Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test_2

[John]

Adam, could you change my quote in your post 329 as per my edit...bloody tablet is making up its own words now. 

[Adam]

There is a forensic evidence library.

This has 27 forensic evidence threads in. Each thread about a different piece of forensic evidence. However some of the threads discuss multiple pieces of forensic evidence.

There should really also be a circimstantial evidence library, which highlights Bamber's guilt.

[lookout]

Adam, could you change my quote in your post 329 as per my edit...bloody tablet is making up its own words now. 

Everything to match,eh John ? 

[lookout]

 COLP Statement/Interview of PS Woodcock.

Does this make sense to anyone ? :

Quote," I was struck with Junes body by fingermarks around her neck that appeared to be in blood.There was bloodstaining to her legs and nightdress and having seen the body in the kitchen ?? and thought of the struggle that must have taken place on seeing Junes body the thought of a struggle remained unquote "

[Caroline]

COLP Statement/Interview of PS Woodcock.

Does this make sense to anyone ? :

Quote," I was struck with Junes body by fingermarks around her neck that appeared to be in blood.There was bloodstaining to her legs and nightdress and having seen the body in the kitchen ?? and thought of the struggle that must have taken place on seeing Junes body the thought of a struggle remained unquote "

Yes, it makes sense, she most likely got the back eye at the same time.

[lookout]

Yes, it makes sense, she most likely got the back eye at the same time.

From whom ?

[Steve_uk]

COLP Statement/Interview of PS Woodcock.

Does this make sense to anyone ? :

Quote," I was struck with Junes body by fingermarks around her neck that appeared to be in blood.There was bloodstaining to her legs and nightdress and having seen the body in the kitchen ?? and thought of the struggle that must have taken place on seeing Junes body the thought of a struggle remained unquote "

Is this in the archives?

[lookout]

Is this in the archives?

It should be Steve. I picked it up in the " Tesko files " on the forum where the statement is.

[John]

 

Everything to match,eh John ? 

Unfortnately the trials of a perfectionist.

[John]

From whom ?

A clue.  This forum is named after him!   

[Adam]

It should be Steve. I picked it up in the " Tesko files " on the forum where the statement is.

Why don't you, Mike and Nugs work together. To help free Bamber.
 ? I am sure Bamber would appreciate it.

TB has not got the only rights to go public.

[Caroline]

Is this in the archives?

Yes it's in the archives - it's been there for ages. Woodcock also stated that he thought Sheila looked too clean to have been involved in any struggle.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4207.msg172557.html#msg172557

[Jane]

Yes it's in the archives - it's been there for ages. Woodcock also stated that he thought Sheila looked too clean to have been involved in any struggle.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4207.msg172557.html#msg172557

So Sheila gets close enough -without the gun- to strangle/claw/gouge June and Nevill and they just stand there and let her?
Well, they must have done if she had no marks to indicate otherwise.

[Caroline]

So Sheila gets close enough -without the gun- to strangle/claw/gouge June and Nevill and they just stand there and let her?
Well, they must have done if she had no marks to indicate otherwise.

No mention of gouging Jane 

[John]

And as cousin David said in his last TV appearance, not a chipped nail or a hair out of place.