Author Topic: teddybear  (Read 18146 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: teddybear
« Reply #105 on: June 11, 2016, 07:14:PM »




NONE of us has an answer as to how the bullet case ended up where it did-----------but there IS a logical answer to how blood flowed upward.

what about the bullet case?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: teddybear
« Reply #106 on: June 11, 2016, 07:18:PM »
There is a small stream from that photo. The fluid MAY BE forced out the mouth and nose by abdominal pressure from changes in the body

OR her head was tilted back!!

Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: teddybear
« Reply #107 on: June 11, 2016, 07:27:PM »
OR her head was tilted back!!

No because that will disturb the other streams of blood. all the streams of blood follow in one direction according to the path of least resistence. and by the time the fluids start coming up Jeremy would be outside anyway


Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21133
Re: teddybear
« Reply #108 on: June 11, 2016, 07:35:PM »
Could someone explain what all this is trying to prove?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: teddybear
« Reply #109 on: June 11, 2016, 07:58:PM »
No because that will disturb the other streams of blood. all the streams of blood follow in one direction according to the path of least resistence. and by the time the fluids start coming up Jeremy would be outside anyway

Yes.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: teddybear
« Reply #110 on: June 11, 2016, 08:01:PM »
Her neck was extended back to have aimed the shot from that position.Remember the bullet went upwards. So with her neck bent back,the blood would have run that way too.
i disagree.if you look at the photo.she could not have bent her neck that far back because the bedside cabinet will not allow her neck back that far.so with her head slightly leaning against the cabinet the shot would not have gone to the brain

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: teddybear
« Reply #111 on: June 11, 2016, 08:04:PM »
Could someone explain what all this is trying to prove?
hi steve,its about her being carried and the path of the fatal shot,angles

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: teddybear
« Reply #112 on: June 11, 2016, 08:58:PM »
Could someone explain what all this is trying to prove?

They are tying to suggest Sheila could not have killed herself because of the trickle of blood running from her nose to her left eye  ::)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: teddybear
« Reply #113 on: June 11, 2016, 09:30:PM »
They are tying to suggest Sheila could not have killed herself because of the trickle of blood running from her nose to her left eye  ::)

Not quite as bad as saying Jeremy must be innocent because there is a hand print on the bible  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: teddybear
« Reply #114 on: June 11, 2016, 10:26:PM »
Not quite as bad as saying Jeremy must be innocent because there is a hand print on the bible  ::)

Ah But who's hand print is it and what is the print made of? that's the crucial point  ;)

« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 10:27:PM by David1819 »

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: teddybear
« Reply #115 on: June 11, 2016, 10:32:PM »
Ah But who's hand print is it and what is the print made of? that's the crucial point  ;)
could it be jb's right hand with a glove on :)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: teddybear
« Reply #116 on: June 11, 2016, 10:48:PM »
Ah But who's hand print is it and what is the print made of? that's the crucial point  ;)

It makes no odds - it proves nothing other than there is hand print on the bible. Nothing crucial about any of it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: teddybear
« Reply #117 on: June 11, 2016, 10:59:PM »
It makes no odds - it proves nothing other than there is hand print on the bible. Nothing crucial about any of it.

This is coming from someone making a big deal of a drop of blood running out Sheila's nose  ;D ;D

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21133
Re: teddybear
« Reply #118 on: June 11, 2016, 11:01:PM »
Strange the Defence didn't make more of the bible or Sheila's illness at trial..

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: teddybear
« Reply #119 on: June 11, 2016, 11:04:PM »
This is coming from someone making a big deal of a drop of blood running out Sheila's nose  ;D ;D
what is crucial about that print,david