Juries

[JackiePreece]

Posts: 3240
View Profile  Email  Personal Message (Online)

Re: Will there ever be another CCRC hearing ?
« Reply #59 on: Today at 07:49 PM »
QuoteModifyRemove
Quote from: Caroline on Today at 12:49 AM
They probably have - back in 1985 and now it's just something they did way back when. Some may have even died. I don't think any will be joining the forum though and if they did - they would just be abused by certain members.

You can't help yourself can you???

Who would they be abused by exactly?

You?

[JackiePreece]

Questions about jury service
4. Discussing the trial
Don’t discuss the case with anyone, except other jury members in the jury deliberation room.

Even when the trial’s over you mustn’t discuss the case, even with family members.

Don’t post comments about the trial on social media websites like Facebook or Twitter - even after the trial’s finished. This is contempt of court and you can be fined or sent to prison.

If anyone approaches you about the trial
Tell a court officer if you’re approached about the trial. If you’re approached outside court, tell a police officer.

If you find the trial distressing
You may be upset by the trial and want to speak to someone privately. Speak to court staff - they’ll give you advice.

In other words if the 10 jurors who found Jeremy guilty feel duped by the likes of Mugford (NOTW) or the lies that were told and generally being misled or not being given 'the full story'

The cannot voice an opinion or risk prison

[Jan]

Jan thanks for that did not know that why did the police not charge him instead of the Jenkins guy you obviously think him innocent I cannot remember the case very well but at the time I was sure he was guilty.  Guess we will never know,

Because although he knocked on a door nearby witnesses saw him further away and apparently he was not near the house at the time .

The police said he was a red herring . Bit of a coincidence though .

[lookout]

What about the guy in the hallway of the house who it was thought was part of the police team----and wasn't ? That was odd too. Then there was a " trampy " person----as seen in this case as well.

[lookout]

Between him and Barry George ( who I thought was the culprit because of residue found on him ) I was baffled. Both oddballs.

[maggie]

Between him and Barry George ( who I thought was the culprit because of residue found on him ) I was baffled. Both oddballs.

Never believed Barry George was involved, Lookout.  He simply wasn't physically capable of that murder imo.

[lookout]

Never believed Barry George was involved, Lookout.  He simply wasn't physically capable of that murder imo.

At the time,everything seemed to fit with him being the murderer. His way and his life-style. It just shows what can happen when you judge the person and not the crime. Dangerous.

[Jan]

Never believed Barry George was involved, Lookout.  He simply wasn't physically capable of that murder imo.

No and I don't think he was capable of telling lies of covering up anything either.