are the appeal court and the ccrc guilty of double standards

[nugnug]

soin jenkins forenic evdence qustioned gets retrial.

barry geordge forensic brought into qustion gets retrial.

jeremy bammber forensic evedence brought in to qustion conviction upheld.

[lookout]

 I don't know about being guilty of double standards,what they really are,are guilty of being useless.

[Adam]

There was only piece of forensic evidence in the Barry George case I believe. A spec of gun powder in his pocket.

There was only piece of forensic evidence in the Sion Jenkins case. The jury unable to make a decision.

Both crimes could have been committed by anyone.


On the Bamber case there are over a hundred pieces of incriminating forensic evidence. Together with only one alive suspect.

[nugnug]

in all cases there was 1 piece of forensic that was brought into qustion the forensic evdence agianst bamber is the silencer.

[Adam]

in all cases there was 1 piece of forensic that was brought into qustion the forensic evdence agianst bamber is the silencer.

There is a forensic evidence library.

[nugnug]

so apart from the silencer what forensic evidence was there.

[Adam]

so apart from the silencer what forensic evidence was there.

There is a forensic evidence library thread.

[lookout]

For reasons unknown,there still remains to be catalogues of errors due to lack of communication as well as conflicting information ( right hand never knowing what the left hand's doing ) Both are only as good as the ( correct ) information given to them.
 Bottom line being good/honest police work,which in a lot of cases has been abysmal,not to mention insidious too,either through lack of training or deliberately to further their prospects !!
The CCRC were appointed as a supposed independent organisation in which to investigate MOJ's---------but unfortunately haven't lived up to their ability in doing so on a number of occasions. They are there,or should be,if a case has been refused by the court of appeal.

[lookout]

There is a forensic evidence library thread.

Of what ?

[nugnug]

There is a forensic evidence library.

so in other words you dont know.

[Adam]

There is a forensic evidence library. Which holds links to 27 threads on the incriminating forensic evidence.

[lookout]

How tedious.

[nugnug]

i think adams conceding there is only 1 piece of forensic evedence like in the case of barry geordge and sion jenkins.

[Caroline]

so apart from the silencer what forensic evidence was there.

Given that Jeremy staged the scene and had everyone (well almost everyone) believe that Sheila was responsible, had time to destroy or wash his clothes etc. AND that his presence at WHF wasn't unusual - what forensic evidence would you imagine there to be? Also, what forensic evidence shows that Sheila was responsible?

Circumstantial evidence is used to convict lots of offenders or would you be happy for anyone to walk free when no forensic evidence links them to the case, even though such evidence may be compelling? 

[lookout]

Well he seems to be stuck on the fact that there's a " mountain " of evidence,though it's now whittled down to a " library ", but still nothing concrete or substantial forthcoming. He's taken the same route as EP did which is to delve into something that isn't there and by using words to describe such a " find ",thinks he's come up with something. Only convincing themselves.
 A load of hot air and statements full of emptiness.