Author Topic: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?  (Read 3518 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2016, 01:20:AM »
Who thinks that? I suppose it is an interesting thought. I believe he tries to repress as much as possible, in order to act 'innocent' which is why his innocent act comes off so poorly, because he doesn't know HOW he should be feeling/speaking only how he THINKS he should be. But I think he knows damn well what he did, which is why he attempts to control the areas his supporters hammer away at, he knows where the police investigation didn't get his method perfectly.

I'm with you, he knows EXACTLY what he did.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2016, 09:19:AM »
I'm with you, he knows EXACTLY what he did.

I suppose he must know exactly what he did... and what he didn't do.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2016, 10:59:AM »
I suppose he must know exactly what he did... and what he didn't do.

Of course - he did kill the family, he didn't answer a call from his father.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2016, 12:08:PM »
Of course - he did kill the family, he didn't answer a call from his father.

Or vice versa.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #49 on: January 07, 2016, 12:46:PM »
I'm with you, he knows EXACTLY what he did.





He would have done if he'd DONE it.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #50 on: January 07, 2016, 12:52:PM »
Of course - he did kill the family, he didn't answer a call from his father.






You sound very much as though you're now convincing yourself, however positive the next outcome is going to be.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #51 on: January 07, 2016, 05:33:PM »





You sound very much as though you're now convincing yourself, however positive the next outcome is going to be.

Caroline was convinced of his guilt some time ago.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie's WS the day after the massacre. Why wasn't Bamber accused ?
« Reply #52 on: January 07, 2016, 08:25:PM »
Caroline was convinced of his guilt some time ago.

That's correct.
Few people have the imagination for reality