene, on the 7th August 1985 - pages from these different p/books were attached together in the same p/book by use of paper clips, so that when the material was photocopied, it appeared to have been recorded in the same p/book, not three separate ones...

[Hartley]

Or maybe paper clips were used as book marks?

Do you have evidence of this? Or is it just a theory?

[grahameb]

I can barely read a word of that!

Neither can I. I thought doctors wrote badly. But with that I might as well be blind.

[Roch]

Or maybe paper clips were used as book marks?

Do you have evidence of this? Or is it just a theory?

Would it be worth trying to isolate the defence arguments in to separate categories, each with their respective paperwork? (i.e. statements, pocket book entries, reports etc). 

Then, compare the number of apparent anomalies held within those respective paper records, for example, crossings out, dates altered, paper clip marks, conflicting versions etc etc. 

If the paperwork relating to any one particular category contains a high number of anomalies, then that might give an indication there is something fishy, regarding that issue. 

So if you had a chart with peaks and troughs, I'm suspecting that the silencer category might translate as a considerable peak, whereas other categories may not.