Most on here are guilters.

[Caroline]

Mathew Macdonald went around bragging that he was a mercenary because he enjoyed the attention. It's in his police statements. A Mercinary and a Hitman are essentially the same thing. Mercinaries are usually ex Military doing private work and that includes being a Hitman.

I have heard all your excuses for Mugsie many times before, No need to repeat them. The fact you know she is a liar and not a credible witness but continue to defend her in order to justify your position just shows you are fraud.

I have heard all of your twists and they make me laugh because each time you do it, you just become more amusing! 

Saw this and thought of you!

[David1819]

According to you. However, it was accepted.

If a fool chooses to accept her words as truth then that's their problem.

[sami]

If a fool chooses to accept her words as truth then that's their problem.

10 'fools' did accept her words as the truth and it became a big problem for jb no one else

[David1819]

I have heard all of your twists and they make me laugh because each time you do it, you just become more amusing! 

Saw this and thought of you!

Saw this and thought of you!

[David1819]

10 'fools' did accept her words as the truth and it became a big problem for jb no one else

No they didn't. Their decision was based on the blood evidence in the silencer, Iv shown you the relevant trial transcript

[guest7363]

Saw this and thought of you!

These joke pictures he keeps pulling out must be out of his crime scene photo portfolio

[sami]

No they didn't. Their decision was based on the blood evidence in the silencer, Iv shown you the relevant trial transcript

so what your saying is they ignored all the evidence and only found him guilty because of blood in the silence.nonsense

[David1819]

so what your saying is they ignored all the evidence and only found him guilty because of blood in the silence.nonsense

Read the trial transcripts and see for yourself

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,381.msg5351.html#msg5351

[sami]

Read the trial transcripts and see for yourself

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,381.msg5351.html#msg5351

they asked for clarification of the blood found inside silencer to add to what other bits of evidence they saw to indicate jb's guilt

[Caroline]

Saw this and thought of you!

Yes, you are VERY selective.

[Caroline]

No they didn't. Their decision was based on the blood evidence in the silencer, Iv shown you the relevant trial transcript

You were in the jury room now? They asked for clarification about the blood in the silencer but not having been in the jury room, you have no idea what else they found relevant - but don't let that stop you from more assumption!

[Jane]

What or who made Julie make this up a month after the murders?

So what did he ring her for? Or are all the residents of Julie's house liars?

[guest154]

No they didn't. Their decision was based on the blood evidence in the silencer, Iv shown you the relevant trial transcript

What does the trial transcript have to do with the jury decision? The trial transcript can show you what the jury saw and heard... but it doesn't include their deliberations.

[Jane]

If a fool chooses to accept her words as truth then that's their problem.

I guess the same applies to the fool who accept yours then.

[Jane]

No they didn't. Their decision was based on the blood evidence in the silencer, Iv shown you the relevant trial transcript

Oh!!! So now. I suppose, we add clairvoyant to your ever growing list of accomplishments?