David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim

[Stephanie]

On the contrary, it's only just begun. A new chapter in the Bamber saga is on the Horizon you have my word on that John and I shall not disappoint

Can I ask you David, do you believe Bamber is innocent?

Do you know what a psychopath is and are you aware they thrive on any attention?

I've just clicked on your poster name and copied 3 of your first 4 posts from February 2015;

Why are you even allowed to post on this forum? You seem to have more fictional stories than Walt Disney!

Hello all

I'm very sceptical of the safety of Bambers conviction. I believe only he knows what happened that early morning.

Due to the serious nature of what he has been convicted of The crown will not risk releasing him.

The Home secretary and the Justice secretary have the power to release prisoners on whole life tariffs. This satisfied the EU courts.

I believe the Queen does also have the power to quash convictions but I doubt she will ever use it.

I think whole life tariffs are 100% justified. Do you really want the prospect of Ian Brady, The Bus-Stop Stalker,  The Crossbow Cannibal, The Gameshow Killer and Dennis Nilsen one day walking free just for Bambers sake?

Your first post was aimed at Mike T 

What has changed your mind about Bambers guilt from a year ago?

I'm obviously not asking you to reveal what it is that you've found, I'm just curious as to whether or not you have questioned where this could lead and the consequences of that..

I'm not questioning your word David but ensure you protect yourself and maybe discuss it with your Dad and NGB. The fallout from any publicity isn't nice, especially in relation to cases like this. My advice would be, as I've stated before; do not put your true identity into the public domain and certainly not before your findings have reached any positive conclusion.

[Adam]

There was more than enough circumstantial evidence to convict Jeremy but Julie's inside information was all that was needed to be sure of it.  She provided the motive when even the police were struggling to make sense of it all.  If the police wanted to frame Bamber they would have to have done so from the very beginning and with the assistance of several forensic science officers if Mike Tesko's wild allegations are to be believed.  That in itself is something I have great difficulty accepting.

There was no need to fabricate evidence in this case, noble cause or otherwise.   There isn't a single piece of evidence which points to Sheila's involvement other than as a victim otherwise I too would still be questioning it.

I have always said, Jeremy is very guilty or very unlucky!

The relatives said there was enough evidence without the silencer.

They were right. There is a forensic evidence library !

I'll create a circumstantial evidence library one day. But only if I can have  NGB say what a good boy I've been.

[Neil]

No well done David then for uncovering new evidence

What new evidence?

[JackiePreece]

What new evidence?

I would think xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx edited

There is so much going on at the moment which only a few people are aware of but I believe David is following Ngb's advice and keeping the fine details confidential

I am sure other people with new evidence would go straight to Ngb for help and advice

There is no better option
Safe hands

[David1819]

Can I ask you David, do you believe Bamber is innocent?

From what I have found, at the moment I am fairly confident the man is innocent 

However I am open to the possibility the crown may find a credible answer to it but until then we will have to wait and see.

What has changed your mind about Bambers guilt from a year ago?

I have kept going over the evidence and there is a lot of it. So overtime my conclusions have changed

I'm not questioning your word David but ensure you protect yourself and maybe discuss it with your Dad and NGB. The fallout from any publicity isn't nice, especially in relation to cases like this. My advice would be, as I've stated before; do not put your true identity into the public domain and certainly not before your findings have reached any positive conclusion.

Yeah I understand the issues that can arise, However if my findings get a positive conclusion people will be to busy focusing and speculating what will happen next and not really give me much thought anyway

[JackiePreece]

What Ive learned by NGB's posts are that he takes peoples comments/opinions/theories as he finds them. He remains opened minded, impartial and assists where he can.

There's a big difference re the above and the sweeping claims made by posters such as Jackiepreece that NGB believes Bamber to be innocent or indeed guilty.

Just to make this crystal clear incase this has not sunk in

There is no way in a million years Ngb would have helped or supported Jeremy over the years if he thought for a second Jeremy killed two young children and one day Jeremy will realise what Ngb has done for him

To think the conviction could be overturned because of genuine supporters and not involving the CT would make my so happy

[Stephanie]

From what I have found, at the moment I am fairly confident the man is innocent 

However I am open to the possibility the crown may find a credible answer to it but until then we will have to wait and see.

I have kept going over the evidence and there is a lot of it. So overtime my conclusions have changed

Yeah I understand the issues that can arise, However if my findings get a positive conclusion people will be to busy focusing and speculating what will happen next and not really give me much thought anyway

So you thought he was guilty and now believe him to be innocent, is that what you are saying?

How long have you been looking at the evidence? Since you joined the forum or long before?

I hope your beliefs are all you believe them to be.

[Stephanie]

There is no way in a million years Ngb would have helped or supported Jeremy over the years if he thought for a second Jeremy killed two young children and one day Jeremy will realise what Ngb has done for him

I have not seen anything definitive to suggest NGB believes Bamber to be innocent.

[Stephanie]

What new evidence?

I would think going by your previous posts you would be the last person to learn about new evidence

There is so much going on at the moment which only a few people are aware of but I believe David is following Ngb's advice and keeping the fine details confidential

I am sure other people with new evidence would go straight to Ngb for help and advice

There is no better option
Safe hands

Are you suggesting this because Neil has talked about smoking cannabis in his youth?

There isn't "so much going on at the moment" this is your over the top interpretation by the sounds of it.

David has found something that he believes could help Bamber; NGB has confirmed he has seen these findings and they have not been used before therefore the findings could be seen to be fresh evidence.

[Neil]

I would think going by your previous posts you would be the last person to learn about new evidence

There is so much going on at the moment which only a few people are aware of but I believe David is following Ngb's advice and keeping the fine details confidential

I am sure other people with new evidence would go straight to Ngb for help and advice

There is no better option
Safe hands

David is most likely a great bloke.  He may well have uncovered something interesting.

Jackie, you seem perfectly happy and content to believe that convincing new evidence exists, without even knowing what it is!

[Stephanie]

I want to make it clear I'm not knocking David's efforts. I know nothing about David or indeed what he has found. I think it's great David appears to have uncovered something new after 30 years but because of my belief that Bamber is a psychopath I have obvious fears.

[Stephanie]

David is most likely a great bloke.  He may well have uncovered something interesting.

Agreed Neil!

[Neil]

Hello David, may I ask, why have you at this stage, decided to publicly declare that you have potentially found new evidence? 

[JackiePreece]

I have not seen anything definitive to suggest NGB believes Bamber to be innocent.

Ask him simple, I know the answer

[Stephanie]

What past behaviour

Nothing could be worse that handing out fliers accusing innocent men of the murders your hubby committed

What vile despicable disgusting unforgiveable behaviour

Please explain how what I did then is any different to what you are doing now?

You are blaming a young mother, who suffered from mental health, of murdering her twin boys and parents and who doesn't have a voice of her own because her brother murdered her.