0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
We certainly are the people who decide credibility on THIS forum and are here to express an OPINION - otherwise no one would be debating anything and the forum would exist. However, as you say, you are also guilty of deciding which experts have credibility so I don't see what point you are trying to make?
i think i made my point quite clearly caroline.i found him credible, informative and i am prepared to consider his findings.
What has happened in Bambers favour? All that has occurred recently is a grave yard Vlog anda video with the polygraph expert. The Grave yard V log brought Bamber a lot of national negative press, exposed Trudi as someone who is willing to lie for Bamber and showed that some supporters will back him whether he is right or wrong and that guilt or innocence isn't as important to them as defending Bamber is.The Polygraph video showed that one of the OS's biggest claims comes from a man that was relatively new in his training and is still in touch with the defence.
Can I ask you where is the proof that she lied for Jeremy? That's quite an accusation.
Jeremy's own words in the letter are enough for me.The letter reads as if it was supposed to be read to his parents at their grave. The letter WAS read at the grave of his parents. You will believe Trudi and that is fine.
You could always counter that by arguing that it was Trudi's idea in the first place for Jeremy to write a letter and she reads it at the grave. Then technically Jeremy did not "send her" Thou that would make Trudi rather creepy (in my opinion)
You could, but that would mean that the letter was still meant to be read at the grave, even if it was Trudis idea and not Bambers. She says it was a CT decision to read it there. Must just be a coincidence Jeremy worded it perfectly to be read there and said he wishes he was there to read it himself.For the record #JeremyBamber didn't force, persuade or even ask me to read his words at his parent's graveside..It was a campaign decision!
I think it's fair to say he hinted though but?
I think it's creepy that she would do it. If she was asked, if she wasn't asked, if he hinted, if he didn't hint. I think someone who would be willing to be filmed disgracing themselves (IMO ) would also be willing to lie for Bamber - simple as that really.She even seemed proud of all the press coverage. It makes me shudder!!.....But there is a rumour that a CT member has an account here and has been posting with us, so I guess it will get back to her how negatively her and her video are viewed.
I think I will contact Mullins and ask if he has the "results" from Bambers polygraph and if he does, if he willing to share the polygraph chart - which can then be viewed/judged and reported on by other experts in his field.
Ive seen the results. Il see If I can find were I left a copy
