Private Communications, between "David Shaw" and "Mike Tesko" (2006)

[Jan]

I actually thought that too for a while.  My only doubt is that the writing style seems more than he is capable of but maybe he deteriorated before I came on the scene.

So when did you start deteriorating ?

[grahameb]

I see they're up to their regular bit of Tesko bashing again.

[nugnug]

A perfect sign of your irraitonal bias and why you are willing to believe the most stupid claims imaginable despite no evidence at all...

Police looked inside the kitchen windows before they broke in- any sign of Sheila?  Nope.

Police broken down the door any log messages to suggest she was alive in the kitchen at all let alone that they had to open fire because she was there holding a gun?  No

Any physical evidence to suggest she was shot int he kitchen? No

Any reason why if they did shoot her in the kitchen because she was there with a gun that they would need to conceal it?  No, that is a good shooting.

Any reason they would need to concela police shot her then?  No

If they wanted less paperwork so to claim she killed herself any need to move her body to stage it upstairs?  No.

Who believes this kind of tripe then?

People totally lacking in any common sense or critical thinking skills and totally consumed by irraitonal bias.

people who actully how the police actually work rather.

rather than the fantasy you see on telly.

[Jan]

   Me thinks he doth protest too much

now what is that a sign of?

[scipio_usmc]

So when did you start deteriorating ?

I haven't which is why I can run circles around you all day long.

[Jan]

I haven't which is why I can run circles around you all day long.

you can run round in circles until you disappear up your own backside for all I care - your posts just convince me more and more he is innocent - strange that !

[grahameb]

I haven't which is why I can run circles around you all day long.

Unfortunately it is you who are running in circles by chasing your own tail.
wake up Dinozzo!.

[lookout]

  Me thinks he doth protest too much

now what is that a sign of?

Uncertainty. Trying to convince yourself.

[Jan]

Now as I have not finished reading I can not comment on this - but this is on the link



": The Innocent Man..for anyone who may be interested in this fascinating case I am up to chapter twelve of the transcript by David Shaw (pseudo). There is not a doubt in my mind that Jeremy Bamber is guilty of these five murders but I do believe he had an accomplice...he can never betray 'the third party' without also betraying himself..The irony , had Bamber pleaded guilty he would now be a free man.



Now Scipio does that sound like Mike? Perhaps you would like to retract your implied accusations?

[grahameb]

Now as I have not finished reading I can not comment on this - but this is on the link



": The Innocent Man..for anyone who may be interested in this fascinating case I am up to chapter twelve of the transcript by David Shaw (pseudo). There is not a doubt in my mind that Jeremy Bamber is guilty of these five murders but I do believe he had an accomplice...he can never betray 'the third party' without also betraying himself..The irony , had Bamber pleaded guilty he would now be a free man.



Now Scipio does that sound like Mike? Perhaps you would like to retract your implied accusations?

Of course it isn't Mike. It is scipio's way of rubbishing everything he doesn't like. He's always doing it.

[nugnug]

Now as I have not finished reading I can not comment on this - but this is on the link



": The Innocent Man..for anyone who may be interested in this fascinating case I am up to chapter twelve of the transcript by David Shaw (pseudo). There is not a doubt in my mind that Jeremy Bamber is guilty of these five murders but I do believe he had an accomplice...he can never betray 'the third party' without also betraying himself..The irony , had Bamber pleaded guilty he would now be a free man.



Now Scipio does that sound like Mike? Perhaps you would like to retract your implied accusations?

mike would never say that.

[Jan]

mike would never say that.

I will let you know when I finish reading if that is the conclusion or not.

[grahameb]

I will let you know when I finish reading if that is the conclusion or not.

Of course its not Mike Jan. It's only their way of trying to discredit everything.

[No-Bits]

Of course its not Mike Jan. It's only their way of trying to discredit everything.

Huh, would it be that bad if it was Mike who wrote it? It appears you are claiming that the tales of Mike are not credible. 

[grahameb]

Huh, would it be that bad if it was Mike who wrote it? It appears you are claiming that the tales of Mike are not credible. 

I don't suppose it would? But then again it would be another "lie" to level at him wouldn't it?