Author Topic: The twins.  (Read 7252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: The twins.
« Reply #30 on: July 30, 2016, 03:41:PM »
Depends on your scenario.
Do you believe that Sheila would have been compliant Caroline?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44329
Re: The twins.
« Reply #31 on: July 30, 2016, 03:53:PM »
Buddy can you please explain how Sheila committed the massacre. Third request.

You've given snippets yesterday and today -

Sheila shot the twins first because one was sucking his thumb.

Neville woke and was shot in the twins bedroom.

Sheila had an accomplice who was waiting downstairs for Neville.

Both Sheila and her accomplice allowed Neville to phone Bamber and the police.


A lot more explaining is needed for everything to fit into place.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2016, 04:01:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44329
Re: The twins.
« Reply #32 on: July 30, 2016, 06:52:PM »
Look forward to reading Buddy's breakdown tomorrow.

I'm sure she's working on it now.

Debate well. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: The twins.
« Reply #33 on: July 30, 2016, 08:03:PM »
Neville woke and was shot in the twins room. The evidence does not show this.

Who was waiting for him downstairs ?

If Neville woke, got shot in the twins room, and was then instantly confronted downstairs, when did he phone Bamber and the police ?
Excuse me Adam but you have misquoted buddy, he said he thought Nevill woke and 'went towards the twins room' he did not say he 'was shot in the twins room' you are putting words in buddy's mouth.  It is quite feasible to think that is what Nevill did because I am sure in such a situation the twins safety would be the first thought for all the adults.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2016, 08:06:PM by maggie »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: The twins.
« Reply #34 on: July 30, 2016, 08:57:PM »
Excuse me Adam but you have misquoted buddy, he said he thought Nevill woke and 'went towards the twins room' he did not say he 'was shot in the twins room' you are putting words in buddy's mouth.  It is quite feasible to think that is what Nevill did because I am sure in such a situation the twins safety would be the first thought for all the adults.

Maggie, you've probably noticed that it's Adam's regular habit to misquote/twist/put words into mouths. It provides him with a chance to do what he does best, ie sneer and deride to bolster his own ego, then whine like a child that he's the victim of malice and is being goaded.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: The twins.
« Reply #35 on: July 30, 2016, 09:32:PM »
No one knows who was shot first or last. Buddy's reason yesterday that one of the twins was sucking his thumb has been dismissed.

Twins were shot first. Crime scene shows this and the authorities worked this out. That is how it ended up in Julies September 23rd statement.

Twins were shot first, hence Daniel and Nicholas consist of murder charges count one and two. Sheila being shot last thus she is murder charge count five.





Sheila menstrating during the massacre ? That is a new reason to kill you're family.

Of 50 women charged with crimes of violence, 44% committed their offence during the paramenstruum (P < 0ยท02) and there was a significant lack of offences during the ovulatory and post-ovulatory phases of the menstrual cycle


If Sheila shot the twins first, what was Neville doing at this time ?
Either still in bed and woke from the shots, or downstairs calling for help

Yes Sheila was sitting up when shot. Experts in the 2002 appeal said Sheila's legs were pulled after the second shot. Thread created. Lookout disagreed this again shows Bamber as 100% guilty. Saying it was 'my leg being pulled'.

Yes your leg is being pulled. see below
« Last Edit: July 30, 2016, 09:34:PM by David1819 »

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The twins.
« Reply #36 on: July 30, 2016, 09:44:PM »
david ive asked you to explain why you think the crime scene shows the twins were killed first :)

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: The twins.
« Reply #37 on: July 30, 2016, 09:59:PM »
david ive asked you to explain why you think the crime scene shows the twins were killed first :)

And I have given you my explanation multiple times

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The twins.
« Reply #38 on: July 30, 2016, 10:00:PM »
And I have given you my explanation multiple times
direct me to the post that explains it

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48675
Re: The twins.
« Reply #39 on: July 30, 2016, 10:23:PM »
 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)---here we go again.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The twins.
« Reply #40 on: July 30, 2016, 10:26:PM »
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)---here we go again.
well having a thumb in his mouth shows the twins were killed first,according to david ;)

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48675
Re: The twins.
« Reply #41 on: July 30, 2016, 10:29:PM »
So you believe that scenario ? After the impact of a rifle at close quarters ??

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The twins.
« Reply #42 on: July 30, 2016, 10:31:PM »
So you believe that scenario ? After the impact of a rifle at close quarters ??
i believe they were killed last

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48675
Re: The twins.
« Reply #43 on: July 30, 2016, 10:37:PM »
Believe what you like,we're ALL entitled too our OWN views.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: The twins.
« Reply #44 on: July 30, 2016, 10:53:PM »
well having a thumb in his mouth shows the twins were killed first,according to david ;)

That's not my reasons try reading my posts