Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test

[David1819]

Are you denying that the dried cracked blood is part of the same image as the one you posted?

What do you think? are these both from the same photograph? 

[Caroline]

What do you think? are these both from the same photograph? 

Are you denying that the dried cracked blood is part of the same image as the one you posted?

[David1819]

Are you denying that the dried cracked blood is part of the same image as the one you posted?

Yes its either a different photo or Distefano has edited it what else do you think I am trying to say?

[Caroline]

Yes its either a different photo or Distefano has edited it what else do you think I am trying to say?

It's the same photo - they only took ONE set. I have no idea what you're trying to say but you seem to want to push the idea that Sheila was still bleeding when the police found her - but that can't be the case because the blood around her mouth was dry, cracking with no sign of expirated blood. There is a reason why the photo you posted only shows the neck - whoever used it, didn't want anyone seeing the dried cracked blood on her face.

[David1819]

well it perverting the course of justice and he would be very lickely to get cought.

admititadly he has got a lot of front but surely even he wouldent think he could get away with that.

He recons he could have got Hitler acquitted lol

https://youtu.be/F7we7CsYptU?t=37m9s

[David1819]

It's the same photo - they only took ONE set. I have no idea what you're trying to say but you seem to want to push the idea that Sheila was still bleeding when the police found her - but that can't be the case because the blood around her mouth was dry, cracking with no sign of expirated blood. There is a reason why the photo you posted only shows the neck - whoever used it, didn't want anyone seeing the dried cracked blood on her face.

Have a look and make your own mind up. If Distefano has edited the photo like Hartley claims then they are not the same photo. simple

[nugnug]

He recons he could have got Hitler acquitted lol

https://youtu.be/F7we7CsYptU?t=37m9s

well he dident do a very good job with saddam.

[Caroline]

He recons he could have got Hitler acquitted lol

https://youtu.be/F7we7CsYptU?t=37m9s

He couldn't get Bamber off!

[nugnug]

if you try and intrudice fake evedence into an appeal there consquences if authites notice you have done and i cant for the life of me see how they wouldent notice.

[Caroline]

if you try and intrudice fake evedence into an appeal there consquences if authites notice you have done and i cant for the life of me see how they wouldent notice.

But it hasn't been used in any evidence - it was for PUBLICITY and PROPAGANDA purposes.!

[guest2181]

Have a look and make your own mind up. If Distefano has edited the photo like Hartley claims then they are not the same photo. simple

They most certainly are the same photograph, although a higher resolution image has been used to create the manipulated 'redder' image.

You are being purposely obtuse. It is not something I claim, it is a fact and the evidence of which is in front of you.

Your posts remind me of somebody else. 

[Caroline]

They most certainly are the same photograph, although a higher resolution image has been used to create the manipulated 'redder' image.

You are being purposely obtuse. It is not something I claim, it is a fact and the evidence of which is in front of you.

Your posts remind me of somebody else. 

He surely can't think that we are suggesting he took Mike's pictures of pictures and enhanced them? 

[guest2181]

He surely can't think that we are suggesting he took Mike's pictures of pictures and enhanced them? 

David is not genuine in his arguments, he is being purposely stupid and slow to understand. I don't believe he's being honest.

[Caroline]

David is not genuine in his arguments, he is being purposely stupid and slow to understand. I don't believe he's being honest.

Well, just in case and just to clarify - the pictures that Distefano enhanced, are not the pictures of pictures that Mike took, they are high res copies of the crime scene photographs BUT the throat section you originally posted is a section of the SAME picture with the dried cracked blood - only the hue has been enhanced on the section to make it LOOK like fresh wet flowing blood.

[Neil]

David is not genuine in his arguments, he is being purposely stupid and slow to understand. I don't believe he's being honest.

Somebody is very obviously seeking attention.  Please don't indulge him/her/it.