0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I haven't read CALS book, but I do not understand why he decided to change what he originally thought. First we have to accept his findings then we dont, then we do again. its all very iffy.
Can you make an informed decision when you don't have all of the facts?
That " mountain " was built from a molehill !!
Where is the FORENSIC evidence against Sheila?
For starters,the blood on the Bible ( prints )
Even if we KNEW it was her blood, how does that prove she killed anyone?
It would if that blood had been tested,as if not her blood,it would have been someone else's on her hand/s. So why wasn't it tested and investigated ? It was all part of the scene at the time ?
So there STILL isn't ANY forensic evidence to link Sheila to the murders, just another 'if' and a 'but'!
About as much as there was from Jeremy,then ?
But you're willing to argue the case for Sheila's guilt WITHOUT ANY forensic evidence yet bleat on about how there is no forensic evidence to connect Jeremy?
Where is the forensic evidence connecting Jeremy anyway ?
You've been told that a thousand times! Time for you to make the case for Sheila - forensic evidence that links Sheila?
But I've NEVER seen or been convinced about this forensic evidence against Jeremy,so I can only gather that you're just playing for time when you state that there is----------hoping that the question will go away.