Author Topic: Juries  (Read 8134 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Juries
« Reply #60 on: January 22, 2016, 03:30:PM »
I bet he wouldn't either. He was a bad-tempered so and so too. His wife was scared of him.
I have never really had an opinion and don't know anything about his relationship with his wife but if she was frightened of him it's probable he was abusive so it looks pretty suspicious imo.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Juries
« Reply #61 on: January 22, 2016, 03:51:PM »
I have never really had an opinion and don't know anything about his relationship with his wife but if she was frightened of him it's probable he was abusive so it looks pretty suspicious imo.





I can't just remember what sort of a teacher he was or whether he ever " lost it " with his pupils. I do remember reading that his wife had been scared of him because of his temper,so yes it sounds iffy,even though he stayed around and his wife fled the country with her children,either Australia or New Zealand. I think both have re-married.
I couldn't believe that he was the murderer and I'm still not 100% sure that he was and unlike Jeremy's case,this was one where the man DID have blood on his hands and clothing but again,he would have had after either killing or just holding the girl. :-\

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Juries
« Reply #62 on: January 22, 2016, 04:06:PM »
That is telling, I think.  She knew better than anyone if he was capable of such an act.

Maggie I am sure one of his daughters was sure of his guilt and she has refused to have anything to do with him strange guy.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Juries
« Reply #63 on: January 22, 2016, 05:05:PM »
Maggie I am sure one of his daughters was sure of his guilt and she has refused to have anything to do with him strange guy.
All very strange susan, we shall probably never know the truth.  :-\ :-\
« Last Edit: January 22, 2016, 05:06:PM by maggie »

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Juries
« Reply #64 on: January 22, 2016, 05:10:PM »
I trust his wifes instincts.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Juries
« Reply #65 on: January 22, 2016, 05:12:PM »
Shows how juries can be manipulated in the hands of the right lawyer.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Juries
« Reply #66 on: January 22, 2016, 05:14:PM »
I trust his wifes instincts.
I agree Buddy, she would know and she certainly wanted to get as fr away from him as possible ... speaks volumes.  :)

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Juries
« Reply #67 on: January 22, 2016, 05:16:PM »
Their must be many lawyers/barristers that wring their hands,and hold their heads at the jury system.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Juries
« Reply #68 on: January 22, 2016, 05:25:PM »
There must be hundreds, or thousands that have been cleared or convicted by eronious juries

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Juries
« Reply #69 on: January 22, 2016, 06:32:PM »




I can't just remember what sort of a teacher he was or whether he ever " lost it " with his pupils. I do remember reading that his wife had been scared of him because of his temper,so yes it sounds iffy,even though he stayed around and his wife fled the country with her children,either Australia or New Zealand. I think both have re-married.
I couldn't believe that he was the murderer and I'm still not 100% sure that he was and unlike Jeremy's case,this was one where the man DID have blood on his hands and clothing but again,he would have had after either killing or just holding the girl. :-\

It certainly was a strange case though. If he lost his temper why would he put part of a plastic bin bag in her mouth ? 

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Juries
« Reply #70 on: January 22, 2016, 06:46:PM »
It certainly was a strange case though. If he lost his temper why would he put part of a plastic bin bag in her mouth ?

Jan did he do that I can't remember that but I do think he is guilty and now married to a lady who is rich and he will be living the high life.  So sad.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Juries
« Reply #71 on: January 22, 2016, 06:51:PM »
Jan did he do that I can't remember that but I do think he is guilty and now married to a lady who is rich and he will be living the high life.  So sad.

actually it was her nose .


There has only been one other suspect, a man known for legal reasons as Mr B. He had a "rather confused conversation" with the owner of a guest house whose front doorbell he rang, before going off in the direction of the town centre, which would have taken him past the Jenkins home. While in custody he behaved strangely, once being found lying in a foetal position in his police cell with part of a plastic bag held up to his nose. Two more fragments of plastic were found in his underpants. This appeared significant because when Billie-Jo's body was examined, part of a black plastic bin bag was found stuffed deep inside one of her nostrils

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Juries
« Reply #72 on: January 22, 2016, 06:58:PM »
If you think about it people say Sheila would be covered in her fathers blood - but Billie Jo was viciously beaten and he only had tiny  spots invisible to the naked eye?

but allegedly there MAY be evidence that the blood contained minute pieces of Billie Jo's bone fragments?

that would be a difficult one.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Juries
« Reply #73 on: January 22, 2016, 07:25:PM »
actually it was her nose .


There has only been one other suspect, a man known for legal reasons as Mr B. He had a "rather confused conversation" with the owner of a guest house whose front doorbell he rang, before going off in the direction of the town centre, which would have taken him past the Jenkins home. While in custody he behaved strangely, once being found lying in a foetal position in his police cell with part of a plastic bag held up to his nose. Two more fragments of plastic were found in his underpants. This appeared significant because when Billie-Jo's body was examined, part of a black plastic bin bag was found stuffed deep inside one of her nostrils





Jan thanks for that did not know that why did the police not charge him instead of the Jenkins guy you obviously think him innocent I cannot remember the case very well but at the time I was sure he was guilty.  Guess we will never know,

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Juries
« Reply #74 on: January 22, 2016, 07:47:PM »
Questions about jury service
4. Discussing the trial
Don’t discuss the case with anyone, except other jury members in the jury deliberation room.

Even when the trial’s over you mustn’t discuss the case, even with family members.

Don’t post comments about the trial on social media websites like Facebook or Twitter - even after the trial’s finished. This is contempt of court and you can be fined or sent to prison.

If anyone approaches you about the trial
Tell a court officer if you’re approached about the trial. If you’re approached outside court, tell a police officer.

If you find the trial distressing
You may be upset by the trial and want to speak to someone privately. Speak to court staff - they’ll give you advice.
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill