are the appeal court and the ccrc guilty of double standards

[Neil]

adam cut it out

What did he cut out?

[sami]

You have to accept the forensic evidence Lookout. I kept supplying it to you and then you kept asking the same question. So the library was created.

You are perfrctly entitled to post on any of the threads in the library.

i personally think the library is excellent any ones not sure of something then it  can be found and verified in one place.must be good for the forum doubters and believers

[sami]

What did he cut out?

i meant stop upsetting lookout

[Jane]

I have reported this to the moderators.

Careful Adam. If you start reporting such innocuous posts the men in white coats will be taking you away for a "rest".

[David1819]

Similar to you're forensic evidence breakthrough. Which you refuse to elaboarate on as 'it will give the crown more time to prepare'.

And similar to you're 'detailed' 2016 breakdown of how Sheila committed the massacre. Which you bottled out of posting. Despite repeated requests.

Actually they are not similar.  My Forensic evidence library has 27 thread links to the forensic evidence which convicted Bamber.

It was created for Lookout as she kept asking the same question. Which is understandable with Lookout.  You, Lookout and Nugs now refuse to accept the evidence. What a team

Adam iv looked through your library. what isle is the actual alleged forensic evidence kept? they all seem empty! did I miss an isle?
 

[Adam]

i meant stop upsetting lookout

I'm not even posting to her.

Supporters have a problem with the Forensic Evidence Library. Before they could pretend the silencer was only forensic evidence. No would have the time to disagree and post all the other forensic evidence. Although muggins Adam did a couple of times.

With a lot of the forensic evidence now in the library, it is easy to answer when someone says 'what other evidence is there'. As Nugs asked on page one.

[sami]

I'm not even posting to her.

Supporters have a problem with the Forensic Evidence Library. Before they could pretend the silencer was only forensic evidence. No would have the time to disagree and post all the other forensic evidence. Although muggins Adam did a couple of times.

With a lot of the forensic evidence now in the library, it is easy to answer when someone says 'what other evidence is there'. As Nugs asked on page one.

good point adam its what i said a few posts earlier

[lookout]

I'm not even posting to her.

Supporters have a problem with the Forensic Evidence Library. Before they could pretend the silencer was only forensic evidence. No would have the time to disagree and post all the other forensic evidence. Although muggins Adam did a couple of times.

With a lot of the forensic evidence now in the library, it is easy to answer when someone says 'what other evidence is there'. As Nugs asked on page one.

You're posting ABOUT me which is worse !! I'd rather be confronted than someone go behind my back as I'm not a coward like you are !

[nugnug]

I'm not even posting to her.

Supporters have a problem with the Forensic Evidence Library. Before they could pretend the silencer was only forensic evidence. No would have the time to disagree and post all the other forensic evidence. Although muggins Adam did a couple of times.

With a lot of the forensic evidence now in the library, it is easy to answer when someone says 'what other evidence is there'. As Nugs asked on page one.

i think one of the problems being it doesnt exist.

[susan]

i think one of the problems being it doesnt exist.

Hi Nugs  I agree with you on this point.

[susan]

Adam iv looked through your library. what isle is the actual alleged forensic evidence kept? they all seem empty! did I miss an isle?
 

DavidI just love your empty library and I think this post should be awarded Post of the Year 

[Caroline]

soin jenkins forenic evdence qustioned gets retrial.

barry geordge forensic brought into qustion gets retrial.

jeremy bammber forensic evedence brought in to qustion conviction upheld.

So anyone who questions forensic evidence should get a retrial?

[nugnug]

well when advances in technology bring that evdence into qustion yes.

and thats what normaly happens.

[Adam]

The silencer is the most famous piece of forensic evidence. It's stood the test of time quite easily. I mean there was human blood in it,  almost certainly Sheila's.

Supporters like to bring up the silencer and try to discredit it. Claiming it's the only piece of forensic evidence. This was tried again today.

This approach sometimes worked although there are over a hundred pieces of incriminating forensic evidence. Other posters didn't have time to post all the other forensic evidence. 

When supporters asked what the other forensic evidence was, muggins here would spend time posting it. Only to be asked the exact same question a few days later.

Now I can just direct supporters to the 'Forensic Evidence Library'.

[nugnug]

dna suggests that its not sheilas.