Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?

[sami]

Another assumption you get wrong.

Strange how its only you that makes these allegations against me. What is everyone else not seeing that you are?  The bacon is all in your mind. In other words you are solipsist

how is the poll going .'will jb get 3rd appeal

[Caroline]

Another assumption you get wrong.

Strange how its only you that makes these allegations against me. What is everyone else not seeing that you are?  The bacon is all in your mind. In other words you are solipsist

So you're saying you have official crime scene pictures? Then post the evidence!

So you didn't tell the IA board that you have a vast amount of information (which you had to get from here) and didn't bother promoting this board or give Mike the credit?

I'm not the only one to believe you are self serving, there are others here who think the same.

You're about as ham an actor as JB is, must be why you mention bacon is every post - or is that an attempt to goad? Keep it up - it's you who is looking like an arse. Also, if you can email me the picture you PM'd me about (and no I won't be nice to you), you could post it on the forum for everyone to scrutinise.

I think it's best if we put each other on ignore, I'm not interested in discussing anything with you.

[David1819]

So you're saying you have official crime scene pictures? Then post the evidence!

So you didn't tell the IA board that you have a vast amount of information (which you had to get from here) and didn't bother promoting this board or give Mike the credit?

I'm not the only one to believe you are self serving, there are others here who think the same.

You're about as ham an actor as JB is, must be why you mention bacon is every post - or is that an attempt to goad? Keep it up - it's you who is looking like an arse. Also, if you can email me the picture you PM'd me about (and no I won't be nice to you), you could post it on the forum for everyone to scrutinise.

I became interested with this case with honest intentions and it remains like that to this very day.

The idea you have of me as a dishonest liar with a self serving agenda is nothing but an illusion in your mind. The mind often employs mental gymnastics as a way of dealing with cognitive dissonance. You have such a high and inflated belief in your "intuition" and self proclaimed ability to read people, once you are faced with the possibility of that being wrong a process of self-manipulation begins in order to justify your unjustifiable or irrational positions.

I suppose you could just admit to getting something wrong but that's too difficult for some

[sami]

I became interested with this case with honest intentions and it remains like that to this very day.

The idea you have of me as a dishonest liar with a self serving agenda is nothing but an illusion in your mind. The mind often employs mental gymnastics as a way of dealing with cognitive dissonance. You have such a high and inflated belief in your "intuition" and self proclaimed ability to read people, once you are faced with the possibility of that being wrong a process of self-manipulation begins in order to justify your unjustifiable or irrational positions.

I suppose you could just admit to getting something wrong but that's too difficult for some

she has admitted she was wrong about jb'when she thought he was innocent.a fact you seem very happy to throw in her face everytime youre stuck

[Caroline]

I became interested with this case with honest intentions and it remains like that to this very day.

The idea you have of me as a dishonest liar with a self serving agenda is nothing but an illusion in your mind. The mind often employs mental gymnastics as a way of dealing with cognitive dissonance. You have such a high and inflated belief in your "intuition" and self proclaimed ability to read people, once you are faced with the possibility of that being wrong a process of self-manipulation begins in order to justify your unjustifiable or irrational positions.

I suppose you could just admit to getting something wrong but that's too difficult for some

I don't have anything wrong. But now you're self proclaimed psychologist as well as a forensic expert? You're unbelievable and completely deluded! I 100% believe you are self serving and as such, I have no wish to discuss anything with you. You said I was wrong about you not having access to the crime scene pictures - so put your money where your mouth is and prove it.  Let us ALL see them!

[Caroline]

she has admitted she was wrong about jb'when she thought he was innocent.a fact you seem very happy to throw in her face everytime youre stuck

I have no problem admitting I am wrong. This isn't about me, or David or any other member - it's about the deaths of 5 people and I think through the BS, that often gets lost. They were REAL people not faces on the internet to be picked over.

I'm not here to 'crack the case' or win brownie points with anyone. If I am wrong, it wouldn't bother me one iota and if Jeremy did turn out to be innocent (fat chance), good luck to him. If he manages to get off on a technicality, good luck to him also. What I would say though, if you have been trusted with information from Jeremy's legal team, then perhaps you shouldn't mention it on an open forum - if you do mention it then can't produce it, you shouldn't be surprised when people are sceptical. We've all been here before on this forum!

[guest7363]

I don't care if they can sing God Save The Queen, Jeremy said he SAW them.

HaHa like it.

[guest7363]

Hahahahaha!! 

Suppose I could ask Bamber.... but he didn't SEE them he HEARD them, well according to him.

Yes he was jealous of the rabbits, because they were millionHares and listening to HipHop music.

[guest7363]

I have no problem admitting I am wrong. This isn't about me, or David or any other member - it's about the deaths of 5 people and I think through the BS, that often gets lost. They were REAL people not faces on the internet to be picked over.

I'm not here to 'crack the case' or win brownie points with anyone. If I am wrong, it wouldn't bother me one iota and if Jeremy did turn out to be innocent (fat chance), good luck to him. If he manages to get off on a technicality, good luck to him also. What I would say though, if you have been trusted with information from Jeremy's legal team, then perhaps you shouldn't mention it on an open forum - if you do mention it then can't produce it, you shouldn't be surprised when people are sceptical. We've all been here before on this forum!

Great post Caroline, I was told personal information about Bamber from a psychiatrist I won't reveal it because I cannot then back it up unless I get this person on here which I doubt very much.  David likes to get rid of opposition who is better than him, he did it with Lemonhead/Scipio, shame because at one time he was a good poster.

[sami]

Yes he was jealous of the rabbits, because they were millionHares and listening to HipHop music.

[David1819]

Great post Caroline, I was told personal information about Bamber from a psychiatrist I won't reveal it because I cannot then back it up unless I get this person on here which I doubt very much. 

A psychiatrist's opinion of ones mental state does not take precedence over physical and forensic evidence. You take the word a doctor that does not honour physician–patient confidentiality? I would be having reservations if I was you.

David likes to get rid of opposition who is better than him, he did it with Lemonhead/Scipio, shame because at one time he was a good poster.

It was Mike that banned Scipio not me. As for the situation with Scipio now, he seems to have given up on arguing for JBs guilt. He has not signed in on red for a few months now and he does not reply to my e-mails either. He could be ill or something of that nature but I hope not.   

[sami]

A psychiatrist's opinion of ones mental state does not take precedence over physical and forensic evidence. You take the word a doctor that does not honour physician–patient confidentiality? I would be having reservations if I was you.

It was Mike that banned Scipio not me. As for the situation with Scipio now, he seems to have given up on arguing for JBs guilt. He has not signed in on red for a few months now and he does not reply to my e-mails either. He could be ill or something of that nature but I hope not.   

if physical and forensic evidence was really there would jb be where he is today.i doubt it

[guest7363]

A psychiatrist's opinion of ones mental state does not take precedence over physical and forensic evidence. You take the word a doctor that does not honour physician–patient confidentiality? I would be having reservations if I was you.

It was Mike that banned Scipio not me. As for the situation with Scipio now, he seems to have given up on arguing for JBs guilt. He has not signed in on red for a few months now and he does not reply to my e-mails either. He could be ill or something of that nature but I hope not.   

Who said confidentiality was broke?  We live in a world where people write books about anyone or thing, these people don't need to write because Bamber is in his rightful place.

[sami]

we better get back to the topic or maggie will lock it.why didnt jb put the silencer on i know he was in a hurry to get the rabbits but screwing the silencer on would have taken him seconds and would undoubtably help him get the lot.did he know something about silencer.like it might contain traces of blood

[Romeo]

did he know something about silencer.like it might contain traces of blood

I seem to remember reading that the sights of a silencer need to be set for different ranges.....was this what JB was doing outside of WHF that night?