Latest Vlog _ Jeremy's Polygraph Test

[lookout]

The pictures here, are ALL photographs of photographs so the the sheen is coming from the shinny surface of the original picture. Are you trying to say that the blood isn't dried and cracking?

I'm not happy about that line of blood cracking as it would only happen if there had been movement of sorts--------which looks as though it had only occurred after the first injury.
Other than that,the blood flow hadn't been sufficient/profuse enough to have continued as in the second shot. Even so,Sheila hadn't lain there for that many hours as the blood coming from her neck would have been black whereas it's still showing it as oxygenated/fresh.

[David1819]

David is just doing his trolling thing again. 

I'm waiting for him to say Sheila was on the bed next, because one officer describes her as being on the far side of the bed. 

That idea comes from the police telling AE that Shelia was found on the bed,  It's clearly a mistake.

As for Mike claiming he saw a photo of Shelia on the bed, he didn't he imagined it 

[lookout]

It goes to show how Chinese Whispers end up !!

[David1819]

The top picture is an even WORSE example as it has been taken from the TV 

No it is not, It's a screenshot. As you can see the above photo is consistent with the photo being taken on a summer morning, while mikes photo of photo looks like it was taken in the middle of night.

[Caroline]

I'm not happy about that line of blood cracking as it would only happen if there had been movement of sorts--------which looks as though it had only occurred after the first injury.
Other than that,the blood flow hadn't been sufficient/profuse enough to have continued as in the second shot. Even so,Sheila hadn't lain there for that many hours as the blood coming from her neck would have been black whereas it's still showing it as oxygenated/fresh.

Nonsense! When blood dries it shrinks causing it to crack - nothing to do with movement! She CLEARLY hadn't moved after the blood ran from her mouth - possibly because she couldn't. However, it DOSE look as though someone lifted her head, because there is a blood trail from the left side of her mouth to her left eye. Jeremy likely did this when he shot her for the second time. The dried cracked blood shows that she had been dead for some time and that the red coloured picture is a complete red herring.

[Caroline]

No it is not, It's a screenshot. As you can see the above photo is consistent with the photo being taken on a summer morning, while mikes photo of photo looks like it was taken in the middle of night.

It's a screen shot taken from a sky TV programme!! It is NOT a direct scan of the original.

[David1819]

Just noticed this ..... where are you getting this from? 

Il give you a clue. Someone who never EVER gets anything wrong! 

[Caroline]

Il give you a clue. Someone who never EVER gets anything wrong! 

Well, he did this time. I can find NOTHING to support that claim - but if you can, goon on you! The blood isn't running and I thin the ORIGINAL pictures would support this. The bright photo and the shine from the picture when it was photographed just gives the impression that the blood is wet. You can see the blood from her mouth is dried and cracked - which is why, whoever took the bright red picture omitted it.

[Caroline]

There is only one logical explanation in respect to the dried cracked blood from Sheila's mouth - she had been dead from the point when this blood initially flowed. Had she been alive at any point after - she would have had to cough the residue which would have caused spluttering and there would have been expirated blood spatter on her face, on her nightdress and on objects around her. Other than the blood that poured from her mouth, there are no spits or spots. The blood is dried and cracked so she had been dead for some time - this being the case, her heart had stopped so, given that she is on her back, how can blood be pumping from a wound in her neck? The suggestion is rubbish 

[David1819]

It's AMAZING what the old submandibulars and salivarys can do, isn't it?

Other bodily fluids from the neck/mouth mixing with blood is not something I would describe as "AMAZING"

But what ever floats your boat Jane 

[Jane]

Other bodily fluids from the neck/mouth mixing with blood is not something I would describe as "AMAZING"

But what ever floats your boat Jane 

Really? I'd have described as being AMAZING, even MIRACULOUS, the entire workings of the human body. It most certainly floats my boat, David

[Caroline]

Those who think that Sheila couldn't have been dead long because blood was running from her neck would have to explain how she was still breathing with blood in her mouth and throat? With no sign of any expirated blood on her face and the surrounding area? While the long since dried cracked blood which had ran from her mouth - shows she had been dead for some time.

It's not possible to breath with a throat full of coagulated blood - if you're not breathing, your heart isn't pumping which makes it impossible for blood to flow from a wound on top of the body, it defies gravity!

[David1819]

According to the 2005 Sky documentary this is an Essex Police photo.

Why the blood appears wet is anyone's guess. However if it was at all conclusive Jeremy would be released by now. But he is not thus the photo is inconclusive

[lookout]

Nonsense! When blood dries it shrinks causing it to crack - nothing to do with movement! She CLEARLY hadn't moved after the blood ran from her mouth - possibly because she couldn't. However, it DOSE look as though someone lifted her head, because there is a blood trail from the left side of her mouth to her left eye. Jeremy likely did this when he shot her for the second time. The dried cracked blood shows that she had been dead for some time and that the red coloured picture is a complete red herring.

What is there to say that Sheila didn't move her own head to the left ? We don't know do we ? Nobody had to move her head did they ? What would have been the purpose ?
It could have been an involuntary movement after the impact of the shot for all we know with the next following close after.

[Caroline]

What is there to say that Sheila didn't move her own head to the left ? We don't know do we ? Nobody had to move her head did they ? What would have been the purpose ?
It could have been an involuntary movement after the impact of the shot for all we know with the next following close after.

She would have to TIP her head backwards from an elevated position for th blood to be able to run into her eye or 'someone' would have had to lift it. Turning her head to the side wouldn't allow blood to run UP to her eye - it defies the laws of gravity AGAIN. The impact of a .22 wouldn't be enough to lift someone's head from the floor and push it back to make such a trail.