Why the police did not attempt to get a covert audio confession from Bamber:

[sami]

There are no blindfolds on me !

i didnt say you

[lookout]

i didnt say you

Well that makes a change.

[Caroline]

There are no blindfolds on me !

No, or you wouldn't be able to see out of those rose tinted glasses (JUST JOKING!!) 

[David1819]

That's not a fact David.

It's a theory backed up by information which you have interpreted in a particular way.

It's like saying that Jupiter is a planet, cows are animals, therefore grass must be green. There is no correlation between your information and your conclusion. You may be correct, in the same way that grass is indeed green, but you may equally be wrong.

By definition, that is not a fact, however much you want it to be.

The above is a fact by the way. 

Il repeat it as many times as necessary until it sinks in. Seems to be a difficult pill for you to swallow 

JMs testimony contains in part the exact same false information that the police gave AE and RB. Read it for yourself.

[guest2181]

Il repeat it as many times as necessary until it sinks in.

You can say the capital City of Italy is Tokyo, a thousand times, it doesn't make it a fact.

Your opinion is not fact, you can't go to court and prove something to be a fact by saying that's how you interpret things.

If you can't understand that then there's no hope for you.

[sami]

quote author=Hartley. link=topic=7676.msg362823#msg362823 date=1464278462]
You can say the capital City of Italy is Tokyo, a thousand times, it doesn't make it a fact.

Your opinion is not fact, you can't go to court and prove something to be a fact by saying that's how you interpret things.

If you can't understand that then there's no hope for you.
[/quote]

[Caroline]

You can say the capital City of Italy is Tokyo, a thousand times, it doesn't make it a fact.

Your opinion is not fact, you can't go to court and prove something to be a fact by saying that's how you interpret things.

If you can't understand that then there's no hope for you.

What David hasn't considered is that rather than Ann feeding Julie info, Ann may have learned some things from Julie. The bible on the chest for instance - Ann considered that it may have come from Julie.

[guest2181]

What David hasn't considered is that rather than Ann feeding Julie info, Ann may have learned some things from Julie. The bible on the chest for instance - Ann considered that it may have come from Julie.

There were things reported in the news by the time Julie came forward also.

I'm certainly not asserting that Julie told the truth, I have no idea, but David likewise has no idea of her truthfulness. He can guess, he can come up with theories and opinions, but that's all they are.

[guest154]

There were things reported in the news by the time Julie came forward also.

I'm certainly not asserting that Julie told the truth, I have no idea, but David likewise has no idea of her truthfulness. He can guess, he can come up with theories and opinions, but that's all they are.

I think there is a lot in this case that could be A, B or C....and there it no way to actually tell. This being one of them.