Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 348237 times)

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1455 on: May 23, 2016, 10:50:PM »
well done mike, did they also shoot sheila's accomplice the one that was at the window

No need for the sarcasm, I have found the 'needle in the haystack' that 'will' get these convictions quashed...
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 01:13:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1456 on: May 23, 2016, 10:52:PM »
I have 'pinpointed' the evidence, which finally confirms the beliefs I have harboured for over two decades, that 'Cops placed the anshuzt rifle onto Sheila's body in the main bedroom', not Jeremy Bamber...

At long last, after all this time, we can all rest assured that Jeremy had 'not' killed his sister, and 'stage managed' her body by planting the rifle in her possession to make cops think Sheila had taken her own life. The truth is, that 'Cops staged Sheila's death', to enable 'them' to present her death as a suicide, when in fact, it was 'not'...

I can now 'prove' categorically that PC 'David' Bird (SOCO), and DI 'Ron' Cook (SOCO) deceived the court which tried Bamber for these murders, in particular, the murder of his sister, and the lie relied upon that 'he' had 'placed the rifle onto Sheila's body', to give the impression that she had shot herself with use of 'that' rifle, when if the truth be known, he could not possibly have been involved in that process, at all...
youve still not told us if the police shot sheila's accomplice aswell

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1457 on: May 23, 2016, 10:59:PM »
All everybody has got to remember is that crime scene photograph No.23 was taken on the strip of negatives bearing the serial No.0012, and that crime scene photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, were taken using the negative strip bearing the serial No. 0034...

During the trial, Bird and Cook lied by informing the court that photograph 23 was taken 'after' photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32...

But...

on 31st January, 2001, PC Bird made a witness statement to COLP stating that he had stated that the photographs taken with use of negative strip 0034 had been taken 'before' photographs taken by negative strip 0012, which, 'he admitted' was 'incorrect'. He re-affirmed that photographs relating to negative strip 0012 had been taken before photographs taken with use of negative strip 0034...

Bingo!!!!!
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 01:15:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1458 on: May 23, 2016, 11:02:PM »
All everybody has got to remember is that crime scene photograph No.23 was taken on the strip of negatives bearing the serial No.0012, and that crime scene photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, were taken using the negative strip bearing the serial No. 0034...

During the trial, Bird and Cook lied by informing the court that photograph 23 was taken 'after' photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32...

But...

on 31st January, 2001, PC Bird made a witness statement to COLP stating that he had stated that the photographs taken with use of negative strip 0034 had been taken 'before' photographs taken by negative strip 0012, which, 'he admitted' was 'incorrect'. He re-affirmed that photographs relating to negative strip 0012 had been taken before photographs taken with use of negative strip 0034...

Bingo!!!!!
is it a full house mike :)

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1459 on: May 23, 2016, 11:03:PM »
All everybody has got to remember is that crime scene photograph No.23 was taken on the strip of negatives bearing the serial No.0012, and that crime scene photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, were taken using the negative strip bearing the serial No. 0034...

During the trial, Bird and Cook lied by informing the court that photograph 23 was taken 'after' photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32...

But...

on 31st January, 2001, PC Bird made a witness statement to COLP stating that he had stated that the photographs taken with use of negative strip 0034 had been taken 'before' photographs taken by negative strip 0012, which, 'he admitted' was 'incorrect'. He re-affirmed that photographs relating to negative strip 0012 had been taken before photographs taken with use of negative strip 0034...

Bingo!!!!!

Rifle at bedroom window (23) was therefore photographed at the bedroom window, before cops photographed 'it' on the body of Sheila Caffell - Jeremy Bamber could not possibly have been responsible for staging his sisters body with use of 'that' rifle, to supposedly be able to fool cops into thinking that his sister had taken her own life. He didn't do that which cops have accused him of doing, they did it themselves, shame on the lot of all those rotten bastards...
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 01:15:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1460 on: May 23, 2016, 11:06:PM »
is it a full house mike :)

Again, no need for the sarcasm, here look at this if you can read, and understand what you have read, or are reading...

PC Bird admits to COLP that the images taken in the negative strip 0034 was taken 'AFTER' the photographs taken in negative strip 0012...
« Last Edit: May 23, 2016, 11:08:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1461 on: May 23, 2016, 11:09:PM »
As I say, I am a self confessed 'genius'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1462 on: May 23, 2016, 11:11:PM »
As I say, I am a self confessed 'genius'...

I think, I shall get myself a stiff drink, and celebrate 'EUREKA, EUREKA, EUREKA'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1463 on: May 23, 2016, 11:14:PM »
Nobody moved anything, or touched anything, until 'after' PC Bird had finished taking all of his photographs...

What a load of 'Codswallop'...

'Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1464 on: May 23, 2016, 11:17:PM »
I think, I shall get myself a stiff drink, and celebrate 'EUREKA, EUREKA, EUREKA'...
are you sure you havent already been on the bottle

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1465 on: May 23, 2016, 11:20:PM »
Jeremy should be released immediately, give him 'home leave' so that he can return to live with dignity in the community. What we are dealing with here is corruption at its worst. But, hey listen up vile corrupt coppers, we are coming for you, we know what you did, how you did it, and how you have been hoping that nobody would ever be able to 'prove what you did' - but, you didn't bargain for somebody like me coming along, somebody who will never give up. Your all xxxx xxx xxxx xxxxxxxx they should bring back xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx like you lot...
« Last Edit: May 24, 2016, 09:41:AM by maggie »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1466 on: May 23, 2016, 11:20:PM »
are you sure you havent already been on the bottle

'Bushmills'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1467 on: May 23, 2016, 11:29:PM »
'Bamber is innocent', he 'didn't kill his sister', and 'he didn't stage her death scene', I have known the truth for a long time now, but today is the day, that I can say with a degree of certainty, that PC 'David' Bird, has dropped a 'clanger' by declaring to COLP investigators that the negative strip 0034 was filmed 'after negative strip 0012...

Cops are xxx xxx ..
« Last Edit: May 24, 2016, 09:42:AM by maggie »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1468 on: May 23, 2016, 11:32:PM »
'Bamber is innocent', he 'didn't kill his sister', and 'he didn't stage her death scene', I have known the truth for a long time now, but today is the day, that I can say with a degree of certainty, that PC 'David' Bird, has dropped a 'clanger' by declaring to COLP investigators that the negative strip 0034 was filmed 'after negative strip 0012...

Cops are fukked...

CCRC should be disbanded, they are not fit for purpose...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1469 on: May 24, 2016, 01:35:AM »
This is what PC 'David Bird (SOCO), told COLP investigators, in his witness statement to them on the 31st January, 2001:-

'The photographs produced from strips numbered, 0020, 0040, 0015, 0034, 0012, 0009, 0037, were placed by me in an order to represent that in which the photographs were originally taken. I now know that order to be incorrect. Upon reviewing the photographs from negatives 0034, I find that those photographs should be placed in the folder DB/100, after those numbered 0012...

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...