are the appeal court and the ccrc guilty of double standards

[Adam]

He's not listening.

[David1819]

There is a forensic evidence library.

Ah yes, How can we forget Adams compelling forensic evidence library?

behold!

[lookout]

As I'd said------------full of emptiness.

[Jane]

As I'd said------------full of emptiness.

A void. Best avoided.

[sami]

jb did such a good job that morning that it cant be proved one way or the other if he did it or not.so it was left to 12 men n women to decide his fate and they did.that what happens when one tries to be too clever

[lookout]

But it wasn't the unanimous decision that one would have expected for such a crime was it ?

[sami]

But it wasn't the unanimous decision that one would have expected for such a crime was it ?

yes thats true they were just members of the public and just like us on here their opinions were divided.but good point

[Jane]

But it wasn't the unanimous decision that one would have expected for such a crime was it ?

As I've frequently said. Opinions, unlike happenings, aren't played out in black or white. It's all grey area.

[Caroline]

the retesting has already caled the silencer evdence into qustion 2 medical experts have called into qustion the dna calls it into qustion.

the fact that its thought thats its thought to be junes blood not sheilas calls it into qustion.

It has never been proven to be Junes blood - it was June's DNA which could have gotten there by contamination. Personally, I don't believe the silencer was used but it can be no more 'proven' than Nevill's phone call. For every expert that's states one thing, there will always be another to say the opposite. Also, even it it was June's blood, how does that mean Sheila is the killer? What forensic evidence makes Sheila responsible or do forensics only matter when we're discussing Jeremy?

[nugnug]

because the jury were because had the jury known it at the time it could have led them to a diffrent conclusion.

had the defence known that at the time they could have mounted a better argument.

had the proscution known this at the time they might not have admited it as evdence.

[sami]

because the jury were because had the jury known it at the time it could have led them to a diffrent conclusion.

had the defence known that at the time they could have mounted a better argument.

had the proscution known this at the time they might not have admited it as evdence.

hindsight is allways a good thing

[nugnug]

the case of sion jenkins there were were forensic experts who said the evdece agianst him sound but he still got his retrial.

[Adam]

Ah yes, How can we forget Adams compelling forensic evidence library?

behold!

Similar to you're forensic evidence breakthrough. Which you refuse to elaboarate on as 'it will give the crown more time to prepare'.

And similar to you're 'detailed' 2016 breakdown of how Sheila committed the massacre. Which you bottled out of posting. Despite repeated requests.

Actually they are not similar.  My Forensic evidence library has 27 thread links to the forensic evidence which convicted Bamber.

It was created for Lookout as she kept asking the same question. Which is understandable with Lookout.  You, Lookout and Nugs now refuse to accept the evidence. What a team.

[sami]

the case of sion jenkins there were were forensic experts who said the evdece agianst him sound but he still got his retrial.

good point i have allways felt that bas---d got away with murder

[Adam]

jb did such a good job that morning that it cant be proved one way or the other if he did it or not.so it was left to 12 men n women to decide his fate and they did.that what happens when one tries to be too clever

You know Bamber is 100% guilty. Every bit of forensic and circumstantial evidence shows it. He had a motive, opportunity and no alibi.

You are just encouraging Mike, Lookout and Nugs to keep posting crazy theories. The latest today from Nugs, after Mike claimed this week that a man called Ralph Nevill helped Sheila commit the massacre.