Author Topic: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:  (Read 10248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #105 on: September 30, 2016, 09:07:PM »
According to the police radio message logs, a fourth body was never found upstairs...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #106 on: September 30, 2016, 09:13:PM »
Once Jeapes spotted the rifle leaning against an upper floor window, she made a point of fixing her gaze upon it, ready to report to the forward control point manned by PS Adams, Montgomery, Harris, Gibbons and Clarke, at first instant it disappeared - Jeapes made no report suggesting the rifle had moved away from the window at any stage. It remained at the window upstairs until she left the scene with other firearm officers at around 9am...

By 9.13am, the rifle was brought to Sheila's body from 'that' window - it fired the fatal shot which killed her...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #107 on: September 30, 2016, 09:15:PM »
The shocking truth is that Sheila Caffell still lived for over one and a half hours after police entered the farmhouse, and she did not shoot herself...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #108 on: September 30, 2016, 09:21:PM »
The shocking truth is that Sheila Caffell still lived for over one and a half hours after police entered the farmhouse, and she did not shoot herself...

How could she have possibly died from being shot not once, but twice by use of the anshuzt rifle that for almost two continuous hours had remained untouched against an upstairs window, being constantly monitored by a trained firearms instructor?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #109 on: September 30, 2016, 09:37:PM »
Alarm bells are ringing out loud and clear...

Lets set out the now known facts :-

With the rifle at an upstairs window from 7.15am onward, and remaining there for almost two hours until 9.13am, how could police hope to maintain that Sheila had been shot and killed downstairs in the kitchen (police message log contents), or found shot upstairs in the bedroom (witness statement accounts) whilst ever the said rifle remained unmoved resting against some upstairs window, or other, and the police come up with a claim of suicide downstairs in the region of the kitchen, and a suicide upstairs in the bedroom, both accounts relying upon an impossible claim that the rifle from the upstairs window had been used in both suicide scenarios, when if the truth be known Sheila had not used the rifle at all to shoot herself with, either downstairs in the kitchen, or upstairs in the bedroom...

Her suicide, whether downstairs in the kitchen, or upstairs in the bedroom, were clearly arranged and involved the staging of her body in the bedroom, as though she had always been in possession of the rifle from the window, which of course was not true...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #110 on: September 30, 2016, 09:41:PM »
Alarm bells are ringing out loud and clear...

Lets set out the now known facts :-

With the rifle at an upstairs window from 7.15am onward, and remaining there for almost two hours until 9.13am, how could police hope to maintain that Sheila had been shot and killed downstairs in the kitchen (police message log contents), or found shot upstairs in the bedroom (witness statement accounts) whilst ever the said rifle remained unmoved resting against some upstairs window, or other, and the police come up with a claim of suicide downstairs in the region of the kitchen, and a suicide upstairs in the bedroom, both accounts relying upon an impossible claim that the rifle from the upstairs window had been used in both suicide scenarios, when if the truth be known Sheila had not used the rifle at all to shoot herself with, either downstairs in the kitchen, or upstairs in the bedroom...

Her suicide, whether downstairs in the kitchen, or upstairs in the bedroom, were clearly arranged and involved the staging of her body in the bedroom, as though she had always been in possession of the rifle from the window, which of course was not true...

The anshuzt rifle did not fire the first shot across Sheila's neck downstairs, but it was used to inflict the fatal head shot upstairs in the bedroom...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #111 on: September 30, 2016, 09:47:PM »
The anshuzt rifle did not fire the first shot across Sheila's neck downstairs, but it was used to inflict the fatal head shot upstairs in the bedroom...

Look into the ballistic evidence concerning bullets PV/19 and PV/20 - no suspicions around PV/19, but the same cannot be said for bullet PV/20. This is because police introduced a substituted bullet which had been test fired via the rifle afterwards, to replace the round fired by the other weapon...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Mike are you going to join Lookout and contribute to the campaign to raise £4,000p ?


I think that is a bit of a personal question . Mike has spent hundreds perhaps even thousands of hours on this case. I think his commitment is obvious. And I don't think any of us needs to know the answer to your question.

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Nobody pulled Sheila forward. She was sitting leaning against the bedside cabinet after the first shot. She then shuffled forward to afford a better position for the second. Simple.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Plus the pull back from the rifle would have shifted her.