Author Topic: New Technology  (Read 31284 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #180 on: January 10, 2016, 02:42:PM »
It's a multiple shot suicide to the neck/chin with the same type of weapon. I was just trying prove that it can be done!




Would not a semi-automatic deliver 2 shots for one ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #181 on: January 10, 2016, 02:42:PM »
I know it is, but the text doesn't mention anything about a 'rifle' - it could have been a handgun. There is a presumption that it was the same kind of weapon but that's not what it says - or don't you think clarity is important?


Caroline, I'd assumed it was a hand gun. I can't get my head round ANYONE manipulating a rifle to shoot themselves four times.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: New Technology
« Reply #182 on: January 10, 2016, 02:44:PM »
I know it is, but the text doesn't mention anything about a 'rifle' - it could have been a handgun. There is a presumption that it was the same kind of weapon but that's not what it says - or don't you think clarity is important?

So you are thinking a hand gun with the same size bullets would be less powerful and therefore more likely to use 4 attempts? That sounds like a question for skippy :)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #183 on: January 10, 2016, 02:44:PM »

Caroline, I'd assumed it was a hand gun. I can't get my head round ANYONE manipulating a rifle to shoot themselves four times.

Exactly - if it's not 'like for like' it's not relevant.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #184 on: January 10, 2016, 02:47:PM »
So you are thinking a hand gun with the same size bullets would be less powerful and therefore more likely to use 4 attempts? That sounds like a question for skippy :)

No, I'm not thinking that at all but had a guilty supporter posted incorrect info, would you be so keen to defend it? Also, given that we don't know the circumstances of this guys suicide, it's not relevant.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: New Technology
« Reply #185 on: January 10, 2016, 02:48:PM »
So you are thinking a hand gun with the same size bullets would be less powerful and therefore more likely to use 4 attempts? That sounds like a question for skippy :)

There are lots of different types of .22 bullets. I don't know, but I'd guess that some vary in effectiveness.  :-\

I'd have said (another guess) that a rifle and hand gun would be as powerful as each other, but a rifle is more accurate at distance.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #186 on: January 10, 2016, 02:48:PM »



Would not a semi-automatic deliver 2 shots for one ?


Lookout, someone who knows about such things has said here several times now, because you have made the same statement several times, that it -a semi automatic- requires exactly the same trigger action as a non semi automatic, ie one shot, one bullet. It doesn't matter how many times you ask the question or make the point, the answer won't change.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: New Technology
« Reply #187 on: January 10, 2016, 03:14:PM »



Would not a semi-automatic deliver 2 shots for one ?

A semi automatic re chambers the next bullet so all you have to do is pull the trigger


Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #188 on: January 10, 2016, 03:17:PM »
A semi automatic re chambers the next bullet so all you have to do is pull the trigger



Point being that you HAVE to pull the trigger for each and every shot.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: New Technology
« Reply #189 on: January 10, 2016, 03:21:PM »
Point being that you HAVE to pull the trigger for each and every shot.

Yeah that is what I said.

 A fully automatic you would  need to hold the trigger down and it won't stop

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #190 on: January 10, 2016, 03:24:PM »
A semi automatic re chambers the next bullet so all you have to do is pull the trigger







Thankyou David.That's just about all I wanted to know. So therefore it's not impossible for the slightest touch to the trigger to deliver a second shot within seconds of the first.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #191 on: January 10, 2016, 03:27:PM »
Yeah that is what I said.

 A fully automatic you would  need to hold the trigger down and it won't stop


I had a car which worked in a similar way. It had no clutch but I had to put it in gear manually. It was called a Freetronic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #192 on: January 10, 2016, 03:32:PM »




Thankyou David.That's just about all I wanted to know. So therefore it's not impossible for the slightest touch to the trigger to deliver a second shot within seconds of the first.

If one HAS to pull the trigger for each and every shot, why, as a matter of safety, should it be that the slightest touch could result in the firing of another, and perhaps inappropriate, bullet?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: New Technology
« Reply #193 on: January 10, 2016, 03:42:PM »
So you are thinking a hand gun with the same size bullets would be less powerful and therefore more likely to use 4 attempts? That sounds like a question for skippy :)

The website I got the photo from said it was .22 rifle. Besides who shoots themselves under the chin with a handgun? You would aim to the side of the head above the ear. I am sure someone in the past has used a handgun to shoot themselves in the neck but it would be a very odd decision to make

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #194 on: January 10, 2016, 03:45:PM »
The website I got the photo from said it was .22 rifle. Besides who shoots themselves under the chin with a handgun? You would aim to the side of the head above the ear. I am sure someone in the past has used a handgun to shoot themselves in the neck but it would be a very odd decision to make


I doubt very much that anything has happened which hasn't previously but such doesn't make it the blue print for future happenings.