I am looking forward to a breakdown on how Sheila committed the massacre. Which was requested twice to the same poster yesterday on this thread.
This has been asked before but has been asked in this thread as a claim has been made that there is no evidence of Bamber's guilt. So it must be Sheila, right ?
The breakdown can be basic but must match the bullet allocations and body locations and include two rifle chambers/reloads, two phone calls and one fight.
There are over a hundred pieces of forensic evidence which show Sheila did not commit the massacre. Even if there wasn't, the fact that no one can give a breakdown of how Sheila could committ the massacre to match the forensic evidence, is already enough.