Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 348305 times)

0 Members and 66 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2355 on: June 05, 2016, 02:15:PM »
I can only think of Basil Cock complaining about the fingerprint dust.
I wonder if he did a Larry Grayson. ( the dust round here )

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20872
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2356 on: June 05, 2016, 02:50:PM »
I can only think of Basil Cock complaining about the fingerprint dust.
I wonder if he did a Larry Grayson. ( the dust round here )
I always think of him when the phrase "you're not alone" is mentioned..

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2357 on: June 05, 2016, 03:09:PM »
There's still something nagging me about this fingerprint dust, a remark Jeremy made to Julie upon returning to the White House with Ann Eaton present about the Police not being thorough, if anyone recalls the chronology?

The 'white dust' on everything, must have been a reference to the 'fingerprint dust', made by 'Basil John Cock'. Let's get the 'facts' right, cops didn't bother fingerinting the farmhouse, until after the ' first week in September, 1985'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2358 on: June 05, 2016, 03:10:PM »
The 'white dust' on everything, must have been a reference to the 'fingerprint dust', made by 'Basil John Cock'. Let's get the 'facts' right, cops didn't bother fingerinting the farmhouse, until after the ' first week in September, 1985'...

'Are you with me, are you with me'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2359 on: June 05, 2016, 03:13:PM »
Why would the ' executor of the parents estates', be fumbling around at the scene in August 1985, before the  opening of the inquest, on the 14th August, 1985?
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 03:15:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2360 on: June 05, 2016, 03:16:PM »
Why would the ' executor of the parents estates', be fumbling around at the scene in August 1985, before the  opening of the inquest, on the 14th August, 1985?

Use your common sense...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2361 on: June 05, 2016, 03:18:PM »
Use your common sense...

The prosecutions case, was a 'shambolic' one...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2362 on: June 05, 2016, 03:30:PM »
I always think of him when the phrase "you're not alone" is mentioned..





I loved him Steve.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2363 on: June 05, 2016, 03:39:PM »
The prosecutions case, was a 'shambolic' one...




It was that alright Mike. They made it up as they went along. They had to do really because there was nothing to pin the crime on Jeremy except for the ones who'd hated Jeremy's guts and just wanted him out of their way so decided to sling as much mud as was humanely possible and call it " circumstantial " evidence.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2364 on: June 05, 2016, 03:43:PM »



It was that alright Mike. They made it up as they went along. They had to do really because there was nothing to pin the crime on Jeremy except for the ones who'd hated Jeremy's guts and just wanted him out of their way so decided to sling as much mud as was humanely possible and call it " circumstantial " evidence.

Yes, Lookout, you have hit the ' nail on its head'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2365 on: June 05, 2016, 03:50:PM »



It was that alright Mike. They made it up as they went along. They had to do really because there was nothing to pin the crime on Jeremy except for the ones who'd hated Jeremy's guts and just wanted him out of their way so decided to sling as much mud as was humanely possible and call it " circumstantial " evidence.


Good gracious!!!! So there's these -TOP- professionals with a huge reputation who go into a big murder case blindly and allow "the ones who hated Jeremy's guts and wanted him out of the way" to dictate conditions and did sod all squared about it. You're saying, by the sound of it, that they deliberately threw the case. Will you be saying next that the rellies paid them to do it?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2366 on: June 05, 2016, 03:59:PM »

Good gracious!!!! So there's these -TOP- professionals with a huge reputation who go into a big murder case blindly and allow "the ones who hated Jeremy's guts and wanted him out of the way" to dictate conditions and did sod all squared about it. You're saying, by the sound of it, that they deliberately threw the case. Will you be saying next that the rellies paid them to do it?




Yes,I meant all that I said and as for your finale--------I'd say if the cap fits.

How strange that suggestion should come into your head.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 04:00:PM by lookout »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2367 on: June 05, 2016, 04:02:PM »



Yes,I meant all that I said and as for your finale--------I'd say if the cap fits.

How strange that suggestion should come into your head.

Nah. I'm just reading what's in yours, Lookout.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2368 on: June 05, 2016, 04:06:PM »
For the benefit of those who do not know the circumstances of my own history, I would just like to mention that, as a result of being dishonestly targeted by South Yorkshire police, by the South Yorkshire CPS, and Barnsley Magistrates court, between 1986 and 1992 (six years of abuse, and state controlled dishonesty), that 'if' everything I had been saying to 'the cops', and 'the CPS', and Barnsley magistrates Court, and at Sheffield Crown court (September, 1988) had been ' listened too', and 'acted upon' then the families of the 'Hillsboro' 96 would not have had to wait a 'staggering ' 27 years for the truth about 'Hillsboro' to not only be told, but to be accepted...

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, they 'sought to shut me up' about the tampering with witness statements by other bent coppers, and about the dishonest manipulation of the pocketbook issuing system, etc...

I stood against them all at Sheffield Crown court in September, 1988, With the help of my defence counsel, Shaun Spencer, Qc., insisting that ' cops had fabricated the contents of DS Highams witness statement. A witness stament that was made for DS Higham, by DC Richardson (evil lying scumbag), because he claimed that he was entitled to make another police officers witness statement on that other officers behalf, because DC Richardson claimed that he had made the same pocketbook entries as DS Higham, during the early hours of 26th January, 1987, along with DS Higham, before 'both' had gone off duty in the early hours of 26th January, 1987...

But...

This could not possibly have been trtue, for many reasons, including 'the fact' that DC Richardson's pocket book notes could 'not' have been recorded  in his own pocketbook, relating to the alleged incident until after the 31st August, 1985, because the detail Richardson hopped to rely upon! Was not issued to DC Richardson, until ' that' (31st August, 1985) date...
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 04:10:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #2369 on: June 05, 2016, 04:07:PM »

Good gracious!!!! So there's these -TOP- professionals with a huge reputation who go into a big murder case blindly and allow "the ones who hated Jeremy's guts and wanted him out of the way" to dictate conditions and did sod all squared about it. You're saying, by the sound of it, that they deliberately threw the case. Will you be saying next that the rellies paid them to do it?

Irrelevant, use of excuses...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...