Author Topic: Questions about the alleged conversations between Sheila and the police:  (Read 1767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
From the OS - " Sheila was shot twice. The police didn't think there was anything odd about the way she was found because they knew she had killed herself as they had been in conversation with her that morning while Jeremy was with them".

Questions

Where was Bamber when these conversations with Sheila were taking place ?

If he was outside with the police, why did he not bring this up until decades later ?

If he was in the police car, why did the police not alert him ?

If they did not alert Bamber, why was he not told about this at another time ?

If he was in the police car, would he still not be able to hear or see Sheila ? The police were using a loud speaker.

If Sheila was alive and communicating with the police, why did the police attempt to frame Bamber. One month after the correct murder/suicide verdict ?

How was Sheila communicating with the police. She did not have a loud speaker ?

Why would Sheila keep herself alive ?

Why would Sheila communicate with the police ?

Does this communication mean the raid team are also in on the frame attempt ?

The  radio log went on to say 'conversation attempts in the house met with no response' Did Bamber not read this ?

If Bamber read that 'conversations attempts in the house met with no response', why is he saying there were conversations ?

Is this article on the OS just propaganda. Similar to claims that Neville called the police ?

Why did the relatives persist in claiming Bamber was guilty. The police, especially Taff, would have told them about the conversation with Sheila ?

Was this allegation part of the 2012 CCRC application ?

Should the OS and Bamber admit there were no conversations with Sheila ?

Do any supporters or guilters believe there were conversations with Sheila inside WHF ?

If it is just more propaganda, should the OS and campaign in general be dismissed ?
« Last Edit: February 02, 2016, 07:23:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
From the OS - " Sheila was shot twice. The police didn't think there was anything odd about the way she was found because they knew she had killed herself as they had been in conversation with her that morning while Jeremy was with them".

Questions

Where was Bamber when these conversations with Sheila were taking place ?

If he was outside with the police, why did he not bring this up until decades later ?

If he was in the police car, why did the police not alert him ?

If they did not alert Bamber, why was he not told about this at another time ?

If he was in the police car, would he still not be able to hear or see Sheila ? The police were using a loud speaker.

If Sheila was alive and communicating with the police, why did the police attempt to frame Bamber. One month after the correct murder/suicide verdict ?

How was Sheila communicating with the police. She did not have a loud speaker ?

Why would Sheila keep herself alive ?

Why would Sheila communicate with the police ?

Does this communication mean the raid team are also in on the frame attempt ?

The  radio log went on to say 'conversation attempts in the house met with no response' Did Bamber not read this ?

If Bamber read that 'conversations attempts in the house met with no response', why is he saying there were conversations ?

Is this article on the OS just propaganda. Similar to claims that Neville called the police ?

Why did the relatives persist in claiming Bamber was guilty. The police, especially Taff, would have told them about the conversation with Sheila ?

Was this allegation part of the 2012 CCRC application ?

Should the OS and Bamber admit there were no conversations with Sheila ?

Do any supporters or guilters believe there were conversations with Sheila inside WHF ?

If it is just more propaganda, should the OS and campaign in general be dismissed ?

They are talking about the comment in the log (posted below) however, they don't mention that the comment is followed by 'challenge to persons inside house, met with no response'. Clearly the person writing the log was told that they were trying to talk to someone inside WHF BUT there was never any answer.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
Hopefully some supporters can shed some light.

Either they agree with the OS that Sheila was in conversation with the police. So can answer the above questions.

Or they agree the OS and Bamber are lying.

Hopefully the answers will be better than the answers to my questions on the bible. A supporter answered some of the questions in red, which obviously favoured Bamber. However no sources were supplied, both before and after my request.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44327
How would the OS know there were conversations with Sheila ? Only from Bamber ?

If he witnessed this, then why didn't he bring it up in 1985 ?

If he didn't witness it, then he and the OS are deliberately manipulating a radio log. Just as they did regarding the two bodies in the kitchen claim.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
 Strange how you all believe those professionals who were involved with the trial,yet disbelieve those who are at present working on the case.
 The QC,Barrister,Solicitor will have the same level of knowledge as those at trial 30 years ago,if not more so.

guest154

  • Guest
Strange how you all believe those professionals who were involved with the trial,yet disbelieve those who are at present working on the case.
The QC,Barrister,Solicitor will have the same level of knowledge as those at trial 30 years ago,if not more so.

It's not a QC or a barrister updating the official site.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Strange how you all believe those professionals who were involved with the trial,yet disbelieve those who are at present working on the case.
 The QC,Barrister,Solicitor will have the same level of knowledge as those at trial 30 years ago,if not more so.

No self respecting legal professional would touch the OS with a barge pole.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
It's not a QC or a barrister updating the official site.





No--------they're busy working in the background. It's only empty vessels that make the most noise !!

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076




No--------they're busy working in the background. It's only empty vessels that make the most noise !!

The CT are making LOTS of noise.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
The CT are making LOTS of noise.





Not really. I've said that they're not forceful enough. They're nowhere near as vocal as you lot !!

guest154

  • Guest




No--------they're busy working in the background. It's only empty vessels that make the most noise !!

I deffo agree!!

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076




Not really. I've said that they're not forceful enough. They're nowhere near as vocal as you lot !!

Yeah cuz we all have video's on Youtube talking BS.  ::) ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

John

  • Guest
Strange how you all believe those professionals who were involved with the trial,yet disbelieve those who are at present working on the case.
 The QC,Barrister,Solicitor will have the same level of knowledge as those at trial 30 years ago,if not more so.

So what, nothing has changed?  Bamber is more guilty now then ever thanks to DNA advances.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2016, 01:45:AM by John »

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Blimey Adam thats 18 questions in one post, !

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
So what, nothing has changed?  Bamber is more guilty now then ever thanks to DNA advances.






Where are the DNA results then ??