Author Topic: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony  (Read 9456 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #60 on: September 18, 2016, 11:02:AM »
It was two women.



You would know that--------how ? Hearsay ?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44304
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #61 on: September 18, 2016, 11:06:AM »


You would know that--------how ? Hearsay ?

Wilkes's book. Page 279.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #62 on: September 18, 2016, 11:25:AM »
Wilkes's book. Page 279.



--------------he said,smugly.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #63 on: September 18, 2016, 03:38:PM »
Lol. Yes the 2012 post shows a lot of current guilters used to  argue just as passionately for innocence. Caroline changing stance after Bamber didn't answer her question about the last trailer.

You are the only person I know who has gone from guilty to innocent, which seemed to happen after you made you're forensic evidence breakthrough. Although we have both said Scipio may have changed stance after watching Mike's latest video.

https://youtu.be/mmCART1vcCo


I can never tell if you are joking , was that sarcasm or did skippy change his mind?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #64 on: September 18, 2016, 04:06:PM »

I can never tell if you are joking , was that sarcasm or did skippy change his mind?

Did Skippy skip to the other side? Officially No

We had some rather lengthy and drawn out arguments on red about the silencer that he seemed to struggle grappling with the evidence I put forward.

We then exchanged various PMs about the more recent developments. He then suddenly stopped posting on the forum for a few month, I had emailed him to ask him why he was not posting anymore and if he started to change his mind, I got no answer. So I began to assume that could be the case, however he has recently come forward to deny this. No surprise.

However I believe he has become a closet doubter! in my opinion.



Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44304
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #65 on: September 18, 2016, 05:39:PM »

I can never tell if you are joking , was that sarcasm or did skippy change his mind?

Do you agree with Mike that the police shot Sheila ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #66 on: September 18, 2016, 06:27:PM »
Did Skippy skip to the other side? Officially No

We had some rather lengthy and drawn out arguments on red about the silencer that he seemed to struggle grappling with the evidence I put forward.

We then exchanged various PMs about the more recent developments. He then suddenly stopped posting on the forum for a few month, I had emailed him to ask him why he was not posting anymore and if he started to change his mind, I got no answer. So I began to assume that could be the case, however he has recently come forward to deny this. No surprise.


Thanks David .

I did not think it would be that easy.

However I believe he has become a closet doubter! in my opinion.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Why Rivlin QC rightly told the jury to dismiss Julie Mugfords testimony
« Reply #67 on: September 18, 2016, 07:57:PM »
Do you agree with Mike that the police shot Sheila ?

I am not sure I do because I think they would have done everything to keep the conclusion that Sheila was guilty , so to cover their backs I am sure they could have arranged a cover up story with evidence to shut the family and press up.


The only way I think that is true is if they were really cocky , they thought they had it covered but they did not count on the family forcing the issue by going further up the chain , and the new officers that took over the case were not aware what had happened.



Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Talk about " them and us ",which is in evidence,I've just read about a senior CPS lawyer who'd stabbed his wife in the head with a kitchen knife and beat her with an ornament was given a 6 year sentence for her attempted murder.
He'd pre-written a suicide note pertaining to " the day of death ",26th May.
The excuse for his attempted murder ? Desperation after a bout of work-related depression !
This mad looking individual will probably only serve 3 years if that.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
how did they all know he dident use his car or walk.

They didn't/don't. Personally, I think he did walk.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
They didn't/don't. Personally, I think he did walk.



Both ways ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Yep.



So what time after the " deed " would he have left WHF ? And in what direction/route ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076


So what time after the " deed " would he have left WHF ? And in what direction/route ?

20 minutes and 32 seconds and he headed towards ... His house!  ::) ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
If he were planning to murder his family why leave at all? He could have easily made an excuse to stay that night. That would have eliminated the risk of being seen on the journey and the possibility of being heard while entering the house. If he thought going home would afford some kind of alibi, he would surely have made sure he had witnesses to that effect.