are the appeal court and the ccrc guilty of double standards

[David1819]

yes but the paths the bullets took show clearly that the rifle was NOT between her legs but was at an angle and to the right of her body no shots were straight through the neck from in front of her

who told you that?

[Caroline]

theres no way sc fired those 2 shots she would have had to hold the rifle at an impossible angle

Of course she didn't/

[Caroline]

It's police language-----" appeared to be ". Like someone who's rat-arsed " appeared to be drunk ".
You've got a lot to learn. A cop will never commit himself-----------ask yourself why.

Because years later people like you will try and distort what they said.

[David1819]

Of course she didn't/

Prove it.

[Caroline]

Prove it.

Prove she did!

[nugnug]

Of course she didn't/

if the patholgists dont feel thre qaulfied to say that for a fact imcertan your not.

[David1819]

Prove she did!

The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim

[Caroline]

The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim

So you can't? Of course I knew that. Jeremy is claiming  to be innocent and as it is he not me who's claims are in question, the burden of proof is all his. This is a forum, not a court and not everything that is known can be discussed here.

[David1819]

So you can't? Of course I knew that. Jeremy is claiming  to be innocent and as it is he not me who's claims are in question, the burden of proof is all his. This is a forum, not a court and not everything that is known can be discussed here.

I am not asking Jeremy to prove his innocence, I am asking you to prove what you claim to be true

[lookout]

Because years later people like you will try and distort what they said.

Not at all. When someone " appears " to be drunk,it doesn't necessarily mean that they are,and this misinterpretation can be taken whichever way is the chosen version of events.
Appear is a non-commital description which is used by the police rather than " was or wasn't ".
How many people have been accused of being drunk when it's been a medical problem ? 

[lookout]

Of course she didn't/

Rubbish. Not so long ago in America,a child of 3 shot his mother ( dead ) after he'd found her gun at the backseat of the car they were travelling in.

[sami]

Prove it.

where is the gunshot residue on sheilas nightie where is the gun oil from handling bullets on sheilas hands when the lab people loaded that rifle as a test their hands were covered in gun oil.take a look at the photo lemonhead kindly gave to me and see the path the bullet took.also where is the blood on sc nighty or do you think firing 25 shots some at point blank range there would be no back splatter what about the life and death struggle in the kitchen with a bleeding nb would sc not have even a few spots of smudges of blood on the front of her nighty.now prove jb didnt do it

[sami]

who told you that?

the picture lemonhead sent me told me that or even showed me that

[sami]

Prove it.

its between the 2 of them i dont have to prove jb did it only that sc did not do it .jb was cunning enough to make sure no forenics  were found on him to prove he did it .but was not smart enough to realise people could in the future show sc couldnt have done.that only leaves him.childkillers dont get much symthapy from the courts

[lookout]

So JB purposely put himself in the frame with everything he's alleged to have done,or not done ?
 This is how it reads from a guilty point of view. His actions,behaviour,dress,spending,holidays,etc etc.
Just as if !