silencer evidence

[Adam]

If the police wanted to fabricate the silencer, they just needed to do another official search and pretend to find it. They didn't do another search and were given the silencer by the relatives.

If the relatives gave the police a silencer with blood, hair and paint on, it is certain it was used for the massacre. So the police did not need to fabricate anything. They even lost the hair, which was almost certainly Neville's.  Which shows how uncommitted they were to frame Bamber.

Surely people are not suggesting the relatives gave the police the silencer with nothing on, then suggested the police fabricate evidence. The police being happy to oblige.

[Adam]

It was impossible for the police to fabricate the silencer evidence. For the same reasons it was impossible for the relatives to.

It is simply solid evidence which matches the other forensic evidence showing Sheila did not commit the massacre.

[sami]

It was impossible for the police to fabricate the silencer evidence. For the same reasons it was impossible for the relatives to.

It is simply solid evidence which matches the other forensic evidence showing Sheila did not commit the massacre.

glad you joined the conversation adam,having put some excellent posts on the silencer evidence

[gringo]

Have you not read my recent threads. Or trying to pretend it does not exist ?

The silencer shows 100% that Bamber is guilty.

It was impossible for the relatives or police to frame Bamber with the silencer. 

It is an outrageous and sick suggestion that law abiding citizens or the police would even think about doing  this. The relatives themselves said there was enough evidence without the silencer. They were right. 

There are hundreds of pieces of forensic evidence showing Sheila is not the killer. Meaning it was Bamber, who had several motives, an opportunity, no alibi and made a ludicros claim that Neville phoned him, rounding the alive suspects down to one.  There is also a mountain of circumstantial evidence and several pre massacre witnesses. So no reason to fabricate the silencer.

Supporters and people who believe in lurid conspiricy theories optimistically claim that the silencer was fabficated as it shows 100% Bamber is guilty.  But have no evidence. A former supporter claims Stan Jones fabricated the silencer, but again has no proof.

You know all this.

   No I haven't read your threads because they are repetitive and you are unable to distinguish between facts and half baked opinions.
     It appears that I am not alone in this view if the voting on the silencer evidence is anything to go by. Thus far only 1 of 9 voters is of the opinion that the silencer evidence isn't fabricated, a staggering 11%.                So it appears that the rest of the forum either haven't read your recent threads or are, like me, just pretending that they don't exist.

[sami]

   No I haven't read your threads because they are repetitive and you are unable to distinguish between facts and half baked opinions.
     It appears that I am not alone in this view if the voting on the silencer evidence is anything to go by. Thus far only 1 of 9 voters is of the opinion that the silencer evidence isn't fabricated, a staggering 11%.                So it appears that the rest of the forum either haven't read your recent threads or are, like me, just pretending that they don't exist.

are the remaining 8 jb supporters ,what will the poll prove,

[gringo]

are the remaining 8 jb supporters ,what will the poll prove,

   Sami, even guilters disbelieve the silencer evidence.

[sami]

   Sami, even guilters disbelieve the silencer evidence.

gringo people will always be split on it like other matters relating to the case.the only thing both sides agree on ,is that 5 dead bodies were found at whf

[gringo]

gringo people will always be split on it like other matters relating to the case.the only thing both sides agree on ,is that 5 dead bodies were found at whf

  There is no split, Sami. On this issue there is almost overwhelming consensus that the silencer evidence is fabricated. I think it's just you and Adam
   

[sami]

  There is no split, Sami. On this issue there is almost overwhelming consensus that the silencer evidence is fabricated. I think it's just you and Adam
   

i think youre wrong.never mind us the people that mattered 'the jury' 10 of them believed it was used,so its not just me and adam,iam glad you and your pals werent on that jury

[David1819]

  There is no split, Sami. On this issue there is almost overwhelming consensus that the silencer evidence is fabricated. I think it's just you and Adam
   

Sami has also said in the past the silencer is fabricated.

[Caroline]

Its from the horses mouth Caroline. why would a Superintendent ask after something that does not exist?

We have had the discussion before and yo have posted something that was said in isolation - you have no idea why that question was being asked, you have just assumed.

[Caroline]

Ask Caroline.

Why don't you ask your friend Jackie - there was an imposter posting as her for weeks and you didn't even realise! 

[Caroline]

  There is no split, Sami. On this issue there is almost overwhelming consensus that the silencer evidence is fabricated. I think it's just you and Adam
   

I agree with you gringo, but that's just members here - it's a big world out there.

[David1819]

We have had the discussion before and yo have posted something that was said in isolation - you have no idea why that question was being asked, you have just assumed.

Except I do have an idea why, it is you that has assumed I don't. I might start calling you the assumptionator 

It is part of a whole interview transcript about the allegations of corruptions. While going through the lab at different times the silencer for some unexplained reason had two different serial numbers 22 and 23 then back to 22 again. 

[Adam]

   No I haven't read your threads because they are repetitive and you are unable to distinguish between facts and half baked opinions.
     It appears that I am not alone in this view if the voting on the silencer evidence is anything to go by. Thus far only 1 of 9 voters is of the opinion that the silencer evidence isn't fabricated, a staggering 11%.                So it appears that the rest of the forum either haven't read your recent threads or are, like me, just pretending that they don't exist.

I suspect you did read the threads. And have created this poll as a weak reaction. Knowing supporters and former supporters will claim the silencer evidence was fabricated. As the evidence on it shows Bamber is 100% guilty.

I did my investigation on the silencer as supporters like to act as if it's the only piece of forensic evidence which shows Sheila did not commit the massacre. When there are over a hundred pieces. As it happens the silencer alone shows Bamber guilty.

It is preposturous to suggest the relatives or police would even think about fabricating evidence on such a grand scale But if they did, kindly tell me how they went about it, considering it was impossible to do. And while you're at it, you can tell me how Sheila committed the massacre. Including 1/2 phone calls and a kitchen fight. You were very quiet when I asked this question. Other supporters/former supporters at least refused point blank to answer.