Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test

[Caroline]

I still can't understand falsified evidence being used whoever was responsible and I'm surprised why nobody has said anything.

It isn't evidence Lookout, it hasn't been used in court and we have been saying something - I have posted the picture of the dried blood many times and Bridget posted it before me. Harters has mentioned the enhanced picture and so have others. But I am glad you agree that it isn't right to do these things and hopefully as far as this forum is concerned, we can put the notion of a 'still bleeding Sheila' out to pasture.

[Jane]

It isn't evidence Lookout, it hasn't been used in court and we have been saying something - I have posted the picture of the dried blood many times and Bridget posted it before me. Harters has mentioned the enhanced picture and so have others. But I am glad you agree that it isn't right to do these things and hopefully as far as this forum is concerned, we can put the notion of a 'still bleeding Sheila' out to pasture.

Caroline, I think that's trumped everything that Adam insists he's bought closure to.

[guest154]

It isn't evidence Lookout, it hasn't been used in court and we have been saying something - I have posted the picture of the dried blood many times and Bridget posted it before me. Harters has mentioned the enhanced picture and so have others. But I am glad you agree that it isn't right to do these things and hopefully as far as this forum is concerned, we can put the notion of a 'still bleeding Sheila' out to pasture.

There will always be people that promote it because to those new to the case, the photo that Hartley posted is quite convincing. The call sheet that the OS use as propaganda sounds convincing to someone new that doesn't know anything about the case. I think that the intention is to hook new people to the case with these wild lies and then to hope a handful of those people will be hooked so much they over-look things and join the cause fully.

[Caroline]

There will always be people that promote it because to those new to the case, the photo that Hartley posted is quite convincing. The call sheet that the OS use as propaganda sounds convincing to someone new that doesn't know anything about the case. I think that the intention is to hook new people to the case with these wild lies and then to hope a handful of those people will be hooked so much they over-look things and join the cause fully.

No doubt about it but we will just have to keep putting them right - maybe we should sticky this thread to the board so we can just refer to it?

[Jane]

There will always be people that promote it because to those new to the case, the photo that Hartley posted is quite convincing. The call sheet that the OS use as propaganda sounds convincing to someone new that doesn't know anything about the case. I think that the intention is to hook new people to the case with these wild lies and then to hope a handful of those people will be hooked so much they over-look things and join the cause fully.

I couldn't agree more, Mat. It's occurred to me that the same old, same old is being trundled out again just as it was when I first joined and believed all the BS. I guess it's doing the rounds again because new people have joined and they too, will be wide eyed with wonder at what they believe they're learning.

[David1819]

You are mistaken, the image claiming to show wet blood has been digitally manipulated.

Granted the other photographs are not taken directly from the negatives, however both of the photographs which are shown in the comparison in my previous posts, ARE the same image, you can quite clearly see cracked dry blood on one of them.

They are NOT the same image. Just because you have two photos of the same thing does not mean they are identical copies. If you look at both pictures in detail and compare you can see there is a remarkable difference.



If those on left came from the image of the right then GDS done a bloody good job (no pun intended)
This would not be a case of simply enhancing or saturating the colours he would literally have to reconstruct the photo, Now considering Dodgy Distefanos reputation it would not surprise me if he did but where is the proof Distefano produced this forgery?

[Jane]

They are NOT the same image. Just because you have two photos of the same thing does need mean they are identical copies. If you look at both pictures in detail and compare you can see there is a remarkable difference.



If those on left came from the image of the right then GDS done a bloody good job (no pun intended)
This would not be a case of simply enhancing or saturating the colours he would literally have to reconstruct the photo, Now considering Dodgy Distefanos reputation it would not surprise me if he did but where is the proof Distefano produced this forgery?

Optical illusion created by colour change?

[lookout]

Shouldn't there have been red paint on the rifle's barrel which lay on Sheila's body ? Afterall,wasn't it established that the red paint was found on the barrel as opposed to the " phantom " silencer ?

[David1819]

Optical illusion created by colour change?

No. Distefano would literally have to reconstruct the image and would have needed assistance in doing so. I am open to this possibility but his shady reputation alone is not adequate proof and I think you can agree with me on that

[Jane]

No. Distefano would literally have to reconstruct the image and would have needed assistance in doing so. I am open to this possibility but his shady reputation alone is not adequate proof and I think you can agree with me on that

But it's a given that changing the colour in a picture will also create changes in shape and size in the same image. No "reconstruction" is necessary.

[David1819]

But it's a given that changing the colour in a picture will also create changes in shape and size in the same image. No "reconstruction" is necessary.

that simply is not true. I spent several years in IT and graphic design. Trust me

[nugnug]

surely even destepno would know that you know that you cant just intrduce fake photographs as evedence i dont think he would of risked it.

[David1819]

surely even destepno would know that you know that you cant just intrduce fake photographs as evedence i dont think he would of risked it.

If he can make himself a fake lawyer what is to stop him making fake photos?

[Caroline]

If he can make himself a fake lawyer what is to stop him making fake photos?

Are you denying that the dried cracked blood is part of the same image as the one you posted?

[nugnug]

If he can make himself a fake lawyer what is to stop him making fake photos?

well it perverting the course of justice and he would be very lickely to get cought.

admititadly he has got a lot of front but surely even he wouldent think he could get away with that.