Author Topic: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.  (Read 23537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #270 on: July 22, 2016, 04:17:PM »
oh i see.that incident in the fields happened when sc was teenager ,did they let the farm hand involved remain working on the farm
I don't think it has ever been mentioned Sami.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #271 on: July 22, 2016, 04:17:PM »
I have given you the answer. I can only explain it to you, I cannot understand it for you
where is the answer youve given ,what number post.crimescene shows twins killed first :)

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #272 on: July 22, 2016, 04:19:PM »
She used to stay in bed during the week and save her energy for her sons' weekend stay. She had so little energy or awareness of her surroundings her hair was dirty and she had B.O. She showed all the signs of overdose of Haloperidol as it had built up in her system, which was why the medication was reduced by half. At the house party you mention she was spaced out, she had a vacant stare and asked to leave early. Ditto the journey to White House Farm and the evidence of the Tiptree shopkeeper.

It really won't do you any good to live in denial and I just hope that Colin doesn't read some of the posts on this site.
here here steve well said

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #273 on: July 22, 2016, 04:20:PM »
I don't think it has ever been mentioned Sami.
could be interesting

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #274 on: July 22, 2016, 04:36:PM »
JM was given idea's from the family, and coerced into identifying the twins.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #275 on: July 27, 2016, 07:22:PM »
JM was given idea's from the family, and coerced into identifying the twins.




I would agree there. I wonder how much more dosh changed hands !

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #276 on: July 27, 2016, 08:29:PM »
She used to stay in bed during the week and save her energy for her sons' weekend stay. She had so little energy or awareness of her surroundings her hair was dirty and she had B.O. She showed all the signs of overdose of Haloperidol as it had built up in her system, which was why the medication was reduced by half. At the house party you mention she was spaced out, she had a vacant stare and asked to leave early. Ditto the journey to White House Farm and the evidence of the Tiptree shopkeeper.

It really won't do you any good to live in denial and I just hope that Colin doesn't read some of the posts on this site.

She didn't do these things because she was drugged but because she was in the depths of depression.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #277 on: July 27, 2016, 08:40:PM »
She didn't do these things because she was drugged but because she was in the depths of depression.


On that point we're in total agreement.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #278 on: July 27, 2016, 10:10:PM »
Drugged ? What with ? Apart from revenge.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #279 on: July 28, 2016, 07:46:AM »
Drugged ? What with ? Apart from revenge.


I think you've got the wrong end of the stick if it's Lebaleb's post you're responding to.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #280 on: July 28, 2016, 09:39:AM »

I think you've got the wrong end of the stick if it's Lebaleb's post you're responding to.




No,I haven't,as I don't believe that she was drugged up at all.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #281 on: July 28, 2016, 11:30:AM »



No,I haven't,as I don't believe that she was drugged up at all.

I agree, she wasn't, the autopsy report proves this, just her anti psych drugs and traces of cannabis.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #282 on: July 28, 2016, 01:29:PM »



No,I haven't,as I don't believe that she was drugged up at all.


Lebaleb's post doesn't suggest that she was.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #283 on: July 28, 2016, 01:55:PM »

Lebaleb's post doesn't suggest that she was.





I wasn't responding to lebaleb's post as I confess to not having read it. All I noticed was the mention of drugs as in medication or otherwise.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Bathroom window: Quick Q & A's and a conclusion.
« Reply #284 on: July 28, 2016, 02:11:PM »




I wasn't responding to lebaleb's post as I confess to not having read it. All I noticed was the mention of drugs as in medication or otherwise.

You said in one of your posts that you don't believe "she was drugged up at all" and you'd be correct in that assessment. The autopsy showed that, other than a trace element of cannabis, the only other drugs in her system were those prescribed so quite obviously, she wasn't "drugged up".