0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.
There's another thing that I want to clear up, and that is, no matter what J is saying now, at the time the news was broken to him that all his family were dead at the scene, and later on, he believed in his own mind that cops had kept things back from him, and he genuinely believed in his own mind that cops had shot dead members of his family...
Evidence confirming this can be found in a statement given to COLP in 1991 by PS Saxby, and additionally, in the contents of the following witness statement extract made by 'Gerald Wiggins', dated, 8th October, 1985:-
So, that's two separate occasions that J has accused the police of shooting dead his family, once at the scene 7th August, 1985, when he told PS Saxby, and secondly,on the 30th August, 1985, when he told Gerald Wiggins...
When I first became aware of these 'facts' I remember thinking to myself, why was J being so confident that cops shot his family? Was someone, supposed to have survived to take the rap? Of course, I was guided toward thinking that way because when I started to take an interest in his case back in 1989, and after learning all the facts about his case from him, he had asked me what I thought? At that time I blurted out that his sister could have had an accomplice, and J responded by saying, 'You Clever Bastard'. He didn't realise that I was saying that to him with me having it my mind that 'he' could have been Sheila's accomplice, not anybody else. Later when I discovered how he had accused the armed cops who went into the farmhouse for shooting his family, and later still, when he had 'that' conversation with Gerald Wiggins, in which he once more expressed the view that cops might have done something they weren't telling him about, including the possibility that cops shot members of his family, or as it were, one particular member of the family, his sister...
Conversely, you COULD have asked yourself why it was that Jeremy wanted you to think he was so confident "that cops shot his family". I'm not surprised that he called you a "clever bastard" -always a point earner- when you'd given him an alternative scenario to play around with.
J couldn't control what I was thinking...Compared to me, he was 'pathetic'...He didn't like the independent way I went about doing things. My life did not and does not rely on what he thought, or thinks about me. My 'involvement' in the investigation of his case', was not about 'me', it was about 'him'...
I pursued the investigation into these deaths, as though J was his sisters accomplice. It was, I assumed, the correct approach given the circumstances. J was the accomplice of his sister, she was 'mean't to have survived', she was meant to have survived, so she could take the 'rap' for the murders...
What 'if', J had been S's accomplice, and although she was supposed to have 'survived' (to take the rap), cops effectively read into things wrongly, and ended up killing her?
Two bodies, downstairs, a male, female, a murder, a suicide, from 7.37am, and a further three bodies upstairs by 8.10am, all three were 'murders'...
They would find ' themselves on board' because J would be Sheila's accomplice...
