silencer evidence

[sami]

Sami has also said in the past the silencer is fabricated.

nice to know your tracking my posts david,its not a crime to change ones mind is it,iam still not sure about it,now david you and your gang have blamed sheila,ep,the family,the forensic experts,the judge,that now only leaves the jury wasnt it written that 1 member had persuded others to change stance,who was that jury member,could he have been planted there by ep,or the family,just another theory david for you to add to the mixing pot

[lookout]

Why don't you ask your friend Jackie - there was an imposter posting as her for weeks and you didn't even realise! 

It takes one to know one does it not ?

[Jane]

It takes one to know one does it not ?

According to you, Lookout, no one pulls wool over your eyes.

[Caroline]

It takes one to know one does it not ?

Takes one to know one? That's a ridiculous comment given that I use my real name - it comes down to 'perceptiveness'. So no it does not 'take one to know one, nah, nah, nah, nah nah! 

[lookout]

According to you, Lookout, no one pulls wool over your eyes.

How do you know that I took any notice of the posts ?

[Caroline]

How do you know that I took any notice of the posts ?

Because you replied to them and complimented her.

[lookout]

How do you know that I took any notice of the posts ?

What I saw at the time was a load of giddy drivel which I totally ignored. So now,what's the betting that you're going to say that it was her ? I'm not stupid in any way  !!

[gringo]

I agree with you gringo, but that's just members here - it's a big world out there.

  It is rare to get most members of this forum to agree on anything which in itself is some achievement.
   Anyway, have you not read Adam's recent threads or are you trying to pretend they don't exist?

[Caroline]

  It is rare to get most members of this forum to agree on anything which in itself is some achievement.
   Anyway, have you not read Adam's recent threads or are you trying to pretend they don't exist?

What do you think? 

[lookout]

Because you replied to them and complimented her.

How did you know it was a fake ??

[Adam]

  It is rare to get most members of this forum to agree on anything which in itself is some achievement.
   Anyway, have you not read Adam's recent threads or are you trying to pretend they don't exist?

I'm still waiting for you to say who and how the silencer was fabricated. Or how Sheila committed the massacre.

Then again. You can't.

[lookout]

You've been told time out of number how and why Sheila committed the murders so why do you keep asking ? The ONLY conclusion that I can come to is that the only posts you read are your OWN !! It's been " explained " in various versions as that's all we can do is to surmise how she'd done it because none of us were there  It's a debate and there are no hard and fast RULES that what any of us say,has to be taken as fact !

[Jane]

You've been told time out of number how and why Sheila committed the murders so why do you keep asking ? The ONLY conclusion that I can come to is that the only posts you read are your OWN !! It's been " explained " in various versions as that's all we can do is to surmise how she'd done it because none of us were there  It's a debate and there are no hard and fast RULES that what any of us say,has to be taken as fact !

However, just saying "Sheila did it" isn't enough. Nor is saying why you think she did. There HAS to be a cohesive explanation. If the various parts don't fit, it won't make a whole.

[lookout]

However, just saying "Sheila did it" isn't enough. Nor is saying why you think she did. There HAS to be a cohesive explanation. If the various parts don't fit, it won't make a whole.

Your only reason for Sheila not having done it is that Jeremy dd  So what are your reasons for not blaming Sheila ? It's not enough to say it could have been either one of them when one is unable to speak for herself but at the same time when there is no evidence against Jeremy,shouldn't you start looking at the history/background of the accused ? Which is what I did when I learnt of Sheila's traumatic life,beginning with losing babies !!

[lookout]

However, just saying "Sheila did it" isn't enough. Nor is saying why you think she did. There HAS to be a cohesive explanation. If the various parts don't fit, it won't make a whole.

You know as well as I do that the pointers were in place as regards Sheila.