New Technology

[Caroline]

 The very mention of earth being a planet tells us that it isn't flat ? Something we all know from childhood ? That's an easy one.

And for once you believe the right thing but I'm surprised with you 'intuition' that you don't actually believe it's flat! 

[guest154]

Well it couldn't have been Jeremy's blood or we'd have known about it !!

You've just been complaining it wasn't tested. So how do YOU know is wasn;t Jeremy's blood. If it wasn't tested as you claim, then you do not know that. Stop posting erroneous things.

[lookout]

You've just been complaining it wasn't tested. So how do YOU know is wasn;t Jeremy's blood. If it wasn't tested as you claim, then you do not know that. Stop posting erroneous things.

Like I said,we'd have known about it,especially for the benefit of those who can't wait to say " I told you so ".

[guest154]

Like I said,we'd have known about it,especially for the benefit of those who can't wait to say " I told you so ".

So they were tested, but have been suppressed?

[lookout]

So they were tested, but have been suppressed?

It was June's blood on the socks.

[guest154]

It was June's blood on the socks.

We've already discussed June being shot first whilst laid down in bed and then stumbling out of bed and around that side.

[lookout]

We've already discussed June being shot first whilst laid down in bed and then stumbling out of bed and around that side.

  I know that.I was talking about the blood and who it'd belonged to.

[guest154]

  I know that.I was talking about the blood and who it'd belonged to.

So now can you explain how this blood, belonging to June on the socks. Is forensic evidence that SHEILA is guilty. Because on the previous page you told Caroline, the socks and the bible were forensic evidence to prove that Sheila is guilty.

I gave you forensic--------the Bible the blue socks too,which nobody bothered to investigate. I DO know the difference between forensic and circumstantial !!
 Stop exaggerating with your " list of circumstantial reasons ".Where ?

[Jane]

It was June's blood on the socks.

Possibly probably but as they weren't tested -or perhaps you think the results are being withheld?- if the blood was June's, who was wounded and, therefore, bled. we won't know one way or t'other.

[Caroline]

So now can you explain how this blood, belonging to June on the socks. Is forensic evidence that SHEILA is guilty. Because on the previous page you told Caroline, the socks and the bible were forensic evidence to prove that Sheila is guilty.

I'm still waiting foe some forensic proof that Sheila is responsible?

[lookout]

I'm still waiting foe some forensic proof that Sheila is responsible?

The same as I'm still waiting for proof of forensic evidence that says JB is guilty--------beyond reasonable doubt ??

Sheila's " pedigree " wasn't exactly encouraging to start with.

[guest154]

I'm still waiting foe some forensic proof that Sheila is responsible?

So far you've been given socks that had Junes blood on them and a bible that wasn't tested as forensic evidence proving Sheila's guilt.

You buying?

[Caroline]

So far you've been given socks that had Junes blood on them and a bible that wasn't tested as forensic evidence proving Sheila's guilt.

You buying?

I'm laughing!