0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That little rug underneath her had been put there probably to stop any further transfer of blood from the bed where she lay because the blood on the opposite side to where June was didn't belong to Neville and it wasn't June's. Who's to argue if these things weren't recorded,then destroyed/missing later ?
Even more significant, an 'area / region, of expiated blood spotting' close to the right breast are of her nightdress, consistent with her having been gasping for breath, or blood that was spurting, after she had been shot...
The tights/leggings are still there, the spindles are blacked out near to the door because of something hanging over the bannister - the tights/leggings!
So, within the stroke of less than 24 hours, I have produced fresh arguments which are more than capable of being representative of 'evidence which shows Sheila's culpability', in the commissioning of these other four murders...
The pictures are from a different angle. they show nothing of the sort!
The triumph of reality over fantasy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you pretending to be blind?Everyone can see that there is a multiple spotting of 'expiated blood, right there on the nightdress, where I have circled 'it' in yellow. Are you suggesting that there is no blood there? Are you going to be suggesting that Jeremy was responsible for making this 'expiated blood' appear there? Worse still, did 'I draw the spots of expiated blood on the nightdress'?
Nothing is blacking out anything on the bannister, the 'wet looking light blue leggings' are clearly on the flat part of the bannister in one of the photographs, not the sloping part of the same bannister...
Well, of course, you're fully entitled to call it what you like. However, I'D have said that "expiated" blood would have covered a far greater area.
How much extra blood do you require me to insert onto the heavily bloodstained area so that you will accept that the other blood which is clearly visible on her nightdress is 'expiated blood'?
